• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护病房中的抗生素皮肤试验:一项系统评价

Antibiotic Skin Testing in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Alharbi Homood A

机构信息

Homood A. Alharbi is an assistant professor, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Crit Care Nurse. 2019 Dec 1;39(6):e1-e9. doi: 10.4037/ccn2019207.

DOI:10.4037/ccn2019207
PMID:31961941
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent research has shown that a large majority of patients with a history of penicillin allergy are acutely tolerant of penicillins and that there is no clinically significant immunologic cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins or other β-lactams. The standard test to confirm acute tolerance is challenge with a therapeutic dose. Skin testing is useful only when the culprit antibiotic can haptenate serum proteins and induce an immunoglobulin E-mediated reaction and the clinical history demonstrates such high risk that a direct oral challenge may result in anaphylaxis.

OBJECTIVE

To review and evaluate the current practice of skin testing for antibiotics (other than penicillin) in critically ill patients by means of a systematic literature review.

METHODS

This systematic review was performed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Several electronic databases were searched using the following terms: antibiotics, skin test (tests, testing), intensive care, intensive care unit, ICU, critical care, critical care unit.

RESULTS

Twenty-three articles were identified for inclusion in this review. The results indicate a lack of standardized skin testing for all antibiotics in critical care settings. Oral challenge with nonirritating concentrations of antibiotics can be helpful in determining allergy to these drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Critical care providers should evaluate antibiotic allergy using nonirritating concentrations before administering antibiotics to patients. Introduction of a standardized skin test for all antibiotics in intensive care unit patients to help select the most appropriate antibiotic treatment regimen might help save lives and reduce costs.

摘要

背景

最近的研究表明,绝大多数有青霉素过敏史的患者对青霉素具有急性耐受性,并且青霉素与头孢菌素或其他β-内酰胺类药物之间不存在具有临床意义的免疫交叉反应。确认急性耐受性的标准测试是给予治疗剂量进行激发试验。皮肤试验仅在可疑抗生素能够使血清蛋白半抗原化并引发免疫球蛋白E介导的反应,且临床病史显示直接口服激发试验可能导致过敏反应的高风险时才有用。

目的

通过系统的文献综述,回顾和评估重症患者对抗生素(非青霉素)进行皮肤试验的当前做法。

方法

本系统综述按照PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南进行。使用以下术语检索了几个电子数据库:抗生素、皮肤试验(测试、检测)、重症监护、重症监护病房、ICU、危重症护理、危重症护理病房。

结果

确定了23篇文章纳入本综述。结果表明,在重症监护环境中,所有抗生素的皮肤试验缺乏标准化。使用无刺激性浓度的抗生素进行口服激发试验有助于确定对这些药物的过敏情况。

结论

重症监护提供者在给患者使用抗生素之前,应使用无刺激性浓度评估抗生素过敏情况。在重症监护病房患者中引入针对所有抗生素的标准化皮肤试验,以帮助选择最合适的抗生素治疗方案,可能有助于挽救生命并降低成本。

相似文献

1
Antibiotic Skin Testing in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review.重症监护病房中的抗生素皮肤试验:一项系统评价
Crit Care Nurse. 2019 Dec 1;39(6):e1-e9. doi: 10.4037/ccn2019207.
2
Use of a Penicillin Allergy Screening Algorithm and Penicillin Skin Testing for Transitioning Hospitalized Patients to First-Line Antibiotic Therapy.使用青霉素过敏筛查算法和青霉素皮试,将住院患者过渡到一线抗生素治疗。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Jul-Aug;6(4):1349-1355. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
3
Practical aspects of choosing an antibiotic for patients with a reported allergy to an antibiotic.为报告对抗生素过敏的患者选择抗生素的实际问题。
Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Jul 1;35(1):26-31. doi: 10.1086/340740. Epub 2002 Jun 5.
4
Oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (ORACLE): a pilot safety and feasibility randomised controlled trial.口腔挑战与常规护理评估危重症住院患者低风险青霉素过敏(ORACLE):一项安全性和可行性的初步随机对照试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Jun;50(6):913-921. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07448-x. Epub 2024 May 13.
5
Antibiotic allergy labels in hospitalized and critically ill adults: A review of current impacts of inaccurate labelling.住院和重症成人抗生素过敏标签:不准确标签当前影响的综述。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Mar;85(3):492-500. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13830. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
6
Drug allergy evaluation for betalactam hypersensitivity: Cross-reactivity with cephalosporines, carbapenems and negative predictive value.药物过敏评估β内酰胺类药物过敏:与头孢菌素、碳青霉烯类药物的交叉反应和阴性预测值。
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2018 Mar;36(1):27-31. doi: 10.12932/AP0853.
7
Diagnosis of penicillin allergy revisited: the value of case history, skin testing, specific IgE and prolonged challenge.重新审视青霉素过敏的诊断:病史、皮肤试验、特异性 IgE 和延长激发试验的价值。
Allergy. 2013 Aug;68(8):1057-64. doi: 10.1111/all.12195. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
8
Safety and effectiveness of a preoperative allergy clinic in decreasing vancomycin use in patients with a history of penicillin allergy.术前过敏门诊在减少有青霉素过敏史患者万古霉素使用方面的安全性和有效性。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006 Nov;97(5):681-7. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61100-3.
9
A pilot study of penicillin skin testing in patients with a history of penicillin allergy admitted to a medical ICU.对入住内科重症监护病房且有青霉素过敏史患者进行青霉素皮肤试验的一项初步研究。
Chest. 2000 Oct;118(4):1106-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.4.1106.
10
Penicillin skin testing: potential implications for antimicrobial stewardship.青霉素皮肤试验:对抗菌药物管理的潜在影响。
Pharmacotherapy. 2013 Aug;33(8):856-67. doi: 10.1002/phar.1288. Epub 2013 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenging the Efficacy of Routine Antibiotic Skin Testing: Insights From Two Cases of Anaphylaxis.质疑常规抗生素皮肤试验的有效性:两例过敏反应病例的启示
Cureus. 2025 May 24;17(5):e84729. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84729. eCollection 2025 May.