Mauguière F, Desmedt J E
Department of EEG and Epileptology, Faculty of Medicine Lyon-Nord, France.
Arch Neurol. 1988 Dec;45(12):1312-20. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1988.00520360030007.
In 30 patients with a thalamic vascular lesion and clinical somatosensory disturbances in the opposite hemibody without hemiplegia, four nosological groups were identified: group 1 had no central pain but complete hemianesthesia and loss of cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) on the affected side (analgic thalamic syndrome). Group 2 had central pain, severe hypoesthesia, and loss of cortical SEPs. Group 3 had central pain and hypoesthesia, with cortical SEPs present, although reduced or delayed on the affected side. Group 4 had central pain with preserved touch and joint sensations and normal SEPs (pure algetic thalamic syndrome). Clinical signs and SEP titration of the actual involvement of lemniscal pathways in these four groups of patients with thalamic syndrome are discussed in relation to current pathophysiology of central pain.
在30例丘脑血管病变且对侧半身存在临床躯体感觉障碍但无偏瘫的患者中,确定了四个病种组:第1组无中枢性疼痛,但存在完全性偏身感觉缺失且患侧皮质体感诱发电位(SEP)消失(痛觉缺失性丘脑综合征)。第2组有中枢性疼痛、严重感觉减退和皮质SEP消失。第3组有中枢性疼痛和感觉减退,皮质SEP存在,尽管患侧的SEP降低或延迟。第4组有中枢性疼痛,但触觉和关节感觉保留且SEP正常(纯痛觉性丘脑综合征)。结合当前中枢性疼痛的病理生理学,讨论了这四组丘脑综合征患者中lemniscal通路实际受累情况的临床体征和SEP滴定。