• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

更多的重复经颅磁刺激脉冲还是更多的疗程?对难治性抑郁症治疗结果的影响。

More rTMS pulses or more sessions? The impact on treatment outcome for treatment resistant depression.

作者信息

Oostra E, Jazdzyk P, Vis V, Dalhuisen I, Hoogendoorn A W, Planting C H M, van Eijndhoven P F, van der Werf Y D, van den Heuvel O A, van Exel E

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC, Dept. Psychiatry, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Amsterdam UMC, Dept Anatomy & Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2025 Apr;151(4):485-505. doi: 10.1111/acps.13768. Epub 2024 Nov 21.

DOI:10.1111/acps.13768
PMID:39569643
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11884915/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is effective for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Optimal rTMS parameters remain unclear, especially whether number of sessions or amount of pulses contribute more to treatment outcome. We hypothesize that treatment outcome depends on the number of sessions rather than on the amount of pulses.

METHODS

We searched databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on high-frequent (HF) or low-frequent (LF)-rTMS targeting the left or right DLPFC for TRD. Treatment efficacy was measured using standardized mean difference (SMD), calculated from pre- and post-treatment depression scores. Meta-regressions were used to explore linear associations between SMD and rTMS pulses, pulses/session and sessions for HF and LF-rTMS, separately for active and sham-rTMS. If these variables showed no linear association with SMD, we divided the data into quartiles and explored subgroup SMDs.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven RCTs were included: 67 studied HF-rTMS, eleven studied LF-rTMS, and nine studied both. No linear association was found between SMD and amount of pulses or pulses/session for HF and LF-rTMS. Subgroup analyses showed the largest SMDs for 1200-1500 HF-pulses/session and 360-450 LF-pulses/session. The number of sessions was significantly associated with SMD for active HF (β = 0.09, p < 0.05) and LF-rTMS (β = 0.06, p < 0.01). Thirty was the maximal number of sessions, in the included RCTs.

CONCLUSION

More rTMS sessions, but not more pulses, were associated with improved treatment outcome, in both HF and LF-rTMS. Our findings suggest that 1200-1500 HF-pulses/session and 360-450 LF-pulses/session are already sufficient, and that a treatment course should consist of least 30 sessions for higher chance of response.

摘要

背景

重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对难治性抑郁症(TRD)有效。最佳rTMS参数仍不明确,尤其是治疗疗程数或脉冲量对治疗效果的影响更大。我们假设治疗效果取决于治疗疗程数而非脉冲量。

方法

我们检索数据库,查找针对TRD采用高频(HF)或低频(LF)-rTMS刺激左侧或右侧背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)的随机临床试验(RCT)。使用标准化均数差(SMD)来衡量治疗效果,该指标根据治疗前后的抑郁评分计算得出。采用Meta回归分别探讨HF和LF-rTMS的SMD与rTMS脉冲量、每次脉冲量及治疗疗程数之间的线性关系,同时区分真实治疗组和假刺激组。如果这些变量与SMD无线性关系,我们将数据分为四分位数并探讨亚组的SMD。

结果

共纳入87项RCT:67项研究HF-rTMS,11项研究LF-rTMS,9项同时研究了两者。未发现HF和LF-rTMS的SMD与脉冲量或每次脉冲量之间存在线性关系。亚组分析显示,每次疗程1200 - 1500次HF脉冲和360 - 450次LF脉冲时SMD最大。治疗疗程数与真实治疗组的HF(β = 0.09,p < 0.05)和LF-rTMS(β = 0.06,p < 0.01)的SMD显著相关。在纳入的RCT中,治疗疗程数最多为30次。

