Suppr超能文献

中国和美国患者的倾向评分匹配分析:微创与开放胃切除术治疗胃腺癌的长期生存比较。

Long-Term Survival after Minimally Invasive Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Patients in the United States and China.

机构信息

Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.

Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Mar;27(3):802-811. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-08170-5. Epub 2020 Jan 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the long-term survival of patients undergoing minimally invasive gastrectomy and those undergoing open gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) in the United States and China.

METHODS

Data on patients with GA who underwent gastrectomy without neoadjuvant therapy were retrieved from prospectively maintained databases at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and Fujian Medical University Union Hospital (FMUUH). Using propensity score-matching (PSM), equally sized cohorts of patients with similar clinical and pathologic characteristics who underwent minimally invasive versus open gastrectomy were selected. The primary end point of the study was 5-year overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The study identified 479 patients who underwent gastrectomy at MSKCC between 2000 and 2012 and 2935 patients who underwent gastrectomy at FMUUH between 2006 and 2014. Of the total 3432 patients, 1355 underwent minimally invasive gastrectomy, and 2059 underwent open gastrectomy. All the patients had at least 5 years of potential follow-up evaluation. Before PSM, most patient characteristics differed significantly between the patients undergoing the two types of surgery. After PSM, each cohort included 889 matched patients, and the actual 5-year OS did not differ significantly between the two cohorts, with an OS rate of 54% after minimally invasive gastrectomy and 50.4% after open gastrectomy (p = 0.205). Subgroup analysis confirmed that survival was similar between surgical cohorts among the patients for each stage of GA and for those undergoing distal versus total/proximal gastrectomy. In the multivariable analysis, surgical approach was not an independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

After PSM of U.S. and Chinese patients with GA undergoing gastrectomy, long-term survival did not differ significantly between the patients undergoing minimally invasive gastrectomy and those undergoing open gastrectomy.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较美国和中国接受微创胃切除术和开放胃切除术治疗胃腺癌(GA)患者的长期生存情况。

方法

从纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心(MSKCC)和福建医科大学附属协和医院(FMUUH)前瞻性维护的数据库中检索了未接受新辅助治疗的 GA 患者接受胃切除术的数据。使用倾向评分匹配(PSM),选择了接受微创与开放胃切除术的具有相似临床和病理特征的患者的大小相等的队列。该研究的主要终点是 5 年总生存率(OS)。

结果

该研究确定了 2000 年至 2012 年期间在 MSKCC 接受胃切除术的 479 例患者和 2006 年至 2014 年期间在 FMUUH 接受胃切除术的 2935 例患者。在总共 3432 例患者中,有 1355 例接受了微创胃切除术,2059 例接受了开放胃切除术。所有患者都有至少 5 年的潜在随访评估。在 PSM 之前,两种手术患者的大多数患者特征存在显著差异。PSM 后,每个队列均包括 889 例匹配患者,并且两种队列之间的实际 5 年 OS 没有显著差异,微创胃切除术的 OS 率为 54%,开放胃切除术的 OS 率为 50.4%(p=0.205)。亚组分析证实,在每个 GA 分期和远端与全/近端胃切除术的患者中,手术队列之间的生存情况相似。在多变量分析中,手术方式不是独立的预后因素。

结论

对接受胃切除术的美国和中国 GA 患者进行 PSM 后,微创胃切除术和开放胃切除术患者的长期生存情况无显著差异。

相似文献

2
Total gastrectomy in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma: Is there an advantage to the minimally invasive approach?
Surgery. 2019 Oct;166(4):623-631. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.05.041. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
3
Minimally invasive gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A national perspective on oncologic outcomes and overall survival.
Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;26(3):324-330. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
4
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Propensity-Matched Analysis.
Surg Innov. 2020 Feb;27(1):26-31. doi: 10.1177/1553350619868113. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
6
Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.
Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;27(3):441-448. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 May 26.
7
Impact of minimally invasive gastrectomy on use of and time to adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric adenocarcinoma.
J Surg Oncol. 2020 Mar;121(3):486-493. doi: 10.1002/jso.25834. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
8
Comparison of Outcomes for Elderly Gastric Cancer Patients at Least 80 Years of Age Following Gastrectomy in the United States and China.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov;25(12):3629-3638. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6757-2. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
9
Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: the American experience.
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Mar;20(2):368-378. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0605-5. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
10
Minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for gastric cancer with liver metastasis: a comparison with open surgery.
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1422-1433. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5826-0. Epub 2017 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

2
Complications Following Open Versus Minimally Invasive Resection of Gastric Adenocarcinoma.
J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun;131(7):1302-1312. doi: 10.1002/jso.28073. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
6
Robotic versus open approach in total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a comparative single-center study of perioperative outcomes.
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1735-1741. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01591-1. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
10
Disparities in Utilization and Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Techniques for Gastric Cancer Surgery in the United States.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 May;29(5):3136-3146. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-11193-6. Epub 2022 Jan 7.

本文引用的文献

4
Robotic vs open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis on short- and long-term outcomes.
Int J Med Robot. 2019 Oct;15(5):e2019. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2019. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
5
Early unplanned reoperations after gastrectomy for gastric cancer are different between laparoscopic surgery and open surgery.
Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):4133-4142. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06722-0. Epub 2019 Apr 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验