Federico Alessandro, Caprio Giuseppe Gerardo, Dalise Anna Maria, Barbieri Michelangela, Dallio Marcello, Loguercio Carmelina, Paolisso Giuseppe, Rizzo Maria Rosaria
Department of Precision Medicine.
Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences - University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli Naples, Italy.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(2):e18501. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018501.
The frailty represents a key determinant of elderly clinical assessment, especially because it allows the identification of risk factors potentially modifiable by clinical and therapeutic interventions. The frailty assessment in elderly patients usually is made by using of Fried criteria. However, to assess the frailty in cirrhotic patients, multiple but different tools are used by researchers. Thus, we aimed to compare frailty prevalence in elderly patients with well-compensated liver cirrhosis and without cirrhosis, according to Fried criteria.Among 205 elderly patients screened, a total of 148 patients were enrolled. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence/absence of well-compensated liver cirrhosis.After clinical examination with conventional scores of cirrhosis, all patients underwent anthropometric measurements, nutritional, biochemical, comorbidity, and cognitive performances. Frailty assessment was evaluated according to Fried frailty criteria.Unexpectedly, according to the Fried criteria, non-cirrhotic patients were frailer (14.2%) than well-compensated liver cirrhotic patients (7.5%). The most represented Fried criterion was the unintentional weight loss in non-cirrhotic patients (10.1%) compared to well-compensated liver cirrhotic patients (1.4%). Moreover, cumulative illness rating scale -G severity score was significantly and positively associated with frailty status (r = 0.234, P < .004). In a multivariate linear regression model, only female gender, body mass index and mini nutritional assessment resulted associated with frailty status, independently of other confounding variables.Despite the fact that elderly cirrhotic patients are considered to be frailer than the non-cirrhotic elderly patient, relying solely on "mere visual appearance," our data show that paradoxically non-cirrhotic elderly patients are frailer than elderly well-compensated liver cirrhotic patients. Thus, clinical implication of this finding is that frailty assessment performed in the well-compensated liver cirrhotic patient can identify those cirrhotic patients who may benefit from tailored interventions similarly to non-cirrhotic elderly patients.
衰弱是老年临床评估的关键决定因素,特别是因为它有助于识别可能通过临床和治疗干预加以改变的风险因素。老年患者的衰弱评估通常采用弗里德标准。然而,对于肝硬化患者的衰弱评估,研究人员使用了多种不同的工具。因此,我们旨在根据弗里德标准比较代偿良好的肝硬化老年患者和非肝硬化老年患者的衰弱患病率。
在筛查的205例老年患者中,共有148例患者入组。根据是否存在代偿良好的肝硬化,将患者分为两组。
在采用传统肝硬化评分进行临床检查后,所有患者均接受了人体测量、营养、生化、合并症及认知功能评估。根据弗里德衰弱标准进行衰弱评估。
出乎意料的是,根据弗里德标准,非肝硬化患者(14.2%)比代偿良好的肝硬化患者(7.5%)更衰弱。弗里德标准中表现最突出的是,非肝硬化患者(10.1%)的非故意体重减轻情况高于代偿良好的肝硬化患者(1.4%)。此外,累积疾病评定量表-G严重程度评分与衰弱状态显著正相关(r = 0.234,P < 0.004)。在多变量线性回归模型中,仅女性性别、体重指数和微型营养评定与衰弱状态相关,独立于其他混杂变量。
尽管老年肝硬化患者被认为比非肝硬化老年患者更衰弱,但仅靠“单纯的外观”判断,我们的数据显示,矛盾的是,非肝硬化老年患者比代偿良好的肝硬化老年患者更衰弱。因此,这一发现的临床意义在于,对代偿良好的肝硬化患者进行衰弱评估可以识别出那些可能与非肝硬化老年患者一样从针对性干预中获益的肝硬化患者。