• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

螺旋霉素与昆虫病原真菌和拟除虫菊酯混合物防治野豌豆上的 Sitona lineatus (鞘翅目: 象甲科)。

Spinosad and Mixtures of an Entomopathogenic Fungus and Pyrethrins for Control of Sitona lineatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Field Peas.

机构信息

Montana State University-Bozeman, Department of Research Centers, Western Triangle Agricultural Research Center, Conrad, MT.

Oregon State University, Hermiston Agricultural Research and Extension CenterHermiston, OR.

出版信息

J Econ Entomol. 2020 Apr 6;113(2):669-678. doi: 10.1093/jee/toz348.

DOI:10.1093/jee/toz348
PMID:31904082
Abstract

The pea leaf weevil, Sitona lineatus L., is an important pest of field peas and faba beans in most temperate regions. As no information is currently available on efficacy of biopesticides for S. lineatus control, laboratory bioassays were performed to evaluate the impact of biopesticides (spinosad, Beauveria bassiana strain GHA, pyrethrins, B. bassiana GHA + pyrethrins, and B. bassiana GHA + azadirachtin) against adults of this pest. The concentrations used in this bioassay were 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 times the lowest labeled application rate of each product. Results were further verified in cage experiments by assessing biopesticide effects on adult mortality and feeding damage in pea plants. The impact of biopesticides on mortality of larvae of two beneficial species, Chrysoperla carnea and Adalia bipunctata, was also tested in laboratory conditions. We found spinosad to be the most promising candidate, causing 100% adult mortality at high and medium concentrations. Beauveria bassiana and its combination with pyrethrins caused 60-62% adult mortality, but only at the highest concentration. In contrast, B. bassiana + azadirachtin and pyrethrins treatments caused only minimal adult mortality at all concentrations. In cage experiments, spinosad and B. bassiana + pyrethrins had significant effects on adult mortality and provided foliage protection from adult feeding. Conversely, the fungus treatment alone showed inconsistent performance. Beauveria bassiana and spinosad were generally harmless to C. carnea and A. bipunctata larvae, but B. bassiana + pyrethrins was toxic toward beneficial species. These results could help to improve integrated pest management programs intended to control S. lineatus.

摘要

豌豆叶甲, Sitona lineatus L.,是大多数温带地区田间豌豆和蚕豆的重要害虫。由于目前尚无关于生物农药防治 S. lineatus 的效果的信息,因此进行了实验室生物测定,以评估生物农药(多杀菌素、球孢白僵菌 GHA 菌株、除虫菊素、球孢白僵菌 GHA + 除虫菊素和球孢白僵菌 GHA + 印苦素)对该害虫成虫的影响。本生物测定中使用的浓度是每种产品最低标签施用量的 0.1、0.5、1.0 和 2.0 倍。结果在笼养实验中通过评估生物农药对豌豆植株上成虫死亡率和取食损伤的影响得到进一步验证。还在实验室条件下测试了生物农药对两种有益物种,Chrysoperla carnea 和 Adalia bipunctata 的幼虫死亡率的影响。我们发现多杀菌素是最有前途的候选者,在高浓度和中浓度下可导致 100%的成虫死亡率。球孢白僵菌及其与除虫菊素的组合可导致 60-62%的成虫死亡率,但仅在最高浓度下。相比之下,B. bassiana + azadirachtin 和除虫菊素处理在所有浓度下仅导致最低限度的成虫死亡率。在笼养实验中,多杀菌素和 B. bassiana + 除虫菊素对成虫死亡率有显著影响,并为叶片提供了免受成虫取食的保护。相反,单独使用真菌处理表现不一致。球孢白僵菌和多杀菌素对 C. carnea 和 A. bipunctata 幼虫一般无害,但 B. bassiana + 除虫菊素对有益物种有毒。这些结果有助于改善旨在控制 S. lineatus 的综合虫害管理计划。

