• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A retrospective observational study to estimate the attrition of patients across lines of systemic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer in Canada.一项回顾性观察研究,旨在估计加拿大转移性结直肠癌系统治疗线间患者的流失情况。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Dec;26(6):e748-e754. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4861. Epub 2019 Dec 1.
2
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Sequences of the Use of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors for Wild-Type KRAS Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.表皮生长因子受体抑制剂用于野生型KRAS不可切除转移性结直肠癌不同用药顺序的成本效益分析
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Jun;12(6):e710-23. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.008730. Epub 2016 May 3.
3
Previous Bevacizumab and Efficacy of Later Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antibodies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From a Large International Registry.贝伐珠单抗治疗既往史和转移性结直肠癌患者后续抗表皮生长因子受体抗体疗效:来自大型国际注册研究的结果。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Sep;17(3):e593-e599. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
4
Randomized phase III study of panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.一项比较帕尼单抗联合氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙和伊立替康(FOLFIRI)与单独 FOLFIRI 二线治疗转移性结直肠癌患者的随机 III 期研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov 1;28(31):4706-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.6055. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
5
Effect of First-Line Chemotherapy Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab on Overall Survival in Patients With KRAS Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.一线化疗联合西妥昔单抗或贝伐单抗对KRAS野生型晚期或转移性结直肠癌患者总生存期的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Jun 20;317(23):2392-2401. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7105.
6
Activating KRAS mutations and overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor as independent predictors in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab.KRAS 基因突变激活和表皮生长因子受体过表达是西妥昔单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌患者的独立预测指标。
Ann Surg. 2010 Feb;251(2):254-60. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bc9d96.
7
Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status.西妥昔单抗联合伊立替康、氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸钙作为转移性结直肠癌的一线治疗:根据肿瘤 KRAS 和 BRAF 突变状态更新的总生存分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 20;29(15):2011-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.5091. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of selective first-line use of biologics for unresectable wild-type left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer.不可切除的野生型左侧转移性结直肠癌一线选择性使用生物制剂的成本效益分析。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(5):e597-e609. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4843. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
9
FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer-subgroup analysis of patients with KRAS: mutated tumours in the randomised German AIO study KRK-0306.FOLFIRI 联合西妥昔单抗与 FOLFIRI 联合贝伐珠单抗一线治疗转移性结直肠癌患者:KRAS 突变肿瘤患者的随机德国 AIO 研究 KRK-0306 亚组分析。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Jul;23(7):1693-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr571. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
10
FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.FOLFIRI 联合西妥昔单抗与 FOLFIRI 联合贝伐珠单抗一线治疗转移性结直肠癌患者(FIRE-3):一项随机、开放标签、III 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Sep;15(10):1065-75. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70330-4. Epub 2014 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes based on RAS/BRAF status in metastatic colorectal cancer-Analysis of the Prospective Dutch Colorectal Cancer cohort.基于RAS/BRAF状态的转移性结直肠癌真实世界治疗模式及结局——对荷兰前瞻性结直肠癌队列的分析
Int J Cancer. 2025 Aug 1;157(3):513-525. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35410. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
2
Late-line options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a review and evidence-based algorithm.转移性结直肠癌患者的晚期治疗选择:综述与循证算法
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2025 Jan;22(1):28-45. doi: 10.1038/s41571-024-00965-0. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
3
Cancer care treatment attrition in adults: Measurement approaches and inequities in patient dropout rates - a rapid review.成人癌症治疗中的流失:患者脱落率的测量方法和不公平现象——快速综述。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Nov 1;24(1):1345. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13096-7.
4
Real-World Cost Effectiveness of a Policy of KRAS Testing to Inform Cetuximab or Panitumumab for Third-Line Therapy of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in British Columbia, Canada.加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省KRAS检测策略指导西妥昔单抗或帕尼单抗用于转移性结直肠癌三线治疗的真实世界成本效益分析
Pharmacoecon Open. 2023 Nov;7(6):997-1006. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00444-9. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
5
Real-World Study to Assess Patterns of Treatment Practices and Clinical Outcomes in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients with Wild-Type Left-Sided Tumours in Canada.评估加拿大野生型左侧肿瘤转移性结直肠癌患者治疗模式和临床结局的真实世界研究。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Sep 6;30(9):8220-8232. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30090596.
6
Canadian Consensus for Biomarker Testing and Treatment of TRK Fusion Cancer in Adults.加拿大成人 TRK 融合癌生物标志物检测和治疗共识。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Jan 15;28(1):523-548. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28010053.

