• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用模拟教学进行根本原因分析:课程与成果

Teaching Root Cause Analysis Using Simulation: Curriculum and Outcomes.

作者信息

Aboumrad Maya, Neily Julia, Watts Bradley V

机构信息

National Center for Patient Safety, White River Junction, VT, USA.

White River Junction Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, USA.

出版信息

J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2019 Dec 18;6:2382120519894270. doi: 10.1177/2382120519894270. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/2382120519894270
PMID:31897434
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6920588/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinicians are key drivers for improving health care quality and safety. However, some may lack experience in quality improvement and patient safety (QI/PS) methodologies, including root cause analysis (RCA).

OBJECTIVE

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) sought to develop a simulation approach to teach clinicians from the VA's Chief Resident in Quality and Safety program about RCA. We report the use of experiential learning to teach RCA, and clinicians' preparedness to conduct and teach RCA post-training. We provide curriculum details and materials to be adapted for widespread use.

METHODS

The course was designed to meet the learning objectives through simulation. We developed course materials, including presentations, a role-playing case, and an elaborate RCA case. Learning objectives included (1) basic structure of RCA, (2) process flow diagramming, (3) collecting information for RCA, (4) cause and effect diagramming, and (5) identifying actions and outcomes. We administered a voluntary, web-based survey in November 2016 to participants (N = 114) post-training to assess their competency with RCA.

RESULTS

A total of 93 individuals completed the survey of the 114 invited to participate, culminating an 82% response rate. Nearly all respondents (99%, N = 92) reported feeling at least moderately to extremely prepared to conduct and teach RCA post-training. Most respondents reported feeling very to extremely prepared to conduct and teach RCA (77%, N = 72).

CONCLUSIONS

Experiential learning involving simulations may be effective to improve clinicians' competency in QI/PS practices, including RCA. Further research is warranted to understand how the training affects clinicians' capacity to participate in real RCA teams post-training, as well as applicability to other disciplines and interdisciplinary teams.

摘要

背景

临床医生是提高医疗质量和安全的关键推动因素。然而,有些人可能缺乏质量改进和患者安全(QI/PS)方法的经验,包括根本原因分析(RCA)。

目的

退伍军人事务部(VA)试图开发一种模拟方法,向VA质量与安全首席住院医师项目的临床医生传授RCA。我们报告了使用体验式学习来教授RCA,以及临床医生在培训后进行和教授RCA的准备情况。我们提供课程细节和材料以供广泛使用。

方法

该课程旨在通过模拟实现学习目标。我们开发了课程材料,包括演示文稿、角色扮演案例和详细的RCA案例。学习目标包括:(1)RCA的基本结构;(2)流程流程图绘制;(3)为RCA收集信息;(4)因果关系图绘制;(5)确定行动和结果。2016年11月,我们对参与者(N = 114)进行了一项基于网络的自愿调查,以评估他们在培训后进行RCA的能力。

结果

在受邀参加的114人中,共有93人完成了调查,最终回复率为82%。几乎所有受访者(99%,N = 92)表示,在培训后至少有中等至极高的准备程度来进行和教授RCA。大多数受访者表示有非常高至极高的准备程度来进行和教授RCA(77%,N = 72)。

结论

涉及模拟的体验式学习可能有效地提高临床医生在QI/PS实践(包括RCA)方面的能力。有必要进一步研究,以了解该培训如何影响临床医生在培训后参与实际RCA团队的能力,以及对其他学科和跨学科团队的适用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f0f/6920588/6baf20a41f56/10.1177_2382120519894270-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f0f/6920588/f43364d81b8f/10.1177_2382120519894270-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f0f/6920588/6baf20a41f56/10.1177_2382120519894270-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f0f/6920588/f43364d81b8f/10.1177_2382120519894270-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f0f/6920588/6baf20a41f56/10.1177_2382120519894270-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Teaching Root Cause Analysis Using Simulation: Curriculum and Outcomes.使用模拟教学进行根本原因分析:课程与成果
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2019 Dec 18;6:2382120519894270. doi: 10.1177/2382120519894270. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
2
Rapid Root Cause Analysis: Improving OBGYN Resident Exposure to Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Curricula.快速根本原因分析:提高妇产科住院医师参与质量改进和患者安全课程的程度
Cureus. 2024 Mar 25;16(3):e56881. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56881. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Using a Root Cause Analysis Curriculum for Practice-Based Learning and Improvement in General Surgery Residency.在普通外科住院医师培训中,使用基于根本原因分析的课程进行实践学习与改进。
J Surg Educ. 2015 Nov-Dec;72(6):e286-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
4
Chief of Residents for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety: A Recipe for a New Role in Graduate Medical Education.质量改进与患者安全住院总医师:研究生医学教育新角色的秘诀
Mil Med. 2017 Mar;182(3):e1747-e1751. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00179.
5
Training health care professionals in root cause analysis: a cross-sectional study of post-training experiences, benefits and attitudes.培训医疗保健专业人员进行根本原因分析:一项关于培训后经验、收益和态度的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Feb 7;13:50. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-50.
6
Creating Patient Safety Team Members Through a Simulation-Based Interprofessional Root Cause Analysis Course.通过基于模拟的跨专业根本原因分析课程创建患者安全团队成员。
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Jun;14(3):304-310. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-00712.1. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
7
Career Impact of the Chief Resident in Quality and Safety Training Program: An Alumni Evaluation.住院总医师在质量和安全培训计划中的职业影响:校友评估。
Acad Med. 2020 Feb;95(2):269-274. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002938.
8
A Tale of Four Programs: How Residents Learn About Quality Improvement during Postgraduate Medical Education at the University of Calgary.四个项目的故事:卡尔加里大学研究生医学教育期间住院医师如何学习质量改进
Teach Learn Med. 2021 Aug-Sep;33(4):390-406. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1847652. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
9
The Mystery Dinner RCA: Using Gamification and Simulation to Teach Root Cause Analysis.RCA 神秘晚宴:运用游戏化和模拟教学进行根本原因分析。
MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Jun 21;17:11165. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11165.
10
Developing a tool for assessing competency in root cause analysis.开发一种用于评估根本原因分析能力的工具。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Jan;35(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(09)35006-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Career impact of the national interprofessional fellowship in patient safety: an alumni evaluation.全国患者安全跨专业奖学金对职业发展的影响:校友评估
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jun 4;14(2):e003090. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003090.
2
Educational needs for medication safety competence among nurses by clinical ladder stage.护士按临床职称阶段划分的用药安全能力教育需求。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 16;20(4):e0319483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319483. eCollection 2025.
3
Developing surgical and anesthesia resident patient safety competencies through systems-based event analysis. Guide to curricular development and evaluation of longer-term resident perceptions.

