• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patterns of practice with third-line anti-EGFR antibody for metastatic colorectal cancer.转移性结直肠癌三线抗表皮生长因子受体抗体的治疗模式
Curr Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(5):329-333. doi: 10.3747/co.23.3030. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
2
A retrospective observational study to estimate the attrition of patients across lines of systemic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer in Canada.一项回顾性观察研究,旨在估计加拿大转移性结直肠癌系统治疗线间患者的流失情况。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Dec;26(6):e748-e754. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4861. Epub 2019 Dec 1.
3
KRAS Testing for Anti-EGFR Therapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: An Evidence-Based and Economic Analysis.晚期结直肠癌抗表皮生长因子受体治疗的KRAS检测:基于证据的经济分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(25):1-49. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
4
Panitumumab monotherapy compared with cetuximab and irinotecan combination therapy in patients with previously treated KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.帕尼单抗单药治疗与西妥昔单抗和伊立替康联合治疗经治 KRAS 野生型转移性结直肠癌患者的比较。
Curr Oncol. 2013 Dec;20(6):326-32. doi: 10.3747/co.20.1600.
5
Sequential therapy with bevacizumab and EGFR inhibitors for metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a national registry-based analysis.贝伐单抗与表皮生长因子受体抑制剂序贯治疗转移性结直肠癌:一项基于全国登记处的分析。
Cancer Manag Res. 2018 Dec 28;11:359-368. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S183093. eCollection 2019.
6
Evaluating the Optimal Sequence of Treatment With EGFR Inhibitors and Bevacizumab in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.评估RAS野生型转移性结直肠癌中表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)抑制剂与贝伐单抗的最佳治疗顺序
Cureus. 2022 Mar 27;14(3):e23543. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23543. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
CMAB009 plus irinotecan versus irinotecan-only as second-line treatment after fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin failure in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients: promising findings from a prospective, open-label, randomized, phase III trial.CMAB009 联合伊立替康对比伊立替康单药二线治疗氟尿嘧啶和奥沙利铂失败的 KRAS 野生型转移性结直肠癌患者:一项前瞻性、开放标签、随机、III 期试验的有前途的结果。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2019 May 24;39(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40880-019-0374-8.
8
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.西妥昔单抗(单药或联合化疗)、贝伐珠单抗(联合非奥沙利铂化疗)和帕尼单抗(单药治疗)用于一线化疗后转移性结直肠癌治疗的临床疗效和成本效果评价(技术评估 150 号报告的部分回顾和技术评估 118 号报告的综述):系统评价和经济模型。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Apr;17(14):1-237. doi: 10.3310/hta17140.
9
Adverse Reaction to Cetuximab, an Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor.表皮生长因子受体抑制剂西妥昔单抗的不良反应
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2016 Apr;24(1):70-2.
10
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Sequences of the Use of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors for Wild-Type KRAS Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.表皮生长因子受体抑制剂用于野生型KRAS不可切除转移性结直肠癌不同用药顺序的成本效益分析
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Jun;12(6):e710-23. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.008730. Epub 2016 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-World Cost Effectiveness of a Policy of KRAS Testing to Inform Cetuximab or Panitumumab for Third-Line Therapy of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in British Columbia, Canada.加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省KRAS检测策略指导西妥昔单抗或帕尼单抗用于转移性结直肠癌三线治疗的真实世界成本效益分析
Pharmacoecon Open. 2023 Nov;7(6):997-1006. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00444-9. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
2
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Treatment Timing does not Impact Survival in Stage 4 Colon Cancer Treatment: A Retrospective Study.表皮生长因子受体抑制剂治疗时机对IV期结肠癌治疗生存率无影响:一项回顾性研究
Kans J Med. 2022 Aug 22;15(2):273-277. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol15.15975. eCollection 2022.
3
A retrospective observational study to estimate the attrition of patients across lines of systemic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer in Canada.一项回顾性观察研究,旨在估计加拿大转移性结直肠癌系统治疗线间患者的流失情况。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Dec;26(6):e748-e754. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4861. Epub 2019 Dec 1.
4
Role of real-world evidence in informing cancer care: lessons from colorectal cancer.真实世界证据在癌症治疗中的作用:结直肠癌的经验教训。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Nov;26(Suppl 1):S53-S56. doi: 10.3747/co.26.5625. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
5
Methods of sample size calculation in descriptive retrospective burden of illness studies.描述性回顾性疾病负担研究中的样本量计算方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 9;19(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0657-9.
6
Treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and poor performance status: current evidence and challenges.转移性结直肠癌且体能状态较差患者的治疗:当前证据与挑战
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2018 Sep 21;73(suppl 1):e542s. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2018/e542s.

