Department of Dietetics and Nutrition, Maxima MC, De Run 4600, 5504 DB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Department of Internal Medicine, Maxima MC, De Run 4600, 5504 DB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Sep;28(9):4381-4393. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05251-9. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
Differences in body weight changes and serum liver tests (LTs) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) versus no PN during remission induction (RI) treatment were assessed.
Retrospectively, differences in body weight changes and serum LTs in AML patients (n = 213) who received PN versus no PN during RI treatment in one of three Dutch hospitals between 2004 and 2015 were assessed. Weekly body weight and serum LT registrations were collected from medical records. Patients' body weight changes were compared between the hospitals where PN is applied upon first indication of inadequate oral intake (PN hospitals) and the hospital where use of PN is limited to severe cases only (no-PN hospital) using repeated measures mixed model analysis. Differences in severity of serum LT elevations, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0, were assessed between patients who did and did not receive PN using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, and multiple logistic regression analysis.
Compared with patients of the PN hospitals, patients of the no-PN hospital experienced significantly more body weight loss during RI treatment (between-group difference 7.2%, 95% CI 4.0-10.3%). Furthermore, PN was associated with transient mild to moderate elevations of liver enzymes, but not with raised median total bilirubin levels nor with occurrence of CTCAE grade 3-4 LT elevations.
Frequent compared with exceptional use of PN in AML patients during RI treatment better preserved body weight, without clinically relevant (CTCAE grade 3-4) elevations in serum LTs.
评估在缓解诱导(RI)治疗期间接受与不接受肠外营养(PN)的急性髓系白血病(AML)患者的体重变化和血清肝试验(LTs)的差异。
回顾性评估了 2004 年至 2015 年期间荷兰的三家医院中,在 RI 治疗期间接受 PN 与不接受 PN 的 AML 患者(n=213)的体重变化和血清 LT 的差异。从病历中收集每周体重和血清 LT 记录。使用重复测量混合模型分析比较了在首次出现口服摄入不足时即应用 PN(PN 医院)和仅在严重情况下使用 PN(无 PN 医院)的两家医院的患者体重变化。使用卡方或 Fisher 精确检验和多因素逻辑回归分析评估了根据通用不良事件术语标准(CTCAE)4.0 发生和未发生 PN 的患者中血清 LT 升高严重程度的差异。
与 PN 医院的患者相比,无 PN 医院的患者在 RI 治疗期间体重下降更为明显(组间差异 7.2%,95%CI 4.0-10.3%)。此外,PN 与肝酶的短暂轻度至中度升高相关,但与中位总胆红素水平升高或 CTCAE 3-4 级 LT 升高无关。
与 RI 治疗期间 AML 患者偶尔使用 PN 相比,频繁使用 PN 可更好地维持体重,且不会导致血清 LTs 出现有临床意义的(CTCAE 3-4 级)升高。