Hospital de Pronto Socorro de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Oct;50(5):2123-2135. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02577-w. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
The implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery programs (ERPs) has significantly improved outcomes within various surgical specialties. However, the suitability of ERPs in trauma surgery remains unclear. This study aimed to (1) design and implement an ERP for trauma laparotomy patients; (2) assess its safety, feasibility, and efficacy; and (3) compare the outcomes of the proposed ERP with conventional practices.
This case-matched study prospectively enrolled hemodynamically stable patients undergoing emergency laparotomy after penetrating trauma. Patients receiving the proposed ERP were compared to historical controls who had received conventional treatment from two to eight years prior to protocol implementation. Cases were matched for age, sex, injury mechanism, extra-abdominal injuries, and trauma scores. Assessment of intervention effects were modelled using regression analysis for outcome measures, including length of hospital stay (LOS), postoperative complications, and functional recovery parameters.
Thirty-six consecutive patients were enrolled in the proposed ERP and matched to their 36 historical counterparts, totaling 72 participants. A statistically significant decrease in LOS, representing a 39% improvement in average LOS was observed. There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications. Opioid consumption was considerably lower in the ERP group (p < 0.010). Time to resumption of oral liquid and solid intake, as well as to the removal of nasogastric tubes, urinary catheters, and abdominal drains was significantly earlier among ERP patients (p < 0.001).
The implementation of a standardized ERP for the perioperative care of penetrating abdominal trauma patients yielded a significant reduction in LOS without increasing postoperative complications. These findings demonstrate that ERPs principles can be safely applied to selected trauma patients.
在多个外科专业中,实施术后加速康复(ERPs)方案显著改善了治疗结果。然而,ERPs 在创伤外科中的适用性尚不清楚。本研究旨在:(1)为创伤剖腹手术患者设计并实施 ERP;(2)评估其安全性、可行性和疗效;(3)比较所提出的 ERP 与常规实践的结果。
这项前瞻性病例匹配研究纳入了血流动力学稳定的穿透性创伤后行紧急剖腹手术的患者。接受所提出的 ERP 的患者与在方案实施前两到八年接受常规治疗的历史对照患者进行比较。通过回归分析对干预效果进行评估,以评估包括住院时间(LOS)、术后并发症和功能恢复参数在内的结果测量。
36 例连续患者被纳入拟议的 ERP 方案,并与他们的 36 例历史对照相匹配,总共 72 名参与者。观察到 LOS 显著降低,平均 LOS 改善了 39%。术后并发症的发生率没有差异。ERP 组的阿片类药物消耗量明显较低(p<0.010)。口服液体和固体摄入、拔除鼻胃管、导尿管和腹部引流管的时间在 ERP 患者中显著更早(p<0.001)。
为穿透性腹部创伤患者围手术期护理实施标准化的 ERP 可显著缩短 LOS,而不增加术后并发症。这些发现表明 ERPs 原则可安全应用于某些创伤患者。