Faculty of Health Science, University of Canberra, Kirinari Street, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia.
Faculty of Business, Government & Law, University of Canberra, Kirinari Street, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia.
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Apr 1;35(3):346-353. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz165.
This study critically evaluates the adoption of a universal healthcare system recently introduced by the Indonesian government in 2014. Our study is driven by the lack of critical analysis of social and political factors and unintended consequences of New Public Management, which is evident in the healthcare sector reforms in emerging economies. This study not only examines the impact of economic and political forces surrounding the introduction of a universal health insurance programme in the country but also offers insights into the critical challenges and undesirable outcomes of a fundamental reform of the healthcare sector in Indonesia. Through a systematic and detailed review of prior studies, legal sources and reports from government and media organizations about the implementation and progress of an UHC health insurance programme in Indonesia, the authors find that a more democratic political system that emerged in 1998 created the opportunity for politicians and international financial aid agencies to introduce a universal social security administration agency called Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial (BPJS). Despite the introduction of BPJS to expand the health services' coverage, this effort faces critical challenges and unintended outcomes including: (1) increased financial deficits, (2) resistance from medical professionals and (3) politicians' tendency to blame BPJS's management for failing to pay healthcare services costs. We argue that the adoption of the insurance system was primarily motivated by politicians' own interests and those of international agencies at the expense of a sustainable national healthcare system. This study contributes to the healthcare industry policy literature by showing that a poorly designed UHC system could and will undermine the core values of healthcare services. It will also threaten the sustainability of the medical profession in Indonesia. The authors offer several suggestions for devising better policies in this sector in the developing nations.
本研究批判性地评估了印度尼西亚政府于 2014 年引入的全民医疗保健系统。我们的研究是由对新公共管理的社会和政治因素以及意外后果缺乏批判性分析所驱动的,这在新兴经济体的医疗保健部门改革中显而易见。本研究不仅考察了在该国引入全民健康保险计划所涉及的经济和政治力量的影响,还深入探讨了印度尼西亚医疗保健部门全面改革所面临的关键挑战和不良后果。通过对先前研究、法律来源以及政府和媒体组织关于印度尼西亚全民医疗保险计划实施和进展的报告进行系统和详细的回顾,作者发现,1998 年出现的更加民主的政治制度为政治家和国际金融援助机构提供了机会,引入了一个名为 Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial(BPJS)的全民社会保障管理机构。尽管引入 BPJS 是为了扩大医疗服务的覆盖范围,但这一努力面临着严峻的挑战和意外的后果,包括:(1)财政赤字增加;(2)医疗专业人员的抵制;(3)政治家倾向于将 BPJS 的管理不善归咎于未能支付医疗服务费用。我们认为,保险制度的采用主要是出于政治家自身利益和国际机构的利益,而牺牲了可持续的国家医疗保健系统。本研究通过表明设计不佳的全民医疗保险制度可能会破坏医疗服务的核心价值观,并威胁到印度尼西亚医疗行业的可持续性,为医疗保健行业政策文献做出了贡献。作者为发展中国家在该领域制定更好的政策提供了一些建议。