结论

在HF和LF-rTMS中,更多的rTMS治疗疗程而非更多的脉冲量与更好的治疗效果相关。我们的研究结果表明,每次疗程1200 - 1500次HF脉冲和360 - 450次LF脉冲已足够,并且一个治疗疗程至少应包括30次,以提高反应几率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc7/11884915/078c980d7fb5/ACPS-151-485-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc7/11884915/05659ac53ab6/ACPS-151-485-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc7/11884915/97b9ea0cae11/ACPS-151-485-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc7/11884915/3537b60906f0/ACPS-151-485-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc7/11884915/5577ae8755f7/ACPS-151-485-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc7/11884915/078c980d7fb5/ACPS-151-485-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc7/11884915/05659ac53ab6/ACPS-151-485-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc7/11884915/97b9ea0cae11/ACPS-151-485-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc7/11884915/3537b60906f0/ACPS-151-485-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc7/11884915/5577ae8755f7/ACPS-151-485-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc7/11884915/078c980d7fb5/ACPS-151-485-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
More rTMS pulses or more sessions? The impact on treatment outcome for treatment resistant depression.更多的重复经颅磁刺激脉冲还是更多的疗程?对难治性抑郁症治疗结果的影响。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2025 Apr;151(4):485-505. doi: 10.1111/acps.13768. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
2
Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.用于慢性疼痛的非侵入性脑刺激技术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 16;3(3):CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub4.
3
Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.用于慢性疼痛的非侵入性脑刺激技术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 13;4(4):CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub5.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
6
Clinically meaningful efficacy and acceptability of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating primary major depression: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials.低频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗原发性重度抑郁症的临床有效性和可接受性:随机、双盲、假刺激对照试验的荟萃分析。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013 Mar;38(4):543-51. doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.237. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
7
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
8
Comparative Effectiveness of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain, Fatigue, and Sleep Quality in Fibromyalgia. A Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis.非侵入性脑刺激治疗纤维肌痛疼痛、疲劳和睡眠质量的比较效果:一项网状Meta分析的系统评价
Clin J Pain. 2025 May 1;41(5):e1282. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001282.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
10
Effectiveness and safety of different electromagnetic stimulation therapies in treating post-stroke insomnia: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.不同电磁刺激疗法治疗脑卒中后失眠的有效性和安全性:一项随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 3;20(7):e0327544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327544. eCollection 2025.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of a novel three-day repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy in dogs: single-blinded randomised sham-controlled clinical trial.一种新型三日重复经颅磁刺激方案治疗犬耐药性癫痫的应用:单盲随机假对照临床试验。
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Aug 6;12:1598311. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1598311. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative efficacy of different modalities of transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating Parkinson's disease with depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.不同形式经颅磁刺激治疗帕金森病伴发抑郁的疗效比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 31;16:1627932. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1627932. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Targeting Method for rTMS for Treating Depression in Japanese Patients: A Comparison of the Standard, F3, and Neuronavigation Approaches.针对日本患者的 rTMS 治疗抑郁症的靶向方法:标准、F3 和神经导航方法的比较。
Neuropsychobiology. 2024;83(3-4):170-178. doi: 10.1159/000541006. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
2
rTMS as a Next Step in Antidepressant Nonresponders: A Randomized Comparison With Current Antidepressant Treatment Approaches.rTMS 作为抗抑郁药无反应者的下一步治疗:与当前抗抑郁药治疗方法的随机比较。
Am J Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 1;181(9):806-814. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.20230556. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
3
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Across Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis.
Sawtooth Magnetic Fields: An Innovative Approach to Magnetic Stimulation in Biomedical Sciences.
锯齿形磁场:生物医学科学中磁刺激的一种创新方法。
Bioelectricity. 2025 Jun 9;7(2):134-138. doi: 10.1089/bioe.2025.0021. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Non-invasive therapeutics for neurotrauma: a mechanistic overview.神经创伤的非侵入性治疗:机制概述。
Front Neurol. 2025 May 14;16:1560777. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1560777. eCollection 2025.
经颅磁刺激和经颅直流电刺激治疗精神障碍:系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2412616. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12616.
4
When to hold and when to fold: Early prediction of nonresponse to transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depressive disorder.何时坚持,何时放弃:早期预测重度抑郁症患者对经颅磁刺激治疗的无反应性。
Brain Stimul. 2024 Mar-Apr;17(2):272-282. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.02.019. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
5
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Neuroplasticity and the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders: State of the Evidence and Future Opportunities.重复经颅磁刺激诱导的神经可塑性与精神障碍的治疗:证据现状与未来机遇。
Biol Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 15;95(6):592-600. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.11.016. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
6
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) triggers dose-dependent homeostatic rewiring in recurrent neuronal networks.重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)在反复发作的神经元网络中引发剂量依赖性的同型重塑。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Nov 13;19(11):e1011027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011027. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
Dosing transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depressive disorder: Relations between number of treatment sessions and effectiveness in a large patient registry.重度抑郁症经颅磁刺激治疗的剂量:大型患者登记数据库中治疗疗程数量与疗效的关系
Brain Stimul. 2023 Sep-Oct;16(5):1510-1521. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.10.001. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
8
The effect of deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with an H1 coil on hopelessness in patients with major depressive disorder: A randomized controlled trial.H1 线圈重复经颅深部磁刺激对重性抑郁障碍患者绝望感的影响:一项随机对照试验。
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2024 Jan-Feb;25(1):16-25. doi: 10.1080/15622975.2023.2251055. Epub 2024 Jan 7.
9
A randomized trial comparing beam F3 and 5.5 cm targeting in rTMS treatment of depression demonstrates similar effectiveness.一项比较 rTMS 治疗抑郁症时束 F3 与 5.5cm 靶点的随机试验显示出相似的疗效。
Brain Stimul. 2023 Sep-Oct;16(5):1392-1400. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.09.006. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
10
Regulatory Clearance and Approval of Therapeutic Protocols of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Psychiatric Disorders.经颅磁刺激治疗精神疾病方案的监管许可与批准
Brain Sci. 2023 Jul 5;13(7):1029. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13071029.