Suppr超能文献

评价非热常压等离子体治疗牙周炎的疗效:一项随机对照临床试验。

Evaluation of efficacy of non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma in treatment of periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey.

Private Practice, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Sep;24(9):3133-3145. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03187-2. Epub 2020 Jan 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In this clinical study, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness of non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma (NAPP), which is a novel procedure used in periodontal pocket decontamination adjunctive to non-surgical periodontal treatment (NSPT).

METHODS

The study included 25 systemically healthy periodontitis patients. In the split-mouth design, NAPP application into the pockets, in addition to NSPT, was performed. Clinical periodontal data, gingival crevicular fluid, and subgingival plaque samples of patients were taken before and during the first and third months of treatment. Biochemical assays were conducted using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Analysis of bacteria was performed with polymerase chain reaction method.

RESULTS

There was more clinical attachment level (CAL) gain in the 3rd month in the test group (deep pockets: 3.90 mm, pockets ≥ 5 mm: 2.72 mm) compared to the control group (deep pockets: 3.40 mm, pockets ≥ 5 mm: 2.58 mm) (p < 0.05), but no significant difference between groups in CAL. Clinical periodontal parameters improved in both study groups (p < 0.05). However, the gingival index (GI) and the bleeding on probing (BOP) rate decreased more in the test group (GI: 0.55, BOP: 9.48%, and GI: 0.38, BOP: 8.46% in the 1st and 3rd months, respectively) compared to the control group (GI: 0.68, BOP: 13.43%, and GI: 0.52, BOP: 14.58%) (p < 0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in probing depth and biochemical markers between groups (p > 0.05). It was observed that NAPP reduced the number of bacteria more than the control group in the 1st and 3rd months.

CONCLUSIONS

It was seen that the single-time NAPP application concurrent with NSPT provided additional CAL gain, elimination of putative periodontopathogens and reduced their recolonization. Longitudinal studies with larger population and longer time are required.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

NSPT is an effective method for the treatment of periodontitis but bacteria recolonization that causes recurrence of the periodontal disease occurs within a short period. NAPP can reduce the recurrence of periodontal disease by providing better bacterial elimination and should, therefore, be used in maintenance of periodontitis.

摘要

目的

本临床研究旨在评估非热常压等离子体(NAPP)的有效性,这是一种用于牙周袋去污的新方法,可作为牙周非手术治疗(NSPT)的辅助手段。

方法

该研究纳入了 25 例系统性健康的牙周炎患者。采用分口设计,在进行 NSPT 的同时,将 NAPP 应用于牙周袋中。在治疗的第 1 个月和第 3 个月,采集患者的临床牙周数据、龈沟液和龈下菌斑样本。使用酶联免疫吸附测定法进行生化检测。采用聚合酶链反应方法分析细菌。

结果

与对照组(深袋:3.40mm,袋深≥5mm:2.58mm)相比,试验组(深袋:3.90mm,袋深≥5mm:2.72mm)在第 3 个月的临床附着水平(CAL)增加更多(p<0.05),但两组间 CAL 无显著差异。两组的临床牙周参数均有改善(p<0.05)。然而,试验组的牙龈指数(GI)和探诊出血(BOP)率下降更多(第 1 个月:GI:0.55,BOP:9.48%;第 3 个月:GI:0.38,BOP:8.46%),而对照组(第 1 个月:GI:0.68,BOP:13.43%;第 3 个月:GI:0.52,BOP:14.58%)(p<0.05)。此外,两组间探诊深度和生化标志物无显著差异(p>0.05)。结果显示,在第 1 个月和第 3 个月,NAPP 减少的细菌数量多于对照组。

结论

单次 NAPP 应用联合 NSPT 可提供额外的 CAL 增加,消除潜在的牙周致病菌并减少其再定植。需要进行更大人群和更长时间的纵向研究。

临床意义

NSPT 是治疗牙周炎的有效方法,但在短时间内,引起牙周病复发的细菌再定植会发生。NAPP 通过更好地消除细菌来减少牙周病的复发,因此应在牙周炎的维持治疗中使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验