Suppr超能文献

三文鱼皮黏液蛋白质组学分析比较采样方法。

Proteomic profiling of salmon skin mucus for the comparison of sampling methods.

机构信息

Toxinology Research Group, Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway.

Fish Health Research Group, Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2020 Feb 1;1138:121965. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2019.121965. Epub 2019 Dec 31.

Abstract

The epidermal mucus protects fish against harmful environmental factors and the loss of physiological metabolites and water. It is an efficient barrier between the fish and the biosphere. The integrity of the skin mucus is thus of vital importance for the welfare and survival of the fish. Since excreted proteins and small molecules in the mucus can mirror the health status of the fish, it is a valuable matrix for monitoring stress, pathogen exposure, and nutritional effects. Several methods for sampling epidermal mucus from different fish species have previously been described, but information about their efficiency or the comparability of mucus analyses is lacking. In the present study, skin mucus from farmed Atlantic salmon was therefore sampled by three methods, including absorption or wiping with tissue paper, and scraping with a blunt blade, and the mucus proteome was analyzed by ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry. The measured protein contents, numbers, compositions and the observed data quality were compared between sampling methods. Furthermore, functional annotation and classification of the identified proteins was performed. The results showed that the three skin mucus sample types differed qualitatively as well as quantitatively. The absorbed mucus was the least tainted by proteins resulting from damage inflicted to the fish epidermis by the sampling procedure. Wiped mucus showed a better protein yield than absorbed and delivered a larger proteome of identifiable proteins, with less contamination from epithelial proteins than observed for scraped mucus. We recommend that future research of mucus should use the absorption method in cases, where it is important that the mucus is devoid of proteins from the underlying epithelium, and the wiping method, when protein yield is crucial or when the proteome of the outer epithelium is of interest.

摘要

表皮黏液可以保护鱼类免受有害环境因素、生理代谢物和水分流失的影响。它是鱼类与生物圈之间的有效屏障。因此,皮肤黏液的完整性对鱼类的福利和生存至关重要。由于黏液中排泄的蛋白质和小分子可以反映鱼类的健康状况,因此它是监测应激、病原体暴露和营养影响的有价值的基质。以前已经描述了从不同鱼类物种中采集表皮黏液的几种方法,但关于它们的效率或黏液分析的可比性的信息却缺乏。在本研究中,因此通过三种方法从养殖大西洋鲑鱼中采集皮肤黏液,包括用纸巾吸收或擦拭,以及用钝刀片刮取,并通过超高压液相色谱-高分辨率质谱分析黏液蛋白质组。比较了采样方法之间的测量蛋白质含量、数量、组成和观察到的数据质量。此外,还对鉴定出的蛋白质进行了功能注释和分类。结果表明,三种皮肤黏液样本类型在质量和数量上均存在差异。吸收的黏液受到采样过程中对鱼类表皮造成的损伤所产生的蛋白质污染最少。擦拭的黏液的蛋白质产量优于吸收的黏液,并且提供了更大的可识别蛋白质的蛋白质组,与刮取的黏液相比,上皮蛋白的污染较少。我们建议,在需要黏液不含底层上皮蛋白的情况下,未来的黏液研究应使用吸收法,而在蛋白质产量至关重要或对外层上皮的蛋白质组感兴趣的情况下,应使用擦拭法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验