• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

仍然屹立不倒:科罗拉多前岭以白皮松为主的森林中,火灾后针叶树避难所的近期格局。

Still standing: Recent patterns of post-fire conifer refugia in ponderosa pine-dominated forests of the Colorado Front Range.

机构信息

The Nature Conservancy, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.

Department of Geography, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):e0226926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226926. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0226926
PMID:31940320
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6961861/
Abstract

Forested fire refugia (trees that survive fires) are important disturbance legacies that provide seed sources for post-fire regeneration. Conifer regeneration has been limited following some recent western fires, particularly in ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests. However, the extent, characteristics, and predictability of ponderosa pine fire refugia are largely unknown. Within 23 fires in ponderosa pine-dominated forests of the Colorado Front Range (1996-2013), we evaluated the spatial characteristics and predictability of refugia: first using Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) burn severity metrics, then using landscape variables (topography, weather, anthropogenic factors, and pre-fire forest cover). Using 1-m resolution aerial imagery, we created a binary variable of post-fire conifer presence ('Conifer Refugia') and absence ('Conifer Absence') within 30-m grid cells. We found that maximum patch size of Conifer Absence was positively correlated with fire size, and 38% of the burned area was ≥ 50m from a conifer seed source, revealing a management challenge as fire sizes increase with warming further limiting conifer recovery. In predicting Conifer Refugia with two MTBS-produced databases, thematic burn severity classes (TBSC) and continuous Relative differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (RdNBR) values, Conifer Absence was high in previously forested areas of Low and Moderate burn severity classes in TBSC. RdNBR more accurately identified post-fire conifer survivorship. In predicting Conifer Refugia with landscape variables, Conifer Refugia were less likely during burn days with high maximum temperatures: while Conifer Refugia were more likely on moister soils and closer to higher order streams, homes, and roads; and on less rugged, valley topography. Importantly, pre-fire forest canopy cover was not strongly associated with Conifer Refugia. This study further informs forest management by mapping post-fire patches lacking conifer seed sources, validating the use of RdNBR for fire refugia, and detecting abiotic and topographic variables that may promote conifer refugia.