本文引用的文献

1
FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.FOLFIRI 联合西妥昔单抗与 FOLFIRI 联合贝伐珠单抗一线治疗转移性结直肠癌患者(FIRE-3):一项随机、开放标签、III 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Sep;15(10):1065-75. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70330-4. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
2
PEAK: a randomized, multicenter phase II study of panitumumab plus modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer.PEAK:一项随机、多中心的 II 期研究,评估帕尼单抗联合改良氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙和奥沙利铂(mFOLFOX6)或贝伐珠单抗联合 mFOLFOX6 治疗既往未经治疗、不可切除、野生型 KRAS 外显子 2 转移性结直肠癌患者的疗效。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jul 20;32(21):2240-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.2473. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
3
Panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer.帕尼单抗联合 FOLFOX4 治疗与结直肠癌的 RAS 突变。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 12;369(11):1023-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1305275.
4
FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer-subgroup analysis of patients with KRAS: mutated tumours in the randomised German AIO study KRK-0306.FOLFIRI 联合西妥昔单抗与 FOLFIRI 联合贝伐珠单抗一线治疗转移性结直肠癌患者:KRAS 突变肿瘤患者的随机德国 AIO 研究 KRK-0306 亚组分析。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Jul;23(7):1693-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr571. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
5
Survival for metastatic colorectal cancer in the bevacizumab era: a population-based analysis.贝伐珠单抗时代转移性结直肠癌的生存情况:基于人群的分析。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2011 Jun;10(2):97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2011.03.004. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
6
Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status.西妥昔单抗联合伊立替康、氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸钙作为转移性结直肠癌的一线治疗:根据肿瘤 KRAS 和 BRAF 突变状态更新的总生存分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 20;29(15):2011-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.5091. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
7
Efficacy according to biomarker status of cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the OPUS study.根据生物标志物状态评估西妥昔单抗联合 FOLFOX-4 一线治疗转移性结直肠癌的疗效:OPUS 研究。
Ann Oncol. 2011 Jul;22(7):1535-1546. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq632. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
8
Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study.随机、III 期临床试验:帕尼单抗联合氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙和奥沙利铂(FOLFOX4)对比 FOLFOX4 一线治疗未经治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者:PRIME 研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov 1;28(31):4697-705. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.4860. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
9
Disparities in the use of chemotherapy and monoclonal antibody therapy for elderly advanced colorectal cancer patients in the community oncology setting.社区肿瘤环境中老年晚期结直肠癌患者化疗和单克隆抗体治疗使用情况的差异。
Oncologist. 2008 Aug;13(8):876-85. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0061. Epub 2008 Aug 11.
10
Phase II study of uracil-tegafur with leucovorin in elderly (> or = 75 years old) patients with colorectal cancer: ECOG 1299.老年(≥75岁)结直肠癌患者使用尿嘧啶替加氟联合亚叶酸钙的II期研究:ECOG 1299
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec 1;25(34):5397-402. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.4521.

转移性结直肠癌三线抗表皮生长因子受体抗体的治疗模式

Patterns of practice with third-line anti-EGFR antibody for metastatic colorectal cancer.

作者信息

Ho M Y, Renouf D J, Cheung W Y, Lim H J, Speers C H, Zhou C, Kennecke H F

机构信息

Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.

BC Cancer Agency and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(5):329-333. doi: 10.3747/co.23.3030. Epub 2016 Oct 25.

DOI:10.3747/co.23.3030
PMID:27803597
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5081009/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Therapy with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (egfr) monoclonal antibody improves outcomes for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc) in the first-, second-, and third-line trial settings. In British Columbia, the use of egfr inhibitors (egfris) is confined to third-line therapy, which might lower the proportion of patients who receive this therapy. The objective of the present study was to describe egfri treatment patterns when those agents are limited to the third-line setting. The results will inform decisions about optimal use of egfri agents, including earlier in the course of therapy for metastatic disease.

METHODS

All patients with newly diagnosed mcrc who were referred to BC Cancer Agency clinics in 2009 were included in the study. Prognostic and treatment information was prospectively collected; test results were determined by chart review.

RESULTS

The study included 443 patients with a median age of 66 years. For the 321 patients who received systemic therapy, median survival was 22.3 months. Of the 117 patients who were treated with 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, and who were potentially eligible for egfri therapy, 90% (105 patients) were tested for status. Of the 60 patients with wild-type tumours, 82% (49 patients) received egfri therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

When egfri therapy is limited to the third-line setting, only a small proportion of patients receive such therapy, with death and poor performance status preventing its use in the rest. Availability of egfri in earlier lines of therapy could increase the proportion of patients treated with all active systemic agents.

摘要

背景

在一线、二线和三线试验环境中,抗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)单克隆抗体治疗可改善转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的预后。在不列颠哥伦比亚省,EGFR抑制剂(EGFRIs)的使用仅限于三线治疗,这可能会降低接受该治疗的患者比例。本研究的目的是描述当这些药物仅限于三线治疗时EGFRIs的治疗模式。研究结果将为关于EGFRIs药物最佳使用的决策提供信息,包括在转移性疾病治疗过程中更早使用。

方法

纳入2009年转诊至不列颠哥伦比亚癌症机构诊所的所有新诊断mCRC患者。前瞻性收集预后和治疗信息;通过病历审查确定检测结果。

结果

该研究纳入了443例患者,中位年龄为66岁。对于接受全身治疗的321例患者,中位生存期为22.3个月。在117例接受5-氟尿嘧啶、奥沙利铂和伊立替康治疗且可能符合EGFRIs治疗条件的患者中,90%(105例患者)进行了状态检测。在60例野生型肿瘤患者中,82%(49例患者)接受了EGFRIs治疗。

结论

当EGFRIs治疗仅限于三线治疗时,只有一小部分患者接受该治疗,死亡和较差的身体状况使其余患者无法使用。在更早的治疗线中提供EGFRIs可能会增加接受所有有效全身药物治疗的患者比例。