Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, Australia.
Centre of Epidemiology and Evidence, NSW Health, Sydney, Australia.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Feb;29(2):177-186. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.7828. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
Recommendations for using menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) and bisphosphonates for postmenopausal osteoporosis management have changed over time. After the release of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial results in 2002, new evidence on risks and benefits of MHT became available, and newer guidelines generally specify that MHT should not be prescribed for prevention of chronic disease, including osteoporosis. This raises the question of whether bisphosphonate prescribing changed over time to compensate for the decrease in MHT use. We examined trends in dispensed prescriptions in Australia (national) and Canada (province of Manitoba) in relation to prescribing recommendations. Administrative data were used to describe dispensing patterns and changes for persons of all ages from 1996 to 2008, and for women aged 50 to ≥80 years from 2003 to 2008 in Australia and 1996 to 2008 in Canada. In both geographic settings, MHT dispensing increased 1996-2001, peaked in 2001, and declined substantially thereafter (67% reduction in MHT prescriptions for Australia; 64% reduction for Manitoba, Canada to 2008). From 2003 to 2008, the number of MHT prescriptions declined among all age groups in both settings, with the highest declines among women in their 50s. Concurrently, bisphosphonate dispensing increased until 2005 (2001-2005: 260% increase in the number of prescriptions in Australia; 125% increase in Manitoba) and stabilized thereafter, in both settings. Annual bisphosphonate dispensing rates increased 4.1-10.9% for women in their 70s and 80s in Australia and Manitoba during the period studied. Based on dispensed prescriptions data, more recent guidelines for MHT and bisphosphonates use for postmenopausal osteoporosis, which were updated during the study period (and are still consistent with the current guidelines), appear to have been broadly adhered to in both settings.
关于绝经后骨质疏松症管理中使用激素替代疗法(MHT)和双膦酸盐的建议随着时间的推移而发生了变化。2002 年妇女健康倡议(WHI)试验结果公布后,出现了关于 MHT 的风险和益处的新证据,新的指南通常规定,不应开 MHT 来预防慢性病,包括骨质疏松症。这就提出了一个问题,即随着时间的推移,双膦酸盐的处方是否发生了变化,以弥补 MHT 使用量的减少。我们研究了澳大利亚(全国)和加拿大(马尼托巴省)的处方趋势与处方建议的关系。使用行政数据描述了 1996 年至 2008 年所有年龄段的配药模式和变化,以及澳大利亚 2003 年至 2008 年和加拿大 1996 年至 2008 年 50 岁及以上女性的变化。在这两个地理区域,MHT 的配药量在 1996 年至 2001 年增加,在 2001 年达到峰值,此后大幅下降(澳大利亚 MHT 处方减少 67%;加拿大马尼托巴省减少 64%,至 2008 年)。从 2003 年到 2008 年,两个地区所有年龄段的 MHT 处方数量都有所下降,50 多岁的女性下降幅度最大。同时,双膦酸盐的配药量一直增加到 2005 年(澳大利亚 2001 年至 2005 年处方数量增加 260%;马尼托巴省增加 125%),此后在两个地区稳定下来。在研究期间,澳大利亚和马尼托巴省 70 多岁和 80 多岁女性的年度双膦酸盐配药率分别增加了 4.1%-10.9%。根据配药数据,在研究期间更新的(且仍与当前指南一致)关于 MHT 和双膦酸盐用于绝经后骨质疏松症的最新指南,在这两个地区似乎都得到了广泛遵守。