Fiedorowicz Jess G, Cyranowski Jill M, Liu Zhuangzhuang, Swartz Holly A
University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.
Chatham University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Neurol Psychiatry Brain Res. 2019 Sep;33:112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.npbr.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Aug 10.
Limited prospective data, mostly focused on bipolar I disorder, suggests that pro-inflammatory cytokines are elevated in abnormal mood states. We evaluated whether treatment normalizes peripheral markers of inflammation in bipolar II disorder.
Using data from a randomized clinical trial of Interpersonal and Social Rhythm Therapy (IPSRT) + quetiapine vs. IPSRT + placebo for bipolar II depression, we examined whether these treatments for bipolar II depression impact inflammatory cytokines and whether observed changes in cytokines are associated with changes in depressive symptomatology as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17).
Cytokine values were available for 33 participants who completed baseline and 20-week followup visits. After excluding those with CRP values >=10 mg/L, there were 27 patients available for analysis (IPSRT+quetiapine N=10, IPSRT+placebo N=17). Baseline measure of inflammation did not appear to moderate treatment response, nor was change in HRSD-17 score correlated with changes in cytokines. Those who received IPSRT+quetiapine had significantly greater increases in IL-6 (=0.02) and TNF-α (=0.04), even after adjusting for changes in body mass index, than the IPSRT alone group. Descriptively, the quetiapine group showed increases in pro-inflammatory and decreases in anti-inflammatory cytokines and the psychotherapy group showed reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines.
Despite both groups showing depression improvement, this small study suggests a more pro-inflammatory cytokine profile over time with quetiapine plus psychotherapy compared to psychotherapy alone. Elevated risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among those with bipolar II disorder underscores the importance of delivering treatments that do not exacerbate these risk factors.
有限的前瞻性数据大多聚焦于双相 I 型障碍,提示促炎细胞因子在异常情绪状态下升高。我们评估了治疗是否能使双相 II 型障碍患者外周炎症标志物恢复正常。
利用一项人际与社会节律疗法(IPSRT)+喹硫平与 IPSRT+安慰剂治疗双相 II 型抑郁的随机临床试验数据,我们研究了这些双相 II 型抑郁治疗方法是否会影响炎性细胞因子,以及观察到的细胞因子变化是否与汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HRSD-17)测量的抑郁症状变化相关。
33 名完成基线和 20 周随访的参与者有细胞因子值。排除 CRP 值≥10 mg/L 的参与者后,有 27 名患者可供分析(IPSRT+喹硫平组 N = 10,IPSRT+安慰剂组 N = 17)。炎症的基线测量似乎并未调节治疗反应,HRSD-17 评分的变化也与细胞因子变化无关。接受 IPSRT+喹硫平治疗的患者,即使在调整体重指数变化后,IL-6(=0.02)和 TNF-α(=0.04)的升高也显著高于单纯 IPSRT 组。描述性地说,喹硫平组促炎细胞因子增加,抗炎细胞因子减少,心理治疗组促炎细胞因子减少。
尽管两组抑郁症状均有改善,但这项小型研究表明,与单纯心理治疗相比,喹硫平联合心理治疗随时间推移会出现更明显的促炎细胞因子谱。双相 II 型障碍患者心血管发病和死亡风险升高,凸显了提供不会加重这些风险因素的治疗方法的重要性。