Kitamura Takayuki, Oishi Hidenori, Fujii Takashi, Teranishi Kohsuke, Yatomi Kenji, Yamamoto Munetaka, Arai Hajime
Department of Neuroendovascular Therapy, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
NMC Case Rep J. 2019 Dec 18;7(1):5-10. doi: 10.2176/nmccrj.cr.2018-0319. eCollection 2020 Jan.
There have recently been reports of patients who developed postprocedural symptoms or alterations due to delayed foreign body embolisms observed in imaging findings. Polymer coating of devices have been described as a possible cause of foreign body embolisms, manifesting in delayed granulomatous responses and exhibiting characteristic imaging findings. In four of 4,025 patients who underwent coil embolization in our hospital or its affiliated facilities, similar findings were observed. Delayed lesions appeared between 1 month and 1 year after the procedures. There was extensive edema in the perfusion area of the treated vessels. In two cases examined by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, multiple solid enhancing lesions within vasogenic edema were observed. Biopsy revealed a membranous foreign body in a blood vessel with surrounding foreign body granuloma formation in 1 case. Because these findings are similar to those of cases reported previously, they were considered as a foreign body embolism due to coating separations from the devices. Polymer coating separation occurs most frequently from guidewires. Especially if a metal introducer is used, the risk of separation increases. Surgeons should carefully follow the manufacturers' instructions when they use these devices and should acknowledge and report any events that may occur. Although these complications are extremely rare, further studies are warranted of similar cases; and we should prepare and share information on these intravascular devices for wide-scale dissemination in the industry.
最近有报道称,患者在成像检查中发现因迟发性异物栓塞而出现术后症状或改变。装置的聚合物涂层被认为是异物栓塞的一个可能原因,表现为迟发性肉芽肿反应并呈现出特征性的成像表现。在我院或其附属机构接受线圈栓塞治疗的4025例患者中,有4例观察到类似的表现。迟发性病变出现在术后1个月至1年之间。治疗血管的灌注区域出现广泛水肿。在2例接受对比增强磁共振成像检查的病例中,在血管源性水肿内观察到多个实性强化病变。活检显示1例血管内有膜状异物,周围有异物肉芽肿形成。由于这些表现与先前报道的病例相似,因此被认为是由于装置涂层分离导致的异物栓塞。聚合物涂层分离最常发生在导丝上。特别是如果使用金属导入器,分离的风险会增加。外科医生在使用这些装置时应仔细遵循制造商的说明,并应认识到并报告可能发生的任何事件。尽管这些并发症极为罕见,但仍有必要对类似病例进行进一步研究;并且我们应该准备并分享有关这些血管内装置的信息,以便在行业内广泛传播。