Department of Anaesthesiology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Section for Surgical Pathophysiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anaesthesia. 2020 Jan;75 Suppl 1:e83-e89. doi: 10.1111/anae.14902.
Standardised peri-operative care pathways for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy or laparoscopy for non-traumatic pathologies have been shown to be inadequate and associated with high morbidity and mortality. Recent research has highlighted this problem and showed that simple pathways with 'rescue' interventions have been associated with reduced mortality when implemented successfully. These rescue pathways have focused on early diagnosis and surgery, specialist surgeon and anaesthetist involvement, goal-directed therapy and intensive or intermediary postoperative care for high-risk patients. In elective surgery, enhanced recovery has resulted in reduced length of stay and morbidity by the application of procedure-specific, evidence-based interventions inside rigorously implemented patient pathways based on multidisciplinary co-operation. The focus has been on attenuation of peri-operative stress and pain management to facilitate early recovery. Patients undergoing emergency laparotomy are a heterogeneous group consisting mostly of patients with intestinal perforations and/or obstruction with varying levels of comorbidity and frailty. However, present knowledge of the different pathophysiology and peri-operative trajectory of complications in these patient groups is limited. In order to move beyond rescue pathways and to establish enhanced recovery for emergency laparotomy, it is essential that research on both the peri-operative pathophysiology of the different main patient groups - intestinal obstruction and perforation - and the potentially differentiated impact of interventions is carried out. Procedure- and pathology-specific knowledge is lacking on key elements of peri-operative care, such as: multimodal analgesia; haemodynamic optimisation and fluid management; attenuation of surgical stress; nutritional optimisation; facilitation of mobilisation; and the optimal use and organisation of specialised wards and improved interdisciplinary collaboration. As such, the future challenges in improving peri-operative patient care in emergency laparotomy are moving from simple rescue pathways to establish research that can form a basis for morbidity- and procedure-specific enhanced recovery protocols as seen in elective surgery.
对于因非创伤性疾病而行急诊剖腹手术或腹腔镜手术的患者,标准化围手术期护理路径已被证明不够完善,且与高发病率和高死亡率相关。最近的研究强调了这一问题,并表明,当成功实施时,具有“救援”干预措施的简单路径与降低死亡率相关。这些救援路径侧重于早期诊断和手术、专科外科医生和麻醉师的参与、目标导向治疗以及高危患者的强化或中间术后护理。在择期手术中,通过在严格实施的多学科合作患者路径中应用特定于手术的、基于证据的干预措施,实现了快速康复,从而降低了住院时间和发病率。重点是减轻围手术期应激和疼痛管理,以促进早期恢复。行急诊剖腹手术的患者是一个异质群体,主要由患有肠穿孔和/或梗阻的患者组成,他们具有不同程度的合并症和脆弱性。然而,目前对这些患者群体的不同病理生理学和围手术期并发症轨迹的了解是有限的。为了超越救援路径并为急诊剖腹手术建立快速康复,必须对不同主要患者群体(肠梗阻和穿孔)的围手术期病理生理学以及干预措施的潜在差异影响进行研究。在围手术期护理的关键要素方面,缺乏针对手术和病理的知识,例如:多模式镇痛;血流动力学优化和液体管理;减轻手术应激;营养优化;促进活动;以及专门病房的最佳使用和组织以及改善跨学科合作。因此,改善急诊剖腹手术围手术期患者护理的未来挑战是从简单的救援路径转向建立可以作为在择期手术中看到的特定于发病率和特定于手术的快速康复方案的基础的研究。