Suppr超能文献

物理治疗师评估与心理患者报告结局测量在腰痛患者中的差异。

Difference between physical therapist estimation and psychological patient-reported outcome measures in patients with low back pain.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Sapporo Maruyama Orthopedic Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.

Department of Orthopedic, Sapporo Maruyama Orthopedic Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jan 21;15(1):e0227999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227999. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Minimizing the number of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can reduce patient burden. The primary aim of the present study was to investigate whether physical therapists (PTs) can estimate psychological PROM scores in patients with low back pain (LBP) through physical therapy evaluation. The secondary aims were; 1) to investigate whether the clinical experiences of PTs influence correlations between PT estimates and psychological PROM scores, and 2) to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of PT estimates for the psychological features detected by the PROMs. We recruited hospitalized patients owing to LBP, who underwent evaluation by PTs on the initial day of hospitalization. Patients completed PROMs, including the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale immediately before the initial physical therapy session. PTs rated the magnitude of patient kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; 0 = not detected at all, 10 = very highly detected) through physical therapy evaluation immediately after the initial session. The PTs were blinded to the PROM results. We categorized PTs into two subgroups (PTs with ≥4 years and those with <4 years of clinical experience). Data from 78 patients (mean [SD] age = 60.5 [16.3] years) and 21 PTs were analyzed. A statistically significant but weak correlation (P = .04, Spearman's ρ = .24) was detected only in the total PCS scores and PT NRS scores in a dataset of all patients and PTs. Further, there were no statistically significant differences in correlations (all P >.05) between the two subgroups of PTs in all measures. Low sensitivity and high specificity of PT estimates for psychological features through physical therapy evaluation were identified in all PROMs when PT NRS scores were categorized into the binary score by 5 (negative: <5; positive: ≥5).

摘要

减少患者报告结局测量(PROMs)的数量可以减轻患者的负担。本研究的主要目的是调查物理治疗师(PTs)是否可以通过物理治疗评估来估计患有下腰痛(LBP)的患者的心理 PROM 评分。次要目的是:1)调查 PTs 的临床经验是否会影响 PT 估计值与心理 PROM 评分之间的相关性,2)调查 PT 估计值对 PROMs 检测到的心理特征的敏感性和特异性。我们招募了因 LBP 住院的患者,他们在住院的第一天接受了 PTs 的评估。患者在初始物理治疗前立即完成了 PROMs,包括疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)、坦帕运动恐惧量表(Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia)和医院焦虑抑郁量表(Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)。PTs 通过初始治疗后的物理治疗评估,使用 11 点数字评定量表(NRS;0=根本未检测到,10=高度检测到)对患者运动恐惧、疼痛灾难化、焦虑和抑郁的程度进行评分。PTs 对 PROM 结果一无所知。我们将 PTs 分为两组(临床经验≥4 年和<4 年)。共分析了 78 名患者(平均[标准差]年龄=60.5[16.3]岁)和 21 名 PTs 的数据。仅在所有患者和 PTs 的数据集总 PCS 评分和 PT NRS 评分中检测到具有统计学意义但较弱的相关性(P=.04,Spearman ρ=.24)。进一步,在所有措施中,两组 PTs 之间的相关性均无统计学差异(所有 P>.05)。当将 PT NRS 评分分为 5 分时(阴性:<5;阳性:≥5),通过物理治疗评估的 PT 估计值对所有 PROMs 中的心理特征的敏感性低而特异性高。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Therapeutic exercise following lumbar spine surgery: a narrative review.腰椎手术后的治疗性运动:一项叙述性综述。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 May 30;23:100620. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100620. eCollection 2025 Sep.

本文引用的文献

4
Use of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) in Japan.物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)在日本的应用。
Phys Ther Res. 2016 Dec 1;19(1):58-66. doi: 10.1298/ptr.e9881. eCollection 2016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验