Barhyte D Y, Glandon G L
Graduate Data Base Project, American Association of Colleges of Nursing, Washington, DC.
J Nurs Adm. 1988 Dec;18(12):16-9.
Prospective payment has created a desire for improved internal operating efficiency by nurse executives and hospital administrators. Identifying nursing costs is one step in obtaining those efficiencies. Improved nursing cost allocation methods have been developed but these systems are costly to implement. Finding a low cost alternative to such systems would be valuable. The authors present direct comparisons of conventional daily and acuity based nursing labor costs allocation systems. Consistent with the findings of others, they demonstrate substantial differences between these methods. There is a high correlation of nursing labor costs with the patient's ancillary costs. However, the correlation is not sufficiently strong to use as a proxy for nursing costs. Consequently, nurse executives should strive to implement nursing cost allocation systems.
前瞻性支付促使护士管理人员和医院行政人员渴望提高内部运营效率。确定护理成本是实现这些效率的其中一步。改进后的护理成本分配方法已经开发出来,但这些系统实施成本高昂。找到此类系统的低成本替代方案将很有价值。作者对传统的按日计算和基于 acuity 的护理劳动力成本分配系统进行了直接比较。与其他人的研究结果一致,他们证明了这些方法之间存在重大差异。护理劳动力成本与患者的辅助成本高度相关。然而,这种相关性不够强,无法用作护理成本的替代指标。因此,护士管理人员应努力实施护理成本分配系统。