Suppr超能文献

自酸蚀与酸蚀冲洗型牙本质黏结剂的细胞毒性:一项筛选研究。

Cytotoxicity of Self-Etch Versus Etch-and-Rinse Dentin Adhesives: A Screening Study.

作者信息

Fröb Luisa, Rüttermann Stefan, Romanos Georgios E, Herrmann Eva, Gerhardt-Szép Susanne

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental School (Carolinum), Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, NY 11794, USA.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2020 Jan 17;13(2):452. doi: 10.3390/ma13020452.

Abstract

Six dentin adhesives were tested in vitro regarding their cytotoxicity on human fibroblasts. The adhesives Hybrid Bond, One-up Bond F Plus, AdheSE, Clearfil SE Bond, Optibond Solo Plus and Syntac were eluted with culture medium as single or sequentially applied adhesive part for 24 h. 75 Petri dishes were produced per group. They were evaluated triangulated, comprising the quantitative evaluation (105 ones) to determine "viable", "dead" and "debris" cells with the use of a cell-counter and the reactivity index was also identified based on the qualitative assessment (420 ones). One-up Bond F Plus, AdheSE and Clearfil SE Bond showed a statistical difference of viable cells to the cell control. For One-up Bond F Plus, statistically, differences compared to hybrid bond and Syntac were also found. All the adhesives except One-up Bond F Plus showed significant differences between single and sequentially applied adhesive part regarding the quantitative evaluation. The test material showed a moderate grade of cytotoxicity. As a result, a statistically significant difference of the cytotoxicity between the self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives cannot be demonstrated regarding the qualitative evaluation and the reactivity index, but the differences between sequentially applied and single applied components can be proved.

摘要

对六种牙本质粘结剂进行了体外测试,以研究它们对人成纤维细胞的细胞毒性。将粘结剂Hybrid Bond、One-up Bond F Plus、AdheSE、Clearfil SE Bond、Optibond Solo Plus和Syntac用培养基洗脱,作为单次或顺序应用的粘结剂部分,洗脱24小时。每组制作75个培养皿。对其进行三角测量评估,包括定量评估(105个),使用细胞计数器确定“活”、“死”和“碎片”细胞,并基于定性评估(420个)确定反应性指数。One-up Bond F Plus、AdheSE和Clearfil SE Bond与细胞对照相比,活细胞数有统计学差异。对于One-up Bond F Plus,在统计学上,与Hybrid Bond和Syntac相比也有差异。除One-up Bond F Plus外,所有粘结剂在单次和顺序应用粘结剂部分的定量评估方面均存在显著差异。测试材料显示出中等程度的细胞毒性。因此,在定性评估和反应性指数方面,自酸蚀粘结剂和酸蚀冲洗粘结剂之间的细胞毒性无统计学显著差异,但顺序应用和单次应用成分之间的差异可以得到证实。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b01/7013582/07e929afd7b6/materials-13-00452-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验