Abdelbar Abdelrahman, Niranjan Gunaratnam, Tynnson Charlene, Saravanan Palanikumar, Knowles Andrew, Laskawski Grzegorz, Zacharias Joseph
171993 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lancashire Heart Centre, Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Manchester, UK.
171993 Department of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia, Lancashire Heart Centre, Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Innovations (Phila). 2020 Jan/Feb;15(1):66-73. doi: 10.1177/1556984519887946. Epub 2020 Jan 5.
Isolated tricuspid surgery through median sternotomy can be associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Reports of minimally invasive isolated tricuspid valve operations are rare, but the outcomes are encouraging. We present our experience of endoscopic isolated tricuspid valve surgery.
In our institution, 452 patients underwent endoscopic minimal access cardiac surgery between August 2008 and December 2018. A total of 90 patients underwent tricuspid valve surgery whether isolated or with other cardiac procedure. We further selected patients who had isolated tricuspid valve surgery ( = 24). Of these patients, 13 (54%) had more than one previous sternotomy.
Tricuspid repair was performed in 18 patients (75%) with the remaining 6 (25%) having bioprosthetic tricuspid replacement. Three (12.5%) were performed with a beating heart, the remaining with endoaortic clamping and cardioplegia. There were no conversions to sternotomy. None of the patients had reoperation for bleeding, tamponade, or valve issues. Three patients (12.5%) required blood transfusion, 3 patients (12.5%) required renal dialysis, and 7 patients (29%) had respiratory complications such as chest infection, requiring continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with 2 being re-intubated. One patient (4.1%) died within 30 days from chest sepsis leading to multi-organ failure. Mean hospital stay was 11.1 ± 8.9 days (median of 8). All patients had mild or less regurgitation on follow-up echo at 6 months.
Isolated tricuspid valve surgery can be performed through an endoscopic minimally access approach, with good results. It appears to provide better results than a sternotomy approach. A high repair rate can be achieved, and the procedure is particularly valuable in redo-surgery with low mortality and morbidity compared to historical sternotomy case series.
经正中胸骨切开术进行孤立性三尖瓣手术可能伴有较高的发病率和死亡率。微创孤立性三尖瓣手术的报道很少,但结果令人鼓舞。我们介绍我们在内镜下孤立性三尖瓣手术方面的经验。
在我们机构,2008年8月至2018年12月期间有452例患者接受了内镜下微创心脏手术。共有90例患者接受了三尖瓣手术,无论是孤立性手术还是与其他心脏手术同时进行。我们进一步选择了接受孤立性三尖瓣手术的患者(n = 24)。在这些患者中,13例(54%)曾接受过不止一次胸骨切开术。
18例患者(75%)进行了三尖瓣修复,其余6例(25%)进行了生物人工三尖瓣置换。3例(12.5%)在心脏跳动下进行手术,其余在主动脉内阻断和心脏停搏下进行。无一例转为胸骨切开术。所有患者均未因出血、心包填塞或瓣膜问题而再次手术。3例患者(12.5%)需要输血,3例患者(12.5%)需要肾透析,7例患者(29%)出现呼吸并发症,如胸部感染,需要持续气道正压通气(CPAP),其中2例再次插管。1例患者(4.1%)在30天内死于胸部脓毒症导致的多器官功能衰竭。平均住院时间为11.1±8.9天(中位数为8天)。所有患者在6个月的随访超声心动图检查中均有轻度或以下反流。
孤立性三尖瓣手术可通过内镜下微创方法进行,效果良好。它似乎比胸骨切开术方法提供更好的结果。可以实现较高的修复率,并且与既往胸骨切开术病例系列相比,该手术在再次手术中具有较低的死亡率和发病率,特别有价值。