Hwangpo Tracy, Wang Zhixin, Ghably Jack, Bhatt Surya P, Cui Xiangqin, Schroeder Harry W
Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1825 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
J Clin Immunol. 2020 Feb;40(2):310-320. doi: 10.1007/s10875-019-00730-4. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
Immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IGRT) can protect against lung function decline in CVID. We tested whether increasing IgG dosage was beneficial in patients who exhibited a decline in forced expiratory flow at 25-75% (FEF25-75%) even though they were receiving IgG doses within the therapeutic range. Of 189 CVID patients seen over 12 years, 38 patients met inclusion criteria, were seen on ≥ 3 visits, and demonstrated a ≥ 10% decrease in FEF25-75% from visits 1 to 2. FEF25-75%, forced expiratory flow at 1 s (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC at visit 3 were compared among those with non-dose adjustment (non-DA) versus additional IgG dose adjustment (DA). Three FEF25-75% tiers were identified: top (> 80% predicted), middle (50-80%), and bottom (< 50%). DA and non-DA groups did not differ in clinical infections or bronchodilator use, although the non-DA group tended to use more antibiotics. In the top, normal tier, FEF25-75% increased in DA, but the change did not achieve statistical significance. In the middle moderate obstruction tier, visit 3 FEF25-75% increased among DA but not non-DA sets (11.8 ± 12.4%, p = 0.003 vs. 0.3 ± 9.9%, p = 0.94). Improvement in FEV1/FVC at visit 3 was also significant among DA vs. non-DA (7.2 ± 12.4%, p = 0.04 vs. - 0.2 ± 2.7%, p = 0.85). In the bottom, severe tier, FEF25-75% was unchanged in DA (- 0.5 ± 5.2%, p = 0.79), but increased in non-DA (5.1 ± 5.2%, p = 0.02). Among IGRT CVID patients with moderate but not severe obstruction as assessed by spirometry, increasing IgG dosage led to an increase in FEF25-75% and FEV1/FVC.
免疫球蛋白替代疗法(IGRT)可预防常见变异型免疫缺陷病(CVID)患者的肺功能下降。我们测试了对于即使接受治疗范围内IgG剂量但25%-75%用力呼气流量(FEF25-75%)仍下降的患者,增加IgG剂量是否有益。在12年期间诊治的189例CVID患者中,38例符合纳入标准,就诊≥3次,且FEF25-75%自第1次就诊至第2次就诊下降≥10%。比较了非剂量调整(非DA)组与额外增加IgG剂量调整(DA)组在第3次就诊时的FEF25-75%、1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)和FEV1/FVC。确定了三个FEF25-75%分层:上层(>预测值的80%)、中层(50%-80%)和下层(<50%)。DA组和非DA组在临床感染或支气管扩张剂使用方面无差异,尽管非DA组倾向于使用更多抗生素。在上层正常分层中,DA组的FEF25-75%有所增加,但变化未达到统计学显著性。在中层中度阻塞分层中,DA组第3次就诊时的FEF25-75%增加,而非DA组未增加(11.8±12.4%,p=0.003对比0.3±9.9%,p=0.94)。DA组与非DA组相比,第3次就诊时FEV1/FVC的改善也具有显著性(7.2±12.4%,p=0.04对比-0.2±2.7%,p=0.85)。在下层严重分层中,DA组的FEF25-75%无变化(-0.5±5.2%,p=0.79),而非DA组增加(5.1±