Heart Failure Unit, St. Vincent University Hospital Health Care Group, Elm Park, Dublin, DO4 T6F4, Ireland.
University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Feb;7(1):158-166. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12547. Epub 2020 Jan 5.
In the PARADIGM-heart failure trial, sacubitril-valsartan demonstrated a reduction in heart failure admissions and reduced all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Although real world data have shown similar benefits regarding efficacy and safety, there has been difficulty in achieving the target dose (TD). The factors preventing the achievement of TD remains unclear. This study assesses the tolerability, ability to achieve, and factors linked to attaining TD in a routine clinical population.
This is a retrospective single-centre review of patients switched from angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers to sacubitril-valsartan between May 2016 and August 2018. Baseline and follow-up clinical characteristics and biomarker profiles were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to analyse predictors of achieving TD. Clinical response to sacubitril-valsartan was defined as a reduction in N terminal pro BNP of ≥30%, or an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥5% compared with baseline values. To date, a total of 322 patients (75% male patients) have been switched to sacubitril-valsartan. Those still in the titration phase were excluded (n = 25). Sacubitril-valsartan was not tolerated in 40 patients (12.4%). Those intolerant were older (73.4 years [68.3, 80.6] vs. 69.1 years [61.2, 76]; P = 0.003) and had worse renal function with estimated glomerular filtration rate (53.5 mL/min/1.72 m [36.8, 60.2] vs 60 mL/min/1.72 m [47, 77]; P ≤ 0.001). Of the remaining 257 patients, TD (97/103 mg BD) was achieved in 194 patients (75.5%), while 37 patients (11.4%) were maintained on 49/51 mg BD and 26 patients (8.1%) remained on 24/26 mg BD. Symptomatic hypotension (74.6%) was the main impediment to attaining TD, followed by renal deterioration (12.7%), and to a lesser extent hyperkalaemia and gastrointestinal symptoms (4.8% each). Diuretic dose decrease was achieved in 37.2% of patients, and this was the strongest independent predictor of achieving TD (odds ratio = 2.1; 95% confidence interval [1.16, 3.8]; P = 0.014). Responder status by N terminal pro BNP criterion was observed in 99 of 214 patients (46.3%) while 70 of 142 (49.3%) attained the left ventricular ejection fraction response status. Achieving this response was independently linked to achieving TD.
Sacubitril-valsartan was well tolerated. Achievement of TD was possible in the majority of the cohort and was linked to response metrics. Reduction in diuretic was required in a large percentage of the population and was the strongest predictor of attaining TD. Therefore, careful clinical attention to volume status assessment is essential to maximising the benefits of sacubitril-valsartan.
在 PARADIGM-心力衰竭试验中,沙库巴曲缬沙坦在射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者中降低了心力衰竭入院率和全因死亡率。尽管真实世界的数据显示在疗效和安全性方面具有相似的益处,但在达到目标剂量(TD)方面存在困难。阻止达到 TD 的因素尚不清楚。本研究评估了在常规临床人群中沙库巴曲缬沙坦的耐受性、实现能力以及与达到 TD 相关的因素。
这是一项回顾性单中心研究,研究对象为 2016 年 5 月至 2018 年 8 月期间从血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂转换为沙库巴曲缬沙坦的患者。收集了基线和随访的临床特征和生物标志物特征。采用单因素和多因素分析来分析达到 TD 的预测因素。沙库巴曲缬沙坦的临床反应定义为与基线相比,N 端脑钠肽前体降低≥30%,或左心室射血分数增加≥5%。迄今为止,共有 322 例(75%为男性)患者已转换为沙库巴曲缬沙坦。排除仍在滴定阶段的患者(n = 25)。沙库巴曲缬沙坦不耐受的患者有 40 例(12.4%)。不耐受者年龄较大(73.4 岁[68.3,80.6]比 69.1 岁[61.2,76];P = 0.003),估算肾小球滤过率(53.5 mL/min/1.72 m [36.8,60.2]比 60 mL/min/1.72 m [47,77];P ≤ 0.001)更差。在剩余的 257 例患者中,194 例(75.5%)达到了 TD(97/103 mg BD),37 例(11.4%)维持在 49/51 mg BD,26 例(8.1%)维持在 24/26 mg BD。达到 TD 的主要障碍是症状性低血压(74.6%),其次是肾功能恶化(12.7%),程度较轻的是高钾血症和胃肠道症状(各占 4.8%)。37.2%的患者减少了利尿剂剂量,这是达到 TD 的最强独立预测因素(比值比=2.1;95%置信区间[1.16,3.8];P = 0.014)。在 214 例患者中有 99 例(46.3%)通过 N 端脑钠肽标准观察到应答状态,而 142 例中有 70 例(49.3%)达到左心室射血分数应答状态。达到这一反应与达到 TD 独立相关。
沙库巴曲缬沙坦耐受性良好。在大多数队列中可以达到 TD,并且与反应指标相关。人群中需要减少利尿剂的使用,并且是达到 TD 的最强预测因素。因此,仔细评估临床容量状态至关重要,这对于最大限度地发挥沙库巴曲缬沙坦的益处非常重要。