Suppr超能文献

慢性非特异性颈痛女性的剪切波弹性成像测量颈肌僵硬度。

Neck Muscle Stiffness Measured With Shear Wave Elastography in Women With Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain.

出版信息

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Apr;50(4):179-188. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2020.8821. Epub 2020 Jan 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Utilizing shear wave elastography, we compared the stiffness of the neck extensor muscles and the stiffness in muscle-specific regions between women with chronic nonspecific neck pain and asymptomatic controls.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional observational study.

METHODS

We measured the average muscle stiffness over multiple neck extensor muscles and in regions corresponding approximately to the trapezius, splenius capitis, semispinalis capitis, semispinalis cervicis, and multifidus muscles using ultrasound shear wave elastography in 20 women with chronic nonspecific neck pain and 18 asymptomatic women during multiple tasks. The measurements were automatically quality controlled and computer processed over the complete visible neck region or a large muscle-specific region.

RESULTS

Pooled over all tasks, neck muscle stiffness was not significantly different between those with neck pain and asymptomatic controls (neck pain median, 11.6 kPa; interquartile range, 8.9 kPa and control median, 13.3 kPa; interquartile range, 8.6 kPa; = .175). The measure of neck muscle stiffness was not correlated with the intensity of neck pain or perceived disability.

CONCLUSION

Shear wave elastography revealed similar muscle stiffness in people with and without chronic neck pain, despite the sensation of increased neck stiffness in those with chronic neck pain. Therapeutic interventions aiming to reduce neck muscle tone are often based on the assumption that perceived neck stiffness corresponds to objective muscle stiffness. The current results question this assumption. .

摘要

目的

利用剪切波弹性成像技术,我们比较了慢性非特异性颈痛女性与无症状对照者颈部伸肌的僵硬程度和肌肉特定区域的僵硬程度。

设计

横断面观察性研究。

方法

我们使用超声剪切波弹性成像技术,在 20 名慢性非特异性颈痛女性和 18 名无症状女性在多个任务期间测量了多个颈部伸肌和大致对应斜方肌、头半棘肌、头最长肌、头夹肌和多裂肌的肌肉特定区域的平均肌肉僵硬程度。测量结果经过自动质量控制和计算机处理,覆盖完整可见颈部区域或较大的肌肉特定区域。

结果

在所有任务中,颈痛患者和无症状对照组的颈部肌肉僵硬程度没有显著差异(颈痛组中位数为 11.6kPa;四分位距为 8.9kPa,对照组中位数为 13.3kPa;四分位距为 8.6kPa;=0.175)。颈部肌肉僵硬程度的测量值与颈部疼痛的强度或感知残疾程度无关。

结论

尽管颈痛患者感觉颈部僵硬增加,但剪切波弹性成像显示颈痛患者和无症状对照者的肌肉僵硬程度相似。旨在降低颈部肌肉紧张度的治疗干预措施通常基于这样一种假设,即感知到的颈部僵硬程度对应于客观的肌肉僵硬程度。目前的结果对这一假设提出了质疑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验