Suppr超能文献

解剖或保留上肺叶切除术后下肺韧带的选择:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The choice of dissection or preservation of the inferior pulmonary ligament after an upper lobectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The third affiliated hospital of Soochow University, 185 Juqian street, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu Province, China.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jan 4;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1777-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The necessity of the inferior pulmonary ligament (IPL) dissection after an upper lobectomy remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether this accessional procedure could reduce the postoperative complications and improve outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane Library, CBM, and CNKI databases were searched for the relevant studies which compared the dissection with preservation of IPL during the upper lobectomy. The Review Manager 5.3 software was used for this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Three RCTs and five CCTs were included in this meta-analysis. These studies contained a total of 610 patients, in which 315 patients received a pulmonary ligament dissection (group D) after the upper lobectomy, while the other 295 patients preserved the pulmonary ligament (group P). No significant difference was demonstrated between the group D and group P in terms of drainage time after surgery (MD 0.14, 95%CI - 0.05 to 0.33, P = 0.15), rate of postoperative dead space (OR 1.33, 95%CI 0.72 to 2.46, P = 0.36), rate of postoperative complications (OR 1.20, 95%CI 0.66 to 2.19, P = 0.56). However, the pooled comparison revealed a greater change of the right main bronchial angle (MD 5.00, 95%CI 1.68 to 8.33, P = 0.003) in group D compared with group P, indicated that the dissection of IPL may lead to a greater distortion of bronchus.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis confirmed that the dissection of IPL do not effectively reduce the postoperative complications and improve the prognosis. Therefore, it is not necessary to dissect the IPL after an upper lobectomy.

摘要

背景

上肺叶切除术后是否需要解剖下肺韧带(IPL)仍然存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在评估该附加手术是否能减少术后并发症并改善预后。

方法

检索 PubMed、Embase、Ovid、Cochrane 图书馆、CBM 和中国知网数据库,以比较上肺叶切除术中解剖与保留 IPL 的相关研究。使用 Review Manager 5.3 软件进行荟萃分析。

结果

本荟萃分析纳入了 3 项 RCT 和 5 项 CCT。这些研究共纳入 610 例患者,其中 315 例在上肺叶切除术后行肺韧带解剖(D 组),295 例保留肺韧带(P 组)。D 组和 P 组术后引流时间(MD 0.14,95%CI-0.05 至 0.33,P=0.15)、术后残腔发生率(OR 1.33,95%CI 0.72 至 2.46,P=0.36)、术后并发症发生率(OR 1.20,95%CI 0.66 至 2.19,P=0.56)差异均无统计学意义。然而,汇总比较显示 D 组与 P 组相比,右主支气管角的变化更大(MD 5.00,95%CI 1.68 至 8.33,P=0.003),表明 IPL 的解剖可能导致支气管更大的扭曲。

结论

本荟萃分析证实,解剖 IPL 并不能有效减少术后并发症并改善预后。因此,在上肺叶切除术后无需解剖 IPL。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b9/6942349/166da83e8958/12957_2019_1777_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验