本文引用的文献

1
Root Cause Analysis of Oncology Adverse Events in the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人健康管理局肿瘤不良事件根本原因分析。
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Sep;14(9):e579-e590. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00159. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
2
Factors contributing to cancer-related suicide: A study of root-cause analysis reports.导致癌症相关自杀的因素:根本原因分析报告研究。
Psychooncology. 2018 Sep;27(9):2237-2244. doi: 10.1002/pon.4815. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
3
Towards high-reliability organising in healthcare: a strategy for building organisational capacity.
通过基于系统的事件分析培养外科和麻醉住院医师的患者安全能力。课程开发指南及住院医师长期认知评估。
Surg Open Sci. 2023 Sep 14;16:33-36. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.09.007. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Nothing about me without me: a scoping review of how illness experiences inform simulated participants' encounters in health profession education.没有我参与,就没有关于我的事:一项关于疾病经历如何影响健康职业教育中模拟参与者互动的范围综述。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2021 Jun 17;7(6):611-616. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000886. eCollection 2021.
5
Coexisting service-related factors preceding suicide: a network analysis.共存的与服务相关的自杀前因素:网络分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 21;12(4):e050953. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050953.
6
Designing Actionable Solutions and Curriculum for Pain Disparities Education.设计可操作的解决方案和疼痛差异教育课程。
Pain Med. 2022 Feb 1;23(2):288-294. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab289.
7
The Mystery Dinner RCA: Using Gamification and Simulation to Teach Root Cause Analysis.RCA 神秘晚宴:运用游戏化和模拟教学进行根本原因分析。
MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Jun 21;17:11165. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11165.
迈向高可靠性医疗组织:建立组织能力的策略。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Aug;26(8):663-670. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006240. Epub 2017 May 25.
4
Clinical and Educational Outcomes of an Integrated Inpatient Quality Improvement Curriculum for Internal Medicine Residents.内科住院医师综合住院质量改进课程的临床与教育成果
J Grad Med Educ. 2016 Oct;8(4):563-568. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00412.1.
5
How to perform a root cause analysis for workup and future prevention of medical errors: a review.如何对医学检查及未来医疗差错预防进行根本原因分析:综述
Patient Saf Surg. 2016 Sep 21;10:20. doi: 10.1186/s13037-016-0107-8. eCollection 2016.
6
Challenges and Opportunities in the Six Focus Areas: CLER National Report of Findings 2016.六个重点领域的挑战与机遇:2016年临床学习环境审查(CLER)全国调查结果报告
J Grad Med Educ. 2016 May;8(2 Suppl 1):25-34. doi: 10.4300/1949-8349.8.2s1.25.
7
How-I-Do-It: Teaching Root Cause Analysis.
Acad Radiol. 2016 Jul;23(7):881-4. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
8
Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US.医疗差错——美国第三大死因。
BMJ. 2016 May 3;353:i2139. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2139.
9
Department of Veterans Affairs Chief Resident in Quality and Patient Safety Program: A Model to Spread Change.退伍军人事务部质量与患者安全项目主任住院医师:传播变革的一种模式。
Am J Med Qual. 2016 Nov;31(6):598-600. doi: 10.1177/1062860616643403. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
10
Re-examining high reliability: actively organising for safety.重新审视高可靠性:积极组织以确保安全。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Mar;26(3):248-251. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004698. Epub 2016 Mar 21.