Suppr超能文献

采用多学科联合的方法,可以实现微创、保留神经的腹膜后外周神经鞘瘤切除术。

Interdisciplinary approach allows minimally invasive, nerve-sparing removal of retroperitoneal peripheral nerve sheath tumors.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Mar;405(2):199-205. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01851-5. Epub 2020 Jan 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

En bloc resection of retroperitoneal peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNST) is advocated by a variety of surgical disciplines. Yet, microsurgical, nerve-sparing tumor resection might be better suited to improve symptoms and maintain neurological function, especially in cases where patients present with preoperative neurological deficits. However, neurosurgeons, versed in nerve-sparing techniques to remove PNST, are generally unfamiliar with the visceral approaches to retroperitoneal PNST.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluate a series of 16 patients suffering from retroperitoneal PNST. Patients were treated by a unique interdisciplinary approach, combining the visceral surgeon's skills to navigate the complex anatomy of the retroperitoneal space and the neurosurgeon's familiarity with microsurgical, nerve-sparing tumor removal. Specifically, we assess whether our interdisciplinary approach is suited to improve preoperative symptoms and maintain neurological function and study whether oncological outcome, surgical morbidity, and operative times are comparable to those reported for "classical" retroperitoneal PNST resection. In addition, we study two cases of suspected PNST that were diagnosed as malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) after surgery.

RESULTS

Total macroscopic tumor resection was achieved in 14/16 PNST patients. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 680.6 ml (95% CI, 194.3-1167.0 ml) and mean operative time was 162.5 min (95% CI, 121.6-203.4 min). We did not record any major postoperative surgical or neurological complications. A total of 8/11 patients with preoperative pain symptoms reported long-lasting improvement of their symptoms. In terms of oncological outcome, all patients that had been subjected to total tumor removal and for whom follow-up was available, were tumor-free after a mean follow-up of 761.9 days (95% CI, 97.6-1426.0 days). One of the two MPNST patients, who presented with tumor progress 15 months after initial surgery, was subjected to radical re-resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Interdisciplinary, nerve-sparing removal of retroperitoneal PNST is well suited to improve preoperative symptoms and maintain neurological function, while achieving an oncological outcome and a surgical morbidity similar to previously reported results for radical retroperitoneal PNST resection. Radical re-resection was feasible in a patient with post hoc MPNST diagnosis.

摘要

目的

各种外科专业都提倡整块切除腹膜后外周神经鞘瘤(PNST)。然而,保留神经的显微外科肿瘤切除术可能更适合改善症状并维持神经功能,尤其是在患者术前存在神经功能缺损的情况下。然而,擅长保留神经技术切除 PNST 的神经外科医生通常不熟悉腹膜后 PNST 的内脏入路。

方法

我们回顾性评估了 16 例腹膜后 PNST 患者。患者采用独特的多学科方法治疗,结合内脏外科医生对腹膜后复杂解剖结构的了解和神经外科医生对保留神经的显微外科肿瘤切除的熟悉。具体来说,我们评估我们的多学科方法是否适合改善术前症状和维持神经功能,并研究肿瘤学结果、手术发病率和手术时间是否与“经典”腹膜后 PNST 切除报道的结果相当。此外,我们研究了两例术后诊断为恶性外周神经鞘瘤(MPNST)的疑似 PNST 病例。

结果

16 例 PNST 患者中,14 例实现了肿瘤的全切除。术中平均失血量为 680.6ml(95%CI,194.3-1167.0ml),平均手术时间为 162.5min(95%CI,121.6-203.4min)。我们没有记录任何重大术后手术或神经并发症。11 例术前有疼痛症状的患者中,共有 8 例报告疼痛症状长期缓解。在肿瘤学结果方面,所有接受全肿瘤切除且有随访资料的患者,在平均随访 761.9 天(95%CI,97.6-1426.0 天)后无肿瘤复发。两名 MPNST 患者之一,在初次手术后 15 个月出现肿瘤进展,接受了根治性再切除。

结论

保留神经的腹膜后 PNST 多学科切除术非常适合改善术前症状和维持神经功能,同时实现与先前报道的根治性腹膜后 PNST 切除相似的肿瘤学结果和手术发病率。在一名 MPNST 患者中,可行根治性再切除。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a97a/7239799/1a8d1973de96/423_2019_1851_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验