摘要

森林火灾避难所(能够在火灾中幸存的树木)是重要的干扰遗产,为火灾后再生提供种子来源。最近的一些西部火灾,特别是在黄松(Pinus ponderosa)森林中,限制了针叶树的再生。然而,黄松火灾避难所的范围、特征和可预测性在很大程度上是未知的。在科罗拉多前缘(1996-2013 年)的黄松主导的森林中,我们评估了避难所的空间特征和可预测性:首先使用监测燃烧严重程度趋势(MTBS)燃烧严重程度指标,然后使用景观变量(地形、天气、人为因素和火灾前森林覆盖)。使用 1 米分辨率的航空图像,我们在 30 米网格单元内创建了一个二进制变量,即火灾后针叶树存在(“针叶树避难所”)和不存在(“针叶树不存在”)。我们发现,针叶树不存在的最大斑块大小与火灾大小呈正相关,并且 38%的燃烧面积距离针叶树种子源≥50m,这表明随着气候变暖,火灾规模进一步增大,限制了针叶树的恢复,这是一个管理上的挑战。在使用两个 MTBS 生成的数据库(专题燃烧严重程度类(TBSC)和连续相对差分归一化燃烧比(RdNBR)值)预测针叶树避难所时,TBSC 中低和中等级别的先前森林区域的针叶树不存在的比例较高。RdNBR 更准确地识别了火灾后的针叶树存活率。在使用景观变量预测针叶树避难所时,在最高温度较高的燃烧日,针叶树避难所的可能性较小:而在更潮湿的土壤上,在靠近较高等级溪流、房屋和道路的地方,以及在较不崎岖的山谷地形上,针叶树避难所的可能性更大。重要的是,火灾前森林冠层覆盖与针叶树避难所没有很强的相关性。本研究通过绘制缺乏针叶树种子来源的火灾后斑块,进一步为森林管理提供了信息,验证了 RdNBR 在火灾避难所中的使用,并检测了可能促进针叶树避难所的非生物和地形变量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/6961861/45f41e758cba/pone.0226926.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/6961861/50abadfd0db6/pone.0226926.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/6961861/7ffa5e2ec6a3/pone.0226926.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/6961861/0c6d7f4e7e12/pone.0226926.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/6961861/fd000fe3c619/pone.0226926.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/6961861/19b087f60245/pone.0226926.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/6961861/55bd8507a784/pone.0226926.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/6961861/fcaae1d15ab1/pone.0226926.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/6961861/32742a0ba8af/pone.0226926.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/6961861/45f41e758cba/pone.0226926.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/6961861/50abadfd0db6/pone.0226926.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/6961861/7ffa5e2ec6a3/pone.0226926.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/6961861/0c6d7f4e7e12/pone.0226926.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/6961861/fd000fe3c619/pone.0226926.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/6961861/19b087f60245/pone.0226926.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/6961861/55bd8507a784/pone.0226926.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/6961861/fcaae1d15ab1/pone.0226926.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/6961861/32742a0ba8af/pone.0226926.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/6961861/45f41e758cba/pone.0226926.g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Still standing: Recent patterns of post-fire conifer refugia in ponderosa pine-dominated forests of the Colorado Front Range.仍然屹立不倒:科罗拉多前岭以白皮松为主的森林中,火灾后针叶树避难所的近期格局。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):e0226926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226926. eCollection 2020.
2
Examining historical and current mixed-severity fire regimes in ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of western North America.考察北美西部的黄松和混交林的历史和当前混合严重度火模式。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 3;9(2):e87852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087852. eCollection 2014.
3
Refuge-yeah or refuge-nah? Predicting locations of forest resistance and recruitment in a fiery world.避难所——赞成还是反对?在火热的世界中预测森林抵抗力和繁殖力的位置。
Glob Chang Biol. 2023 Dec;29(24):7029-7050. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16939. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
4
Where and why do conifer forests persist in refugia through multiple fire events?在多次火灾事件中,为什么和在何处的针阔混交林能够在避难所中持续存在?
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Aug;27(15):3642-3656. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15655. Epub 2021 May 21.
5
Limitations to recovery following wildfire in dry forests of southern Colorado and northern New Mexico, USA.美国科罗拉多州南部和新墨西哥州北部干旱森林野火后的恢复限制。
Ecol Appl. 2020 Jan;30(1):e02001. doi: 10.1002/eap.2001. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
6
Low- and moderate-severity fire offers key insights for landscape restoration in ponderosa pine forests.低强度和中强度火灾为白皮松森林的景观恢复提供了重要的见解。
Ecol Appl. 2022 Mar;32(2):e2490. doi: 10.1002/eap.2490. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
7
Fortifying the forest: thinning and burning increase resistance to a bark beetle outbreak and promote forest resilience.强化森林:间伐和火烧可增强对树皮甲虫爆发的抵抗力并促进森林恢复力。
Ecol Appl. 2016 Oct;26(7):1984-2000. doi: 10.1002/eap.1363. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
8
Multidecadal vegetation transformations of a New Mexico ponderosa pine landscape after severe fires and aerial seeding.新墨西哥州严重火灾和空中播种后多十年尺度的辐射松景观植被变化。
Ecol Appl. 2024 Sep;34(6):e3008. doi: 10.1002/eap.3008. Epub 2024 Jul 21.
9
Recent bark beetle outbreaks influence wildfire severity in mixed-conifer forests of the Sierra Nevada, California, USA.近年来,树皮甲虫的爆发影响了美国加利福尼亚州内华达山脉混交林的野火严重程度。
Ecol Appl. 2021 Apr;31(3):e02287. doi: 10.1002/eap.2287. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
10
Average Stand Age from Forest Inventory Plots Does Not Describe Historical Fire Regimes in Ponderosa Pine and Mixed-Conifer Forests of Western North America.森林资源清查样地的平均林分年龄无法描述北美西部黄松和针叶混交林的历史火灾状况。
PLoS One. 2016 May 19;11(5):e0147688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147688. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Limitations to recovery following wildfire in dry forests of southern Colorado and northern New Mexico, USA.美国科罗拉多州南部和新墨西哥州北部干旱森林野火后的恢复限制。
Ecol Appl. 2020 Jan;30(1):e02001. doi: 10.1002/eap.2001. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
2
Large-scale forest restoration stabilizes carbon under climate change in Southwest United States.大规模森林恢复稳定了美国西南部气候变化下的碳。
Ecol Appl. 2019 Dec;29(8):e01979. doi: 10.1002/eap.1979. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
3
Wildfire refugia in forests: Severe fire weather and drought mute the influence of topography and fuel age.
森林中的野火避难所:恶劣的火灾天气和干旱减弱了地形和燃料年龄的影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Nov;25(11):3829-3843. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14735. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
4
Wildfires and climate change push low-elevation forests across a critical climate threshold for tree regeneration.野火和气候变化推动低海拔森林跨越了树木再生的关键气候阈值。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 26;116(13):6193-6198. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1815107116. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
5
Evidence for declining forest resilience to wildfires under climate change.气候变化下森林野火恢复力下降的证据。
Ecol Lett. 2018 Feb;21(2):243-252. doi: 10.1111/ele.12889. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
6
Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests.人为气候变化对美国西部森林野火的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Oct 18;113(42):11770-11775. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607171113. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
7
High resolution mapping of development in the wildland-urban interface using object based image extraction.利用基于对象的图像提取技术对城乡结合部发展进行高分辨率测绘。
Heliyon. 2016 Oct 6;2(10):e00174. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00174. eCollection 2016 Oct.
8
Restoring forest structure and process stabilizes forest carbon in wildfire-prone southwestern ponderosa pine forests.恢复森林结构和生态过程可稳定易发生野火的美国西南部黄松林的森林碳储量。
Ecol Appl. 2016 Mar;26(2):382-91. doi: 10.1890/15-0337.
9
Ecologically-Relevant Maps of Landforms and Physiographic Diversity for Climate Adaptation Planning.用于气候适应规划的地形和地貌多样性的生态相关地图。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 7;10(12):e0143619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143619. eCollection 2015.
10
A multifaceted trophic cascade in a detritus-based system: density-, trait-, or processing-chain-mediated effects?基于碎屑的系统中的多方面营养级联:密度、性状还是加工链介导的影响?
Ecosphere. 2015 Mar;6(3). doi: 10.1890/ES14-00365.1.