Abdel Latif Ahmed, Nasreldin Mohamed, Abdel Kader Ann, Fathy Heba, Moussa Suaad, Basheer Mye, Elsheikh Adly, Madbouly Nagwan
J Psychiatr Pract. 2020 Jan;26(1):23-36. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000436.
Studies have compared electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with regard to their clinical efficacy in the treatment of depression, but only a few studies have addressed their differential impact on cognition. The purpose of this study was to compare the neurocognitive side effects of both treatment modalities.
In this comparative study, 40 patients with major depressive disorder referred for ECT were randomly assigned either to a course of 25 sessions of rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex or to a course of ECT ranging from 4 to 8 sessions. The primary outcome measures were the results of a cognitive battery that assessed different aspects of cognitive functioning. The cognitive battery comprised the Digit Span Subtest from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, the Stroop Color-Word Test-Victoria version, the Color Trails Test Trials 1 and 2, and the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test.
At the end of treatment, scores on the Digit Span Subtest, the Stroop Color-Word Test-Victoria version, and the Color Trails Test showed statistically significant better results in the rTMS group compared with the ECT group.
rTMS was well tolerated with less negative impact on cognitive functioning than ECT.
已有研究比较了电休克疗法(ECT)和重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)在治疗抑郁症方面的临床疗效,但仅有少数研究探讨了它们对认知功能的不同影响。本研究旨在比较这两种治疗方式的神经认知副作用。
在这项对比研究中,40名因ECT前来就诊的重度抑郁症患者被随机分配至两组,一组接受25次针对左侧背外侧前额叶皮质的rTMS治疗,另一组接受4至8次ECT治疗。主要结局指标是一套评估认知功能不同方面的认知测试组合的结果。该认知测试组合包括韦氏成人智力量表中的数字广度分测验、斯特鲁普颜色-文字测验-维多利亚版、颜色轨迹测验第1和第2项,以及雷-奥斯特里赫复杂图形测验。
治疗结束时,数字广度分测验、斯特鲁普颜色-文字测验-维多利亚版和颜色轨迹测验的得分显示,rTMS组与ECT组相比有统计学意义上的更好结果。
rTMS耐受性良好,对认知功能的负面影响小于ECT。