相似文献

1
Spinosad and Mixtures of an Entomopathogenic Fungus and Pyrethrins for Control of Sitona lineatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Field Peas.螺旋霉素与昆虫病原真菌和拟除虫菊酯混合物防治野豌豆上的 Sitona lineatus (鞘翅目: 象甲科)。
J Econ Entomol. 2020 Apr 6;113(2):669-678. doi: 10.1093/jee/toz348.
2
Efficacy of Biopesticides for Management of the Swede Midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae).生物农药防治瑞典麦秆蝇(双翅目:瘿蚊科)的效果
J Econ Entomol. 2016 Oct;109(5):2159-67. doi: 10.1093/jee/tow192. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
3
Pea leaf weevil, Sitona lineatus (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), adult feeding preference and larval development on pulse crop varieties in Montana.豌豆象,Sitona lineatus(L.)(鞘翅目:象甲科),成虫对蒙大拿州豆类作物品种的取食偏好和幼虫发育。
Pest Manag Sci. 2024 Jun;80(6):2626-2638. doi: 10.1002/ps.7970. Epub 2024 Feb 11.
4
Laboratory and field efficacy of entomopathogenic fungi for the management of the sweetpotato weevil, Cylas formicarius (Coleoptera: Brentidae).昆虫病原真菌对甘薯小象甲(甘薯蚁象,鞘翅目:蛛甲科)防治的实验室及田间药效
J Invertebr Pathol. 2014 Oct;122:10-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Aug 9.
5
Management of Pea Leaf Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Development of a Nominal Threshold in Faba Beans.豌豆象(鞘翅目:象甲科)的管理及蚕豆上名义阈值的制定。
J Econ Entomol. 2021 Aug 5;114(4):1597-1606. doi: 10.1093/jee/toab086.
6
Synergistic Combinations of a Pyrethroid Insecticide and an Emulsifiable Oil Formulation of Beauveria bassiana to Overcome Insecticide Resistance in Listronotus maculicollis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).拟除虫菊酯类杀虫剂与球孢白僵菌乳油制剂的协同组合对克服黄斑背足象甲(鞘翅目:象甲科)的抗药性研究
J Econ Entomol. 2017 Aug 1;110(4):1794-1802. doi: 10.1093/jee/tox176.
7
Response of Pisum sativum (Fabales: Fabaceae) to Sitona lineatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) infestation: effect of adult weevil density on damage, larval population, and yield loss.豌豆(豆科:蝶形花科)对黑线沟象(鞘翅目:象甲科)侵害的反应:成虫象甲密度对损害、幼虫种群和产量损失的影响。
J Econ Entomol. 2011 Oct;104(5):1550-60. doi: 10.1603/ec10392.
8
Comparison of application methods for suppressing the pecan weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) with Beauveria bassiana under field conditions.田间条件下球孢白僵菌对核桃象甲(鞘翅目:象甲科)防治应用方法的比较
Environ Entomol. 2008 Feb;37(1):162-71. doi: 10.1603/0046-225x(2008)37[162:coamfs]2.0.co;2.
9
Effects of combining microbial and chemical insecticides on mortality of the Pecan Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).微生物杀虫剂和化学杀虫剂联合使用对美洲山核桃象(鞘翅目:象甲科)死亡率的影响。
J Econ Entomol. 2011 Feb;104(1):14-20. doi: 10.1603/ec10303.
10
Cumulative impact of a clover cover crop on the persistence and efficacy of Beauveria bassiana in suppressing the pecan weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).三叶草覆盖作物对球孢白僵菌抑制核桃象甲(鞘翅目:象甲科)的持效性和功效的累积影响。
Environ Entomol. 2012 Apr;41(2):298-307. doi: 10.1603/EN11229.

引用本文的文献

1
How Plants Synthesize Pyrethrins: Safe and Biodegradable Insecticides.植物如何合成除虫菊素:安全且可生物降解的杀虫剂。
Trends Plant Sci. 2020 Dec;25(12):1240-1251. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2020.06.012. Epub 2020 Jul 17.