Suppr超能文献

美国私人健康保险计划中选择性合同与医疗支出的关系。

The relation between selective contracting and healthcare expenditures in private health insurance plans in the United States.

机构信息

University of Vermont College of Medicine, United States.

University of Vermont College of Medicine, United States.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2020 Feb;124(2):174-182. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.12.008. Epub 2019 Dec 23.

Abstract

Many healthcare systems, including The Netherlands, Germany and Switzerland, have incorporated elements of managed competition, whereby insurers compete for enrollees in a marketplace organized or facilitated by a government or governing entity. In these countries, managed competition was introduced with the idea that the system would contain cost growth while maximizing value for consumers and employers. An important mechanism to control costs is selective contracting: the process of contracting providers into a network and offer insurance packages with varying levels of provider coverage. In these systems, enrollees are expected to choose lower cost plans which offer access to only contracted providers in the network. The questions is, however, if restricting provider choice leads to reduced healthcare expenditures. In the United States, enrollees often have a choice between plans with restricted networks of providers and plans that offer more provider choice, where care outside the contracted network of providers is (partly) covered. The purpose of this study is to understand whether insurance plans with restrictions on provider access in the United States have reduced healthcare expenditures and to identify the mechanism by which that reduction occurred. We used data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), a nationally representative sample of families and individuals. We estimated expenditures for enrollees in restricted network plans using two-part models and generalized linear models. We found that restricted network plans, on average, save $761 per enrollee. Our results suggest that cost savings due to restricted network plans are largely a result of price reductions rather than utilization reductions, although both play a role in cost savings. When introducing reforms shifting from a supply-oriented to a demand-oriented health care system, these findings might be worth considering by other countries.

摘要

许多医疗保健系统,包括荷兰、德国和瑞士,都采用了管理竞争的元素,即保险公司在政府或管理机构组织或协助的市场上竞争参保人。在这些国家,引入管理竞争的想法是,该系统将在为消费者和雇主提供最大价值的同时控制成本增长。控制成本的一个重要机制是选择性合同:将提供者纳入网络并提供具有不同提供者覆盖水平的保险套餐的过程。在这些系统中,预计参保人会选择成本较低的计划,这些计划只提供网络中签约的提供者的服务。然而,问题是,限制提供者的选择是否会导致医疗保健支出减少。在美国,参保人通常可以在提供者网络受限的计划和提供更多提供者选择的计划之间进行选择,而在网络之外的提供者那里接受的医疗服务是(部分)覆盖的。本研究的目的是了解美国限制提供者准入的保险计划是否降低了医疗保健支出,并确定实现这种降低的机制。我们使用了来自医疗支出调查(MEPS)的数据,这是一个具有代表性的家庭和个人样本。我们使用两部分模型和广义线性模型来估计受限网络计划参保人的支出。我们发现,受限网络计划平均为每位参保人节省 761 美元。我们的研究结果表明,受限网络计划的成本节约主要是由于价格降低而不是利用率降低,尽管两者都在成本节约中发挥了作用。在引入从以供应为导向向以需求为导向的医疗保健系统改革时,其他国家可能会考虑这些发现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验