• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解剖或保留上肺叶切除术后下肺韧带的选择:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The choice of dissection or preservation of the inferior pulmonary ligament after an upper lobectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The third affiliated hospital of Soochow University, 185 Juqian street, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu Province, China.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jan 4;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1777-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12957-019-1777-3
PMID:31901232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6942349/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The necessity of the inferior pulmonary ligament (IPL) dissection after an upper lobectomy remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether this accessional procedure could reduce the postoperative complications and improve outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane Library, CBM, and CNKI databases were searched for the relevant studies which compared the dissection with preservation of IPL during the upper lobectomy. The Review Manager 5.3 software was used for this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Three RCTs and five CCTs were included in this meta-analysis. These studies contained a total of 610 patients, in which 315 patients received a pulmonary ligament dissection (group D) after the upper lobectomy, while the other 295 patients preserved the pulmonary ligament (group P). No significant difference was demonstrated between the group D and group P in terms of drainage time after surgery (MD 0.14, 95%CI - 0.05 to 0.33, P = 0.15), rate of postoperative dead space (OR 1.33, 95%CI 0.72 to 2.46, P = 0.36), rate of postoperative complications (OR 1.20, 95%CI 0.66 to 2.19, P = 0.56). However, the pooled comparison revealed a greater change of the right main bronchial angle (MD 5.00, 95%CI 1.68 to 8.33, P = 0.003) in group D compared with group P, indicated that the dissection of IPL may lead to a greater distortion of bronchus.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis confirmed that the dissection of IPL do not effectively reduce the postoperative complications and improve the prognosis. Therefore, it is not necessary to dissect the IPL after an upper lobectomy.

摘要

背景

上肺叶切除术后是否需要解剖下肺韧带(IPL)仍然存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在评估该附加手术是否能减少术后并发症并改善预后。

方法

检索 PubMed、Embase、Ovid、Cochrane 图书馆、CBM 和中国知网数据库,以比较上肺叶切除术中解剖与保留 IPL 的相关研究。使用 Review Manager 5.3 软件进行荟萃分析。

结果

本荟萃分析纳入了 3 项 RCT 和 5 项 CCT。这些研究共纳入 610 例患者,其中 315 例在上肺叶切除术后行肺韧带解剖(D 组),295 例保留肺韧带(P 组)。D 组和 P 组术后引流时间(MD 0.14,95%CI-0.05 至 0.33,P=0.15)、术后残腔发生率(OR 1.33,95%CI 0.72 至 2.46,P=0.36)、术后并发症发生率(OR 1.20,95%CI 0.66 至 2.19,P=0.56)差异均无统计学意义。然而,汇总比较显示 D 组与 P 组相比,右主支气管角的变化更大(MD 5.00,95%CI 1.68 至 8.33,P=0.003),表明 IPL 的解剖可能导致支气管更大的扭曲。

结论

本荟萃分析证实,解剖 IPL 并不能有效减少术后并发症并改善预后。因此,在上肺叶切除术后无需解剖 IPL。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/6942349/9fadaabb329f/12957_2019_1777_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/6942349/166da83e8958/12957_2019_1777_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/6942349/baa2e4a24882/12957_2019_1777_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/6942349/5510d3e59fda/12957_2019_1777_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/6942349/73568c440c43/12957_2019_1777_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/6942349/0f4cf4d504fe/12957_2019_1777_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/6942349/84099547f210/12957_2019_1777_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/6942349/9fadaabb329f/12957_2019_1777_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/6942349/166da83e8958/12957_2019_1777_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/6942349/baa2e4a24882/12957_2019_1777_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/6942349/5510d3e59fda/12957_2019_1777_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/6942349/73568c440c43/12957_2019_1777_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/6942349/0f4cf4d504fe/12957_2019_1777_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/6942349/84099547f210/12957_2019_1777_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/6942349/9fadaabb329f/12957_2019_1777_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The choice of dissection or preservation of the inferior pulmonary ligament after an upper lobectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.解剖或保留上肺叶切除术后下肺韧带的选择:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jan 4;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1777-3.
2
Preservation vs. dissection of inferior pulmonary ligament for thoracoscopic upper lobectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.胸腔镜下肺上叶切除术中下肺韧带的保留与解剖:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct 7;21(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03190-8.
3
Dissection of the pulmonary ligament during upper lobectomy: is it necessary?肺叶切除术中肺韧带的解剖:有必要吗?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Aug;17(2):403-6. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt144. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
4
Effect of inferior pulmonary ligament division on residual lung volume and function after a right upper lobectomy.下肺韧带离断对右上肺叶切除术后残肺容积和功能的影响。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 May 1;28(5):760-766. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivy344.
5
Dividing inferior pulmonary ligament may change the bronchial angle.分离下肺韧带可能会改变支气管角度。
J Surg Res. 2016 Mar;201(1):208-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.09.030. Epub 2015 Oct 17.
6
Division of the pulmonary ligament after upper lobectomy is less effective for the obliteration of dead space than leaving it intact.肺上叶切除术后切断肺韧带在消除死腔方面的效果不如保留肺韧带。
Surg Today. 2004;34(6):498-500. doi: 10.1007/s00595-004-2752-2.
7
Do Japanese thoracic surgeons think that dissection of the pulmonary ligament is necessary after an upper lobectomy?日本胸外科医生是否认为在上肺叶切除术后需要解剖肺韧带?
Surg Today. 2010 Nov;40(11):1097-9. doi: 10.1007/s00595-009-4173-8. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
8
Does the division of the inferior pulmonary ligament in upper lobectomy result in improved short-term clinical outcomes and long-term survival?在上肺叶切除术中分离下肺韧带是否会改善短期临床结局和长期生存?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Nov 8;35(6). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivac272.
9
The impact of dissection of station 9 on survival and the necessity of pulmonary ligament division during upper lobectomy for lung cancer.第9组淋巴结清扫对肺癌上叶切除术后生存的影响及肺韧带离断的必要性
Acta Chir Belg. 2023 Apr;123(2):148-155. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2021.1958189. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
10
Inferior Pulmonary Ligament Division May Be Unnecessary during Left Upper Lobectomy: Effects on Lung Volume, Bronchial Angle and Bronchial Tortuosity.左上肺叶切除术时可能无需进行下肺韧带离断:对肺容积、支气管角度和支气管迂曲度的影响
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 7;10(18):4033. doi: 10.3390/jcm10184033.

