Nosewicz Jacob, Cavallin Carla, Cheng Chin-I, Ragina Neli, Weiss Arno W, Zacharek Anthony
Central Michigan University College of Medicine, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858, United States.
Department of Statistics, Actuarial and Data Science, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858, United States.
World J Orthop. 2019 Dec 18;10(12):454-462. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i12.454.
Trigger digit is a common disorder of the hand associated with carpal tunnel syndrome. Carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgery may be a risk factor for trigger digit development; however, the association between surgical approach to CTR and postoperative trigger digit is equivocal.
To investigate patient risk factors for trigger digit development following either open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) or endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR).
This retrospective chart analysis evaluated 967 CTR procedures from 694 patients for the development of postoperative trigger digit. Patients were stratified according to the technique utilized for their CTR, either open or endoscopic. The development of postoperative trigger digit was evaluated at three time points: within 6 mo following CTR, between 6 mo and 12 mo following CTR, and after 12 mo following CTR. Firth's penalized likelihood logistic regression was conducted to evaluate sociodemographic and patient comorbidities as potential independent risk factors for trigger digit. Secondary regression models were conducted within each surgical group to reveal any potential interaction effects between surgical approach and patient risk factors for the development of postoperative trigger digit.
A total of 47 hands developed postoperative trigger digit following 967 CTR procedures (4.9%). In total, 64 digits experienced postoperative triggering. The long finger was most commonly affected. There was no significant difference between the open and endoscopic groups for trigger digit development at all three time points following CTR. Furthermore, there were no significant independent risk factors for postoperative trigger digit; however, within group analysis revealed a significant interaction effect between gender and surgical approach ( = 0.008). Females were more likely to develop postoperative trigger digit than males after OCTR(OR = 3.992), but were less likely to develop postoperative trigger digit than males after ECTR (OR = 0.489).
Patient comorbidities do not influence the development of trigger digit following CTR. Markedly, gender differences for postoperative trigger digit may depend on surgical approach to CTR.
扳机指是一种与腕管综合征相关的常见手部疾病。腕管松解术(CTR)手术可能是扳机指发生的一个危险因素;然而,CTR的手术方式与术后扳机指之间的关联并不明确。
研究开放性腕管松解术(OCTR)或内镜下腕管松解术(ECTR)后扳机指发生的患者危险因素。
这项回顾性图表分析评估了694例患者的967例CTR手术,以观察术后扳机指的发生情况。患者根据其CTR所采用的技术进行分层,即开放性或内镜下。在三个时间点评估术后扳机指的发生情况:CTR后6个月内、CTR后6个月至12个月之间以及CTR后12个月后。采用Firth惩罚似然逻辑回归来评估社会人口统计学和患者合并症作为扳机指潜在独立危险因素的情况。在每个手术组内进行二次回归模型分析,以揭示手术方式与患者危险因素之间对于术后扳机指发生的任何潜在交互作用。
在967例CTR手术后,共有47只手发生了术后扳机指(4.9%)。总共有64个手指出现术后扳机现象。示指最常受累。在CTR后的所有三个时间点,开放性组和内镜下组在扳机指发生方面没有显著差异。此外,术后扳机指没有显著的独立危险因素;然而,组内分析显示性别与手术方式之间存在显著的交互作用(P = 0.008)。OCTR后女性比男性更易发生术后扳机指(OR = 3.992),但ECTR后女性比男性发生术后扳机指的可能性更小(OR = 0.489)。
患者合并症不影响CTR后扳机指的发生。值得注意的是,术后扳机指的性别差异可能取决于CTR的手术方式。