Suppr超能文献

重大手术后的重症监护:对计划性入院风险因素的系统回顾。

Critical care after major surgery: a systematic review of risk factors for unplanned admission.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's & St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2020 Jan;75 Suppl 1:e62-e74. doi: 10.1111/anae.14793.

Abstract

Critical care admission may be necessary for surgical patients requiring organ support or invasive monitoring in the peri-operative period. Unplanned critical care admission poses a potential risk to patients and pressure on services. Existing guidelines base admission criteria on predicted risk of 30-day mortality; however, this may not provide the best predictor of which patients would benefit from this service, and how unplanned admission might be avoided. A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, the Cochrane database and the grey literature identified 44 studies assessing risk factors for unplanned critical care admission in adult populations undergoing non-cardiac, non-thoracic and non-neurological surgery. Comparative, quantitative analysis of the admission criteria was not feasible due to heterogeneity in study design. Age, anaemia, ASA physical status, body mass index, comorbidity burden, emergency surgery, high-risk surgery, male sex, obstructive sleep apnoea, increased blood loss and operative duration were all independent risk factors for unplanned critical care admission. Age, body mass index, comorbidity extent and emergency surgery were the most common independent risk factors identified in the USA, UK, Asia and Australia. These risk factors could be used in the development of a risk tool or decision tree for determining which patients might benefit from planned critical care admission. Future work should involve testing the sensitivity and specificity of these measures, either alone or in combination, to guide planned critical care admission, reduce patient deterioration and unplanned admissions.

摘要

对于在围手术期需要器官支持或有创监测的外科患者,可能需要入住重症监护病房。非计划性入住重症监护病房会对患者构成潜在风险,并给服务带来压力。现有的指南将入住标准基于 30 天死亡率的预测风险;然而,这可能无法提供最佳预测指标,无法预测哪些患者将从该服务中受益,以及如何避免非计划性入住。一项对 MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Web of Science、Cochrane 数据库和灰色文献的系统评价确定了 44 项研究,评估了非心脏、非胸部和非神经外科手术成人人群中计划外入住重症监护病房的危险因素。由于研究设计的异质性,对入院标准进行比较、定量分析是不可行的。年龄、贫血、ASA 身体状况、体重指数、合并症负担、急诊手术、高风险手术、男性、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停、失血增加和手术时间都是计划外入住重症监护病房的独立危险因素。年龄、体重指数、合并症程度和急诊手术是在美国、英国、亚洲和澳大利亚确定的最常见的独立危险因素。这些危险因素可用于开发风险工具或决策树,以确定哪些患者可能受益于计划入住重症监护病房。未来的工作应包括测试这些措施的敏感性和特异性,无论是单独使用还是组合使用,以指导计划入住重症监护病房,减少患者恶化和非计划性入住。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验