本文引用的文献

1
Panitumumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer and patterns of RAS testing: results from a Europe-wide physician survey and medical records review.帕尼单抗在转移性结直肠癌中的应用及 RAS 检测模式:一项欧洲范围的医生调查和病历回顾研究结果。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):798. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3740-4.
2
Primary tumor sidedness has an impact on prognosis and treatment outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer: results from two randomized first-line panitumumab studies.原发肿瘤侧别对转移性结直肠癌的预后和治疗结果有影响:来自两项随机一线帕尼单抗研究的结果。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1862-1868. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx119.
3
Patterns of practice with third-line anti-EGFR antibody for metastatic colorectal cancer.转移性结直肠癌三线抗表皮生长因子受体抗体的治疗模式
Curr Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(5):329-333. doi: 10.3747/co.23.3030. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
4
Prognostic and Predictive Relevance of Primary Tumor Location in Patients With RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Retrospective Analyses of the CRYSTAL and FIRE-3 Trials.RAS野生型转移性结直肠癌患者中原发肿瘤部位的预后和预测相关性:CRYSTAL和FIRE-3试验的回顾性分析
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Feb 1;3(2):194-201. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3797.
5
Primary Tumor Sidedness as Prognostic and Predictive Biomarker in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Further Validation of a Potentially Practice-Changing Variable.原发性肿瘤部位作为转移性结直肠癌的预后和预测生物标志物:对一个可能改变临床实践的变量的进一步验证
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Feb 1;3(2):165-166. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3777.
6
Population-Based Patterns and Factors Associated With Underuse of Palliative Systemic Therapy in Elderly Patients With Metastatic Colon Cancer.老年转移性结肠癌患者姑息性全身治疗使用不足的基于人群的模式及相关因素
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017 Jun;16(2):147-153. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
7
Clinical Practice Patterns in Chemotherapeutic Treatment Regimens for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.转移性结直肠癌化疗治疗方案的临床实践模式
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016 Jun;15(2):135-40. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2015.10.003. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
8
Panitumumab Use in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Patterns of KRAS Testing: Results from a Europe-Wide Physician Survey and Medical Records Review.帕尼单抗在转移性结直肠癌中的应用及KRAS检测模式:一项全欧洲医生调查和病历审查的结果
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 22;10(10):e0140717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140717. eCollection 2015.
9
Chemotherapy usage patterns in a US-wide cohort of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.美国转移性结直肠癌患者队列中的化疗使用模式。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Feb;106(2):djt371. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt371.
10
Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer initially treated with FOLFOX-bevacizumab or FOLFIRI-bevacizumab: results from ARIES, a bevacizumab observational cohort study.贝伐珠单抗联合 FOLFOX 或 FOLFIRI 一线治疗转移性结直肠癌患者的治疗模式和临床结局:来自贝伐珠单抗观察性队列研究 ARIES 的结果。
Oncologist. 2012;17(12):1486-95. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0190. Epub 2012 Sep 26.

一项回顾性观察研究,旨在估计加拿大转移性结直肠癌系统治疗线间患者的流失情况。

A retrospective observational study to estimate the attrition of patients across lines of systemic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer in Canada.

机构信息

Virginia Mason Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, U.S.A.

Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2019 Dec;26(6):e748-e754. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4861. Epub 2019 Dec 1.

DOI:10.3747/co.26.4861
PMID:31896945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6927777/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Selection and sequencing of treatment regimens for individual patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc) is driven by maintaining reasonable quality of life and extending survival, as well as by access to and cost of therapies. The objectives of the present study were to describe, for patients with mcrc, attrition across lines of systemic therapy, patterns of therapy and their timing, and status.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review at 6 Canadian academic centres included sequential patients who were diagnosed with mcrc from 1 January 2009 onward and who initiated first-line systemic treatment for mcrc between 1 January and 31 December 2009. Death was included as a competing risk in the analysis.

RESULTS

The analysis included 200 patients who started first-line therapy. The proportions of patients who started second-, third-, and fourth-line systemic therapy were 70%, 30%, and 15% respectively. Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab was the most common first-line combination (66%). The most common first-line regimen was folfiri plus bevacizumab. testing was performed in 103 patients (52%), and 38 of 68 patients (56%, 19% overall) with confirmed wild-type tumours received an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (egfri), which was more common in later lines. Most testing occurred after initiation of second-line therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In the modern treatment era, a high proportion of patients receive at least two lines of therapy for mcrc, but only 19% receive egfri therapy. Earlier testing and therapy with an egfri might allow a greater proportion of patients to access all 5 active treatment agents.

摘要

背景

转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的治疗方案选择和排序取决于维持合理的生活质量和延长生存时间,以及治疗方法的可及性和成本。本研究的目的是描述 mCRC 患者的系统治疗线数、治疗模式及其时间安排和状态。

方法

在加拿大 6 个学术中心进行了回顾性病历审查,纳入了自 2009 年 1 月 1 日起诊断为 mCRC 的连续患者,以及自 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间开始一线 mCRC 系统治疗的患者。死亡被纳入分析中的竞争风险。

结果

该分析纳入了 200 名开始一线治疗的患者。开始二线、三线和四线系统治疗的患者比例分别为 70%、30%和 15%。化疗加贝伐珠单抗是最常见的一线联合治疗方案(66%)。最常见的一线方案是 FOLFIRI 加贝伐珠单抗。103 名患者(52%)进行了 检测,68 名确认 野生型肿瘤患者中有 38 名(56%,总体 19%)接受了表皮生长因子受体抑制剂(EGFRi)治疗,后者在后期更为常见。大多数 检测是在二线治疗开始后进行的。

结论

在现代治疗时代,很大比例的 mCRC 患者接受了至少两种治疗方案,但只有 19%的患者接受了 EGFRi 治疗。更早的 检测和 EGFRi 治疗可能使更多的患者能够获得所有 5 种有效治疗药物。