Suppr超能文献

对碳酸锂的反应。

Response to lithium carbonate.

作者信息

Krishna N R, Taylor M A, Abrams R

出版信息

Biol Psychiatry. 1978 Oct;13(5):601-6.

PMID:31948
Abstract

We examined the clinical and research records of 29 acutely ill hospitalized patients with affective disorder who received only lithium carbonate during their first week of treatment. Nineteen patients (Group I) could be continued on lithium ion alone, while 10 patients (Group 2) needed additional somatic treatment. Compared with Group 1, Group 2 patients were significantly younger at illness onset, more severely ill on admission, clinically more "colorful" in dress and behavior, stayed more than twice as long in the hospital, and (although not statistically significant) had more than twice the morbidity risk for affective disorder in first-degree relatives. At discharge, both groups were equally improved, and 70% of Group 2 patients were receiving lithium alone. We did not confirm previous reports that nonresponders to lithium alone (Group 2) were more overactive or paranoid--destructive or less euphoric--grandiose than responders to lithium alone (Group 1). Our Group 2 patients had a more severe or penetrant form of illness than our Group 1 patients, requiring neuroleptic drugs or ECT in addition to lithium therapy. Eventually, however, they had a satisfactory outcome, suggesting therapeutic optimism and tenacity even in those patients who initially fail lithium alone and require polytreatment.

摘要

我们检查了29名因情感障碍而急性住院的患者的临床和研究记录,这些患者在治疗的第一周仅接受碳酸锂治疗。19名患者(第一组)可以仅继续使用锂离子治疗,而10名患者(第二组)需要额外的躯体治疗。与第一组相比,第二组患者发病时明显更年轻,入院时病情更严重,在穿着和行为上临床上更“花哨”,住院时间是第一组的两倍多,并且(尽管无统计学意义)一级亲属患情感障碍的发病风险是第一组的两倍多。出院时,两组患者的病情改善程度相同,第二组70%的患者仅接受锂治疗。我们没有证实之前的报告,即仅对锂治疗无反应者(第二组)比仅对锂治疗有反应者(第一组)更多动或偏执——有破坏性行为或更少欣快——夸大。我们的第二组患者的病情比第一组患者更严重或更具侵袭性,除锂治疗外还需要使用抗精神病药物或电休克治疗。然而,最终他们取得了令人满意的结果,这表明即使是那些最初单独使用锂治疗失败且需要综合治疗的患者,治疗前景也是乐观的,并且需要坚持治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验