• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物医学期刊中基本统计方法的报告:改进的SAMPL指南。

Reporting of Basic Statistical Methods in Biomedical Journals: Improved SAMPL Guidelines.

作者信息

Indrayan Abhaya

机构信息

Department of Clinical Research, Max Healthcare, Saket, New Delhi, India. Correspondence to: Dr Abhaya Indrayan, A-037 Telecom City, B-9/6 Sector 62, NOIDA 201 309, India.

出版信息

Indian Pediatr. 2020 Jan 15;57(1):43-48.

PMID:31937697
Abstract

Statistical methods have become an essential component of all empirical biomedical research. Science requires that these methods are fully reported with complete accuracy so that the evidence base could be fully appraised for validity, reliability, and generalizability. To meet this objective, Statistical Analyses and Methods in Published Literature (SAMPL) guidelines have been prepared for statistical reporting in biomedical publications. This communication proposes substantial improvement of these guidelines to make them more comprehensive, organized, compact, and easier to adopt.

摘要

统计方法已成为所有实证性生物医学研究的重要组成部分。科学要求这些方法要完全准确地充分报告,以便能对证据基础的有效性、可靠性和可推广性进行全面评估。为满足这一目标,已制定了《已发表文献中的统计分析和方法》(SAMPL)指南,用于生物医学出版物中的统计报告。本交流提议对这些指南进行大幅改进,使其更全面、有条理、紧凑且更易于采用。

相似文献

1
Reporting of Basic Statistical Methods in Biomedical Journals: Improved SAMPL Guidelines.生物医学期刊中基本统计方法的报告:改进的SAMPL指南。
Indian Pediatr. 2020 Jan 15;57(1):43-48.
2
Guidelines for reporting of statistics for clinical research in urology.泌尿外科临床研究统计学报告的指南。
BJU Int. 2019 Mar;123(3):401-410. doi: 10.1111/bju.14640. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
3
Reporting quality of statistical methods in surgical observational studies: protocol for systematic review.外科观察性研究中统计方法的报告质量:系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 28;3:70. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-70.
4
Quality of evidence published in clinical journals: signs of change?临床期刊发表的证据质量:有变化迹象吗?
Postgrad Med J. 2006 Jun;82(968):355-6. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2006.045138.
5
Critical analysis of the use of statistical tests in Brazilian publications related to digestive tract surgery.对巴西与消化道手术相关出版物中统计检验使用情况的批判性分析。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2011 Jan-Feb;57(1):35-41.
6
Guidelines for Reporting of Statistics for Clinical Research in Urology.泌尿外科临床研究统计学报告的指南。
Eur Urol. 2019 Mar;75(3):358-367. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.014. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
7
How often do leading biomedical journals use statistical experts to evaluate statistical methods? The results of a survey.主流生物医学期刊多久会使用统计专家来评估统计方法?一项调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 1;15(10):e0239598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239598. eCollection 2020.
8
[The importance of analysis in published evidence levels].[分析在已发表证据水平中的重要性]
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2011 Jan-Feb;57(1):1.
9
"There was no difference (p = 0.079)".“无差异(p = 0.079)”
Acta Orthop. 2021 Aug;92(4):371-372. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1903727. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
10
Implementation of SAMPL Guidelines in 100 clinical medicine articles: enhancing statistical reporting and recommendations for biomedical journals.100篇临床医学文章中SAMPL指南的实施:加强生物医学期刊的统计报告及建议
Clin Med (Lond). 2024 Oct 18:100257. doi: 10.1016/j.clinme.2024.100257.

引用本文的文献

1
Utility and safety of a novel method using a Wingman catheter for patients with lower extremity arterial disease complicated with severely calcified lesions: Wingman's bevel tip inner catheter removal technique-A prospective cohort study.一种使用翼人导管治疗下肢动脉疾病合并严重钙化病变患者的新方法的实用性和安全性:翼人斜面尖端内导管移除技术——一项前瞻性队列研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 25;6(9):e1586. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1586. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Orthopaedic knee scooter-related injury: prevalence and patient safety perception in a prospective cohort with exploratory risk factor analysis.骨科膝关节滑板车相关损伤:前瞻性队列研究中的患病率和患者安全感知,同时进行探索性危险因素分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Sep 2;18(1):649. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04124-6.
3
Use of appropriate statistical tools in biomedical research: Current trend & status.生物医学研究中适当统计工具的使用:当前趋势与现状。
Indian J Med Res. 2023 Apr;157(4):353-357. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_809_20.
4
Significant Differences and Experimental Designs Do Not Necessarily Imply Clinical Relevance: Effect Sizes and Causality Claims in Antidepressant Treatments.显著差异和实验设计并不一定意味着具有临床相关性:抗抑郁治疗中的效应大小和因果关系声明
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 28;12(9):3181. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093181.
5
Retrospective multicenter registry for endovascular treatment with newer devices in over 25-cm femoropopliteal artery disease: A retrospective observational study.25厘米以上股腘动脉疾病采用新型器械进行血管内治疗的回顾性多中心登记研究:一项回顾性观察研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 20;6(1):e1003. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1003. eCollection 2023 Jan.
6
The development of QERM scoring system for comprehensive assessment of the Quality of Empirical Research in Medicine - Part 1.QERM 评分系统的发展用于全面评估医学实证研究的质量 - 第 1 部分。
J Postgrad Med. 2022 Oct-Dec;68(4):221-230. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_460_22.
7
Low test-retest reliability of a protocol for assessing somatosensory cortex excitability generated from sensory nerves of the lower back.一种用于评估源自下背部感觉神经的体感皮层兴奋性的方案,其重测信度较低。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Aug 23;16:898759. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.898759. eCollection 2022.
8
Patient Utilization of Online Information and its Influence on Orthopedic Surgeon Selection: Cross-sectional Survey of Patient Beliefs and Behaviors.患者对在线信息的利用及其对骨科医生选择的影响:患者信念与行为的横断面调查
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jan 19;6(1):e22586. doi: 10.2196/22586.
9
Towards Good Statistical Practice. CORSTAN Validated Questionnaire for Assessing the Correctness of Statistical Analysis in Medical Research.迈向良好的统计实践。评估医学研究中统计分析正确性的 CORSTAN 验证问卷。
Probl Endokrinol (Mosk). 2021 Oct 19;67(6):11-17. doi: 10.14341/probl12797.
10
P-value and effect-size in clinical and experimental studies.临床和实验研究中的P值与效应量
J Vasc Bras. 2021 Jul 5;20:e20210038. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.210038. eCollection 2021.