• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过使用被动远程监测连接社区客户与家庭成员/朋友照顾者实现远近兼顾的关怀:一项实用随机对照试验方案

Caring Near and Far by Connecting Community-Based Clients and Family Member/Friend Caregivers Using Passive Remote Monitoring: Protocol for a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Donelle Lorie, Regan Sandra, Kerr Michael, Zwarenstein Merrick, Bauer Michael, Warner Grace, Isaranuwatchai Wanrudee, Zecevic Aleksandra, Borycki Elizabeth, Forbes Dorothy, Weeks Lori, Leipert Bev, Read Emily

机构信息

Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Department of Family Medicine, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jan 10;9(1):e15027. doi: 10.2196/15027.

DOI:10.2196/15027
PMID:31922492
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6996726/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Significant chronic disease challenges exist among older adults. However, most older adults want to remain at home even if their health conditions challenge their ability to live independently. Yet publicly funded home care resources are scarce, private home care is expensive, and family/friend caregivers have limited capacity. Many older adults with chronic illness would require institutional care without the support from family member/friend caregivers. This role raises the risk of physical health problems, stress, burnout, and depression. Passive remote monitoring (RM), the use of sensors that do not require any action by the individual for the system to work, may increase the older adult's ability to live independently while also providing support and peace of mind to both the client and the family member/friend caregiver.

OBJECTIVE

This paper presents the protocol of a study conducted in two provinces in Canada to investigate the impact of RM along with usual home care (the intervention) versus usual home care alone (control) on older adults with complex care. The primary outcome for this study is the occurrence of and time to events such as trips to emergency, short-term admission to the hospital, terminal admission to the hospital awaiting admission to long-term care, and direct admission to long-term care. The secondary outcomes for this study are (1) health care costs, (2) client functional status and quality of life in the home, (3) family/friend caregiver stress, and (4) family/friend caregiver functional health status.

METHODS

The design for this study is an unblinded pragmatic randomized controlled trial (PRCT) with two parallel arms in two geographic strata (Ontario and Nova Scotia). Quantitative and qualitative methodologies will be used to address the study objectives. This PRCT is conceptually informed by the principles of client-centered care and viewing the family as the client and aims at providing supported self-management.

RESULTS

This study is supported by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research. A primary completion date is anticipated in fall 2022.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this real-world rigorous randomized trial will support Canadian decision-makers, providers, and clients and their caregivers in assessing the health, well-being, and economic benefits and the social and technological challenges of integrating RM technologies to support older adults to stay in their home, including evaluating the impact on the burden of care experienced by family/friend caregivers. With an aging population, this technology may reduce institutionalization and promote safe and independent living for the elderly as long as possible.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 79884651; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN79884651.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/15027.

摘要

背景

老年人面临着重大的慢性病挑战。然而,大多数老年人即使健康状况对其独立生活能力构成挑战,仍希望居家养老。然而,公共资助的家庭护理资源稀缺,私人家庭护理费用昂贵,家庭/朋友护理人员的能力也有限。许多患有慢性病的老年人如果没有家庭成员/朋友护理人员的支持,将需要机构护理。这增加了身体健康问题、压力、倦怠和抑郁的风险。被动远程监测(RM),即使用无需个人采取任何行动即可运行的传感器,可能会提高老年人的独立生活能力,同时也为客户及其家庭成员/朋友护理人员提供支持并使其安心。

目的

本文介绍了在加拿大两个省份进行的一项研究方案,该研究旨在调查远程监测与常规家庭护理(干预措施)相比,单纯常规家庭护理(对照)对需要复杂护理的老年人的影响。本研究的主要结局是诸如前往急诊、短期住院、等待入住长期护理机构的末期住院以及直接入住长期护理机构等事件的发生情况和时间。本研究的次要结局包括:(1)医疗保健费用;(2)客户在家中的功能状态和生活质量;(3)家庭/朋友护理人员的压力;(4)家庭/朋友护理人员的功能健康状况。

方法

本研究采用非盲实用随机对照试验(PRCT)设计,在两个地理区域(安大略省和新斯科舍省)设置两个平行组。将使用定量和定性方法来实现研究目标。该PRCT在概念上以以客户为中心的护理原则为指导,并将家庭视为客户,旨在提供支持性自我管理。

结果

本研究得到了加拿大卫生研究院的支持。预计主要完成日期为2022年秋季。

结论

这项严格的现实世界随机试验的结果将有助于加拿大的决策者、提供者、客户及其护理人员评估健康、福祉、经济效益以及整合远程监测技术以支持老年人居家养老所面临的社会和技术挑战,包括评估对家庭/朋友护理人员护理负担的影响。随着人口老龄化,这项技术可能会减少机构化,并尽可能促进老年人的安全和独立生活。

试验注册

国际标准随机对照试验编号(ISRCTN)79884651;http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN79884651。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/15027。

