Fondazione Ospedale San Camillo IRCCS, Venezia, Italy; Unità Operativa Medicina Fisica e Riabilitativa, Ulss 3 Serenissisma, Ospedale Civile di Venezia, Italy.
Fondazione Ospedale San Camillo IRCCS, Venezia, Italy.
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2020 Mar;274:103356. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2019.103356. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
There is no standard procedure to evaluated the peak of reflex cough flow (PCF-reflex) in the literature, which is important assessment in subjects with acquired brain injury and tracheostomy cannula. The present study aims to investigate the PCF of the reflex cough in a broad sample of healthy controls and, furthermore, the presence and the strength of voluntary and reflex cough in subjects with ABI with tracheostomy cannula.
We recruited 147 participants including the healthy subjects (n = 105) and acquired brain injury subjects (n = 43), who underwent respiratory assessment: the Tidal Volume, Forced Vital Capacity, PCF of voluntary cough (PCF-voluntary) and PCF-reflex (using a spirometer connected with a nebulizer by a bidirectional).
The PCF-reflex of controls and subjects was significant lower than the PCF-voluntary (P < 0.01). The PCF-voluntary was not assessed in 26 (60.5 %) subjects due to severe cognitive deficit. In subjects without cognitive deficits (n = 17; 39.5 %), it was significantly lower than in healthy controls (p < 0.01). In contrast, the PCF-reflex was completed in all subjects and it was not significantly different from healthy controls. Furthermore, the strength of the PCF-reflex decreased with increasing inhalation numbers of nebulised air.
Reflex cough behaviour differs largely from voluntary cough and the PCF results reflect this great discrepancy. PCF-reflex could be useful parameter for assessing the airway protection whereas PCF-voluntary for measuring airway clearance.
目前文献中尚无评估反射性咳嗽峰值(PCF-reflex)的标准程序,而这对于患有获得性脑损伤和气管切开套管的患者来说是重要的评估指标。本研究旨在调查广泛的健康对照组的反射性咳嗽的 PCF,并进一步研究患有气管切开套管的获得性脑损伤患者的自主和反射性咳嗽的存在和强度。
我们招募了 147 名参与者,包括健康受试者(n=105)和获得性脑损伤受试者(n=43),他们接受了呼吸评估:潮气量、用力肺活量、自主咳嗽的 PCF(PCF-voluntary)和反射性咳嗽的 PCF(使用与通过双向连接的雾化器相连的肺活量计)。
对照组和受试者的 PCF-reflex 明显低于 PCF-voluntary(P<0.01)。由于严重的认知缺陷,26 名(60.5%)受试者无法评估 PCF-voluntary。在没有认知缺陷的受试者(n=17;39.5%)中,它明显低于健康对照组(p<0.01)。相比之下,所有受试者都完成了 PCF-reflex,与健康对照组无显著差异。此外,反射性咳嗽的强度随着雾化空气吸入次数的增加而降低。
反射性咳嗽行为与自主咳嗽有很大不同,PCF 结果反映了这种巨大差异。PCF-reflex 可用于评估气道保护,而 PCF-voluntary 则可用于测量气道清除。