引用本文的文献

1
Division of the inferior pulmonary ligament during upper lobectomy does not improve postoperative pulmonary function: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials.肺上叶切除术中下肺韧带离断并不能改善术后肺功能:观察性研究和随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jan 27;23(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03669-6.
2
Inferior pulmonary ligament division during left upper lobectomy causes pulmonary dysfunction.左上肺叶切除术中下肺韧带离断会导致肺功能障碍。
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023 May 4;36(5). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad035.
3
Does the division of the inferior pulmonary ligament in upper lobectomy result in improved short-term clinical outcomes and long-term survival?

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of inferior pulmonary ligament division on residual lung volume and function after a right upper lobectomy.下肺韧带离断对右上肺叶切除术后残肺容积和功能的影响。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 May 1;28(5):760-766. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivy344.
2
Selective lymph node dissection in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.早期非小细胞肺癌的选择性淋巴结清扫术。
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jul;9(7):2102-2107. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.04.
3
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 5.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.
在上肺叶切除术中分离下肺韧带是否会改善短期临床结局和长期生存?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Nov 8;35(6). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivac272.
4
Evaluation of the necessity of Pulmonary Ligament Lymph Node Dissection for Upper Lobe Stage IB NSCLC: A Propensity Score-matched Study.肺韧带淋巴结清扫术在IB期肺上叶非小细胞肺癌中的必要性评估:一项倾向评分匹配研究
J Cancer. 2022 Sep 6;13(11):3244-3250. doi: 10.7150/jca.76108. eCollection 2022.
非小细胞肺癌临床实践指南(2017 年第 5 版),NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Apr;15(4):504-535. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0050.
4
Dividing inferior pulmonary ligament may change the bronchial angle.分离下肺韧带可能会改变支气管角度。
J Surg Res. 2016 Mar;201(1):208-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.09.030. Epub 2015 Oct 17.
5
Patterns of survival and recurrence after surgical treatment of early stage non-small cell lung carcinoma in the ACOSOG Z0030 (ALLIANCE) trial.ACOSOG Z0030(ALLIANCE)试验中外科治疗早期非小细胞肺癌后的生存和复发模式。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):747-52: Discussion 752-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.001. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
6
The effect of postoperative change in bronchial angle on postoperative pulmonary function after upper lobectomy in lung cancer patients.肺癌患者上叶切除术后支气管角度变化对术后肺功能的影响。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Feb;18(2):183-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt463. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
7
Open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: review of a national database.开胸、电视辅助胸腔镜手术和机器人辅助肺叶切除术:国家数据库回顾。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jan;97(1):236-42; discussion 242-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.117. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
8
Dissection of the pulmonary ligament during upper lobectomy: is it necessary?肺叶切除术中肺韧带的解剖:有必要吗?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Aug;17(2):403-6. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt144. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
9
Retrospective analysis of nodal spread patterns according to tumor location in pathological N2 non-small cell lung cancer.回顾性分析病理 N2 期非小细胞肺癌中肿瘤部位与淋巴结转移模式的关系。
World J Surg. 2012 Dec;36(12):2865-71. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1743-5.
10
Do Japanese thoracic surgeons think that dissection of the pulmonary ligament is necessary after an upper lobectomy?日本胸外科医生是否认为在上肺叶切除术后需要解剖肺韧带?
Surg Today. 2010 Nov;40(11):1097-9. doi: 10.1007/s00595-009-4173-8. Epub 2010 Nov 3.