相似文献

1
Caring Near and Far by Connecting Community-Based Clients and Family Member/Friend Caregivers Using Passive Remote Monitoring: Protocol for a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.通过使用被动远程监测连接社区客户与家庭成员/朋友照顾者实现远近兼顾的关怀:一项实用随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jan 10;9(1):e15027. doi: 10.2196/15027.
2
Caregiver- and patient-directed interventions for dementia: an evidence-based analysis.针对痴呆症的照护者及患者导向干预措施:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(4):1-98. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
3
Stakeholder Perspectives on In-home Passive Remote Monitoring to Support Aging in Place in the Province of New Brunswick, Canada: Rapid Qualitative Investigation.利益相关者对加拿大新不伦瑞克省支持就地养老的居家被动远程监测的看法:快速定性调查
JMIR Aging. 2022 May 11;5(2):e31486. doi: 10.2196/31486.
4
The ACHRU-CPP versus usual care for older adults with type-2 diabetes and multiple chronic conditions and their family caregivers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.ACHRU-CPP与2型糖尿病及多种慢性病老年患者及其家庭照护者的常规护理对比:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Feb 6;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1795-9.
5
Health service experiences and preferences of frail home care clients and their family and friend caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,体弱多病的家庭护理客户及其家人和朋友护理者的健康服务体验和偏好。
BMC Res Notes. 2021 Jul 14;14(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05686-6.
6
Community-Integrated Intermediary Care (CIIC) Service Model to Enhance Family-Based, Long-Term Care for Older People: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in Thailand.社区综合中介护理(CIIC)服务模式以加强基于家庭的老年人长期护理:泰国一项整群随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Mar 24;10(3):e20196. doi: 10.2196/20196.
7
The Smarter Safer Homes Solution to Support Older People Living in Their Own Homes Through Enhanced Care Models: Protocol for a Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial.通过强化护理模式支持老年人居家生活的更智能、更安全的家庭解决方案:一项分层随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jan 24;11(1):e31970. doi: 10.2196/31970.
8
The TECH@HOME study, a technological intervention to reduce caregiver burden for informal caregivers of people with dementia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.TECH@HOME研究:一项减轻痴呆症患者非正式照料者负担的技术干预措施——一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Feb 9;18(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1796-8.
9
Program of Intensive Support in Emergency Departments for Care Partners of Cognitively Impaired Patients: Protocol for a Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial.急诊科对认知障碍患者护理伙伴的强化支持项目:一项多中心随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Oct 20;11(10):e36607. doi: 10.2196/36607.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Passive Remote Monitoring Technologies' Influence on Home Care Clients' Ability to Stay Home: Multiprovincial Randomized Controlled Trial.被动远程监测技术对居家护理客户居家能力的影响:多省随机对照试验
JMIR Aging. 2025 Mar 19;8:e69107. doi: 10.2196/69107.
2
Community-based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people, stratified by frailty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.基于社区的复杂干预措施,针对体弱老年人维持其独立性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(48):1-194. doi: 10.3310/HNRP2514.
3
Stakeholder Perspectives on In-home Passive Remote Monitoring to Support Aging in Place in the Province of New Brunswick, Canada: Rapid Qualitative Investigation.利益相关者对加拿大新不伦瑞克省支持就地养老的居家被动远程监测的看法:快速定性调查
JMIR Aging. 2022 May 11;5(2):e31486. doi: 10.2196/31486.
4
Health service experiences and preferences of frail home care clients and their family and friend caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,体弱多病的家庭护理客户及其家人和朋友护理者的健康服务体验和偏好。
BMC Res Notes. 2021 Jul 14;14(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05686-6.

本文引用的文献

1
The Financial Impact Scale.财务影响量表。
J Gerontol Soc Work. 1992 Jun;18(1-2):135-150. doi: 10.1300/J083V18N03_10.
2
The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose.PRECIS-2工具:设计符合目的的试验。
BMJ. 2015 May 8;350:h2147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2147.
3
Caring for caregivers: facing up to tough challenges.关爱照顾者:直面严峻挑战。
Healthc Q. 2014;17(3):20-3. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2014.24015.
4
Patient and community engagement: the approach at university health network.患者与社区参与:大学健康网络的方法
Healthc Q. 2014;17(3):70-3. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2014.24023.
5
The safety at home study: an evidence base for policy and practice change.家庭安全研究:政策与实践变革的证据基础。
Healthc Q. 2014;17(3):42-7. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2014.24019.
6
Caregiving is not a disease: moving from reactive to proactive supports for family caregivers across the healthcare system.护理并非一种疾病:推动整个医疗保健系统从被动反应转向为家庭护理人员提供主动支持。
Healthc Q. 2014;17(3):36-41. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2014.24018.
7
Caring for caregivers of high-needs older persons.关爱高需求老年人的照料者。
Healthc Q. 2014;17(3):24-9. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2014.24016.
8
How to do random allocation (randomization).如何进行随机分配(随机化)。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2014 Mar;6(1):103-9. doi: 10.4055/cios.2014.6.1.103. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
9
Observations of daily living: putting the "personal" in personal health records.日常生活观察:将“个人”融入个人健康记录。
NI 2012 (2012). 2012 Jun 23;2012:6. eCollection 2012.
10
Seniors' use of and unmet needs for home care, 2009.2009 年老年人对家庭护理的使用情况和未满足的需求。
Health Rep. 2012 Dec;23(4):55-60.