Blain Hugues-Alexandre, Lózano-Fernández Iván, Böhme Gottfried
IPHES, Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social, c/ Marcel · lí Domingo s/n (Edifici W3), Campus Sescelades, 43007 Tarragona, Spain.
Area de Prehistoria, Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV), Avinguda de Catalunya 35, 43002 Tarragona, Spain.
Zool Stud. 2015 Jan 8;54:e5. doi: 10.1186/s40555-014-0094-3. eCollection 2015.
In the opinion of all field herpetologists and archaeozoologists, green frogs (living and sub-fossil specimens)are among the most difficult European amphibians to identify. Here, we examine the intra- and interspecific variation in both continuous and discrete iliac characters for refining the criteria for species-level identification among Europeangreen frogs , andtheir associated klepton kl. (Amphibia,Ranidae).
Atotal of 454 ilia of modern green frogs from the former German Democratic Republic have been studied: 168 for (86of males and 82 of females), 118 for (44of males and 74 of females) and 168 for kl. (86of males and 82 of females). The origin, sex, population structure and phenotype are known for each of the studied specimens. Eight variables have been taken (one angle and seven measurements), mainly on the distal part of the element in order to be able to apply them to fragmentary fossil ilia. Interspecific variations, sexual dimorphism and population structure have been investigated. Results suggest that the secure determination of a single fossil ilium at species level is quite impossible, but that at population level, it may be possible to distinguish between a 'pure' species or a 'pure' species plus its cohabiting hybrid form, as some minor differences have been evidencedin particular in the angle of the inrelation to iliac's main axis (character 2) and the width of the (character8); two parameters significantly non size-dependent. No sexual dimorphism has been detected, except for .
We propose here a new biometrical method in order to differentiate between the fossil ilia of central European water frogs (genus ) at population level.
在所有野外两栖动物学家和古动物学家看来,绿蛙(活体和亚化石标本)是欧洲最难鉴定的两栖动物之一。在此,我们研究了连续和离散髂骨特征的种内和种间变异,以完善欧洲绿蛙及其相关隐存种(两栖纲,蛙科)物种水平鉴定的标准。
对来自前德意志民主共和国的454块现代绿蛙髂骨进行了研究:168块属于绿蛙指名亚种(86块雄性和82块雌性),118块属于绿蛙林蛙(44块雄性和74块雌性),168块属于隐存种(86块雄性和82块雌性)。每个研究标本的来源、性别、种群结构和表型均已知。选取了八个变量(一个角度和七个测量值),主要针对髂骨远端部分,以便能够将其应用于破碎的化石髂骨。研究了种间变异、两性异形和种群结构。结果表明,在物种水平上确定单个化石髂骨是完全不可能的,但在种群水平上,有可能区分“纯”物种或“纯”物种及其共存的杂交形式,因为已证明存在一些细微差异,特别是绿蛙指名亚种髂骨相对于髂骨主轴的角度(特征2)和绿蛙林蛙的宽度(特征8);这两个参数明显与大小无关。除绿蛙林蛙外,未检测到两性异形。
我们在此提出一种新的生物测量方法,以便在种群水平上区分中欧水蛙属(林蛙属)的化石髂骨。