Suppr超能文献

应用静脉移植桥接修复伴有节段性血管缺损的指尖离断伤的成活率和失败风险因素。

Survival rates and risk factors for failure using an interposition vein graft for fingertip amputations with segmental vessel defects.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, U and J Hospital, Gimpo, South Korea.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Microsurgery. 2020 May;40(4):447-451. doi: 10.1002/micr.30554. Epub 2020 Jan 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare survival rates and risk factors of replantation failures using an interposition vein graft in fingertip amputations with segmental vessel defects with those using simple end-to-end anastomosis in amputations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2004 and 2015, 776 (647 males and 129 females) with single Zone I or II amputations of digits underwent replantation. Among these, simple end-to-end anastomosis was performed in 698 replantations, while interposition vein grafts were used for either arterial or venous repair or both in 78 amputated fingertips. The survival rate was compared between the groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors predicting replantation failure in all study subjects.

RESULTS

Among 776 replantations, 713 (91.9%) survived. At latest follow-up, of 698 cases in the simple anastomosis group, 650 (93.1%) survived; of 78 cases in the vein graft group, 63 (80.8%) survived (p > .001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that avulsion type (odds ratio [OR] 3.121; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.211-8.064; p = .018) and zone II amputation (OR, 2.370; 95% CI, 1.382-4.065; p = .002) were significant risk factors for replantation failure.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the survival rate (80.8%) of the vein graft in fingertip amputation with segmental vessel defects was shown to be a possible option to increase the survival rates in case with segmental vessel defects where simple anastomosis could not be performed. However, avulsion type and zone II amputation are important risk factors of replantation failures.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较指尖离断伴节段性血管缺损患者采用静脉移植间置修复与单纯端端吻合修复的成活率及失败的相关危险因素。

患者和方法

2004 年至 2015 年,776 例(647 例男性,129 例女性)单指 I 区或 II 区离断患者接受再植术。其中 698 例采用单纯端端吻合修复,78 例指尖离断采用静脉移植间置修复动脉或静脉,或两者同时修复。比较两组成活率。采用 logistic 回归分析确定所有研究对象再植失败的危险因素。

结果

776 例再植中,713 例(91.9%)存活。末次随访时,单纯吻合组 698 例中 650 例(93.1%)存活;静脉移植组 78 例中 63 例(80.8%)存活(p>0.001)。logistic 回归分析显示,撕脱伤类型(优势比[OR]3.121;95%可信区间[CI]1.211-8.064;p=0.018)和 II 区离断(OR 2.370;95%CI 1.382-4.065;p=0.002)是再植失败的显著危险因素。

结论

本研究表明,静脉移植间置修复指尖离断伴节段性血管缺损的成活率(80.8%)可作为提高单纯端端吻合不能修复的节段性血管缺损成活率的一种选择。然而,撕脱伤类型和 II 区离断是再植失败的重要危险因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验