• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Countercurrents: The bias of choice.逆流：选择的偏差。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Dec;26(6):e712-e713. doi: 10.3747/co.26.5165. Epub 2019 Dec 1.
2
Assessment of Temporal Selection Bias in Genomic Testing in a Cohort of Patients With Cancer.评估癌症患者队列中基因组检测的时间选择偏倚。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e206976. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6976.
3
Choosing wisely between randomized controlled trials and observational designs in studies about interventions.在有关干预措施的研究中，在随机对照试验和观察性设计之间做出明智选择。
J Bras Pneumol. 2016 May-Jun;42(3):165. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37562016000000152.
4
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Recenti Prog Med. 2019 Nov;110(11):531. doi: 10.1701/3265.32352.
5
Propensity scores: a tool to help quantify treatment effects in observational studies.倾向评分：一种有助于量化观察性研究中治疗效果的工具。
J Bras Pneumol. 2017 Mar-Apr;43(2):86. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37562017000000099.
6
Observational Studies That Seek to Emulate a Randomized Trial of Screening to Reduce the Incidence of Cancer: Do They Address the Question to Which We'd Like to Have an Answer?旨在模拟随机试验以筛查降低癌症发病率的观察性研究：它们是否回答了我们希望得到答案的问题？
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Oct 1;188(10):1761-1763. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy286.
7
Challenges of Assessing Therapeutic or Diagnostic Outcomes with Observational Data.利用观察性数据评估治疗或诊断结果的挑战。
Am J Med. 2018 Feb;131(2):206-210. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.10.027. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
8
What effect is really being measured? An alternative explanation of paradoxical phenomena in studies of osteoarthritis progression.真正测量的是什么效应？骨关节炎进展研究中矛盾现象的另一种解释。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 May;66(5):658-61. doi: 10.1002/acr.22213.
9
Adjusting for observable selection bias in block randomized trials.在整群随机试验中调整可观察到的选择偏倚。
Stat Med. 2005 May 30;24(10):1537-46. doi: 10.1002/sim.2058.
10
Brief Report: Negative Controls to Detect Selection Bias and Measurement Bias in Epidemiologic Studies.简要报告：用于检测流行病学研究中选择偏倚和测量偏倚的阴性对照
Epidemiology. 2016 Sep;27(5):637-41. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000504.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging data science and machine learning for urban climate adaptation in two major African cities: a HEAT Center study protocol.利用数据科学和机器学习促进两个主要非洲城市的城市气候适应：HEAT 中心研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 18;14(6):e077529. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077529.
2
A Validation of Methods for the Evaluation of Observational Studies of Screening Mammography: An Exploratory Analysis Based on Simulating Screening Cohorts.乳腺钼靶筛查观察性研究评估方法的验证：基于模拟筛查队列的探索性分析
Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Oct 27;12:1161-1169. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S267584. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of time to death after distant recurrence in breast cancer patients.乳腺癌远处复发后死亡时间的预测因素。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan;173(2):465-474. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-5002-9. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
2
Association of the Timing of Pregnancy With Survival in Women With Breast Cancer.妊娠时机与乳腺癌女性生存的关联。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 May 1;3(5):659-665. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0248.
3
Bilateral Oophorectomy and Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.BRCA1和BRCA2突变携带者的双侧卵巢切除术与乳腺癌风险
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Sep 6;109(1). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw177. Print 2017 Jan.
4
Breast cancer risk after salpingo-oophorectomy in healthy BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: revisiting the evidence for risk reduction.BRCA1/2 基因突变携带者行输卵管卵巢切除术（切除输卵管和卵巢）后的乳腺癌风险：重新审视降低风险的证据。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Mar 18;107(5). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv033. Print 2015 May.
5
Impact of screening mammography on mortality from breast cancer before age 60 in women 40 to 49 years of age.40 至 49 岁女性中，筛查性乳腺 X 光检查对 60 岁前乳腺癌死亡率的影响。
Curr Oncol. 2014 Oct;21(5):217-21. doi: 10.3747/co.21.2067.
6
How best to determine the mortality benefit from screening mammography: dueling results and methodologies from Canada.如何最好地确定乳腺钼靶筛查的死亡率获益：来自加拿大的相悖结果和方法
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Oct 1;106(11). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju317. Print 2014 Nov.
7
Pan-Canadian study of mammography screening and mortality from breast cancer.加拿大全国范围的乳腺 X 线筛查与乳腺癌死亡率研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Oct 1;106(11). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju261. Print 2014 Nov.
8
Breast cancer risk following bilateral oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: an international case-control study.BRCA1和BRCA2突变携带者双侧卵巢切除术后的乳腺癌风险：一项国际病例对照研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 20;23(30):7491-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.7138.

Countercurrents: The bias of choice.

作者信息

Narod S A

机构信息

Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, and Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2019 Dec;26(6):e712-e713. doi: 10.3747/co.26.5165. Epub 2019 Dec 1.

DOI:10.3747/co.26.5165
PMID:31896940
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6927780/
Abstract
摘要