• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国胸痛单元和卒中单元的质量基准

Quality benchmarks for chest pain units and stroke units in Germany.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Herz-Jesu-Krankenhaus Dernbach, Südring 8, 56428, Dernbach, Germany.

Institute for Myocardial Infarction Research Foundation Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Herz. 2021 Apr;46(Suppl 1):89-93. doi: 10.1007/s00059-019-04881-3. Epub 2020 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00059-019-04881-3
PMID:31970463
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chest pain units (CPUs) and stroke units (SUs) provide specialized multidisciplinary in-hospital management for acute chest pain and ischemic stroke. We analyzed exemplary equivalent quality benchmarks in both concepts.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from the German CPU registry (2012-2015; 45 certified CPUs, 5881 patients) were compared with data from the SU registry of Rhineland-Palatinate (2011-2015; 29 SUs; 40,380 patients). Parameters comprised demographics, symptoms, diagnosis, medication, critical time intervals, therapeutics, and in-unit outcome.

RESULTS

Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (47.4%) and ischemic stroke (63.0%) were the most frequent entities. An electrocardiogram was performed on average within 7 min in CPUs, cranial imaging within 49 min in SUs. The mean time interval from admission until coronary intervention or lysis was 42 min or 57 min, respectively. Rates of antiplatelet therapy (90.1% vs. 96.0%), brain imaging, and coronary angiography were high (99.3% vs. 81.1%) and the mortality was low (0.8% for CPUs vs. 3.6% for SUs). The length of stay was shorter in CPUs (1.5 days vs. 4.4 days).

CONCLUSION

As reimbursement for emergency medicine in Germany was recently rearranged, quality benchmarking has gained incremental importance. Mandatory joint quality measurement in both concepts ensuring gap analysis and process improvement is encouraged.

摘要

背景

胸痛单元 (CPU) 和卒中单元 (SU) 为急性胸痛和缺血性卒中提供了专门的多学科院内管理。我们分析了这两个概念中具有代表性的等效质量基准。

材料与方法

比较了来自德国 CPU 注册中心(2012-2015 年;45 个认证 CPU,5881 例患者)的数据与莱茵兰-普法尔茨州 SU 注册中心(2011-2015 年;29 个 SU,40380 例患者)的数据。参数包括人口统计学、症状、诊断、药物治疗、关键时间间隔、治疗和单元内结果。

结果

非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(47.4%)和缺血性卒中(63.0%)是最常见的病症。CPU 平均在 7 分钟内进行心电图检查,SU 平均在 49 分钟内进行头部成像。从入院到进行冠状动脉介入或溶栓的平均时间间隔分别为 42 分钟或 57 分钟。抗血小板治疗率(90.1%对 96.0%)、脑成像和冠状动脉造影率高(99.3%对 81.1%),死亡率低(CPU 为 0.8%,SU 为 3.6%)。CPU 的住院时间更短(1.5 天对 4.4 天)。

结论

由于德国最近对急诊医学的报销进行了重新安排,质量基准的重要性日益增加。鼓励在这两个概念中进行强制性联合质量测量,以确保差距分析和流程改进。

相似文献

1
Quality benchmarks for chest pain units and stroke units in Germany.德国胸痛单元和卒中单元的质量基准
Herz. 2021 Apr;46(Suppl 1):89-93. doi: 10.1007/s00059-019-04881-3. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
2
[Comparison between chest pain units and stroke units : Essential components of the vascular emergency care system: comparison of structure, certification process, quality benchmarking and reimbursement].胸痛单元与卒中单元的比较:血管急症护理系统的基本组成部分:结构、认证流程、质量基准和报销的比较
Herz. 2021 Sep;46(Suppl 2):141-150. doi: 10.1007/s00059-020-04984-2. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
3
On- versus off-hour care for patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in Germany : Exemplary results within the chest pain unit concept.德国非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的非工作时间与工作时间护理:胸痛单元概念下的典型结果
Herz. 2016 Dec;41(8):725-731. doi: 10.1007/s00059-016-4425-5. Epub 2016 May 19.
4
Guideline-adherence regarding critical time intervals in the German Chest Pain Unit registry.德国胸痛单元注册研究中关键时间间隔的指南依从性。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Feb;9(1):52-61. doi: 10.1177/2048872618762639. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
5
German chest pain unit registry: data review after the first decade of certification.德国胸痛单元注册研究:认证开展十年来的数据评价
Herz. 2021 Apr;46(Suppl 1):24-32. doi: 10.1007/s00059-020-04912-4. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
6
Characterization and referral patterns of ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients admitted to chest pain units rather than directly to catherization laboratories. Data from the German Chest Pain Unit Registry.入住胸痛单元而非直接入住导管实验室的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的特征及转诊模式。来自德国胸痛单元注册研究的数据。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 15;231:31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.017.
7
Management of Pulmonary Embolism: Results from the German Chest Pain Unit Registry.肺栓塞管理:德国胸痛单元注册研究结果。
Cardiology. 2021;146(3):304-310. doi: 10.1159/000513695. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
8
Guideline-conforming timing of invasive management in troponin-positive or high-risk ACS without persistent ST-segment elevation in German chest pain units. Urban university maximum care vs. rural regional primary care.德国胸痛中心对肌钙蛋白阳性或高危、无持续性ST段抬高的急性冠状动脉综合征进行符合指南的侵入性治疗时机。城市大学重症监护与农村地区初级保健的比较。
Herz. 2016 Mar;41(2):151-8. doi: 10.1007/s00059-015-4354-8. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
9
Nationwide but still inhomogeneous distribution of certified chest pain units across Germany : Need to strengthen rural regions.德国全国范围内认证胸痛中心分布不均:需加强农村地区建设。
Herz. 2018 Feb;43(1):78-86. doi: 10.1007/s00059-016-4527-0. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
10
Pre- and early in-hospital procedures in patients with acute coronary syndromes: first results of the "German chest pain unit registry".急性冠脉综合征患者的住院前和早期院内程序:“德国胸痛单元注册研究”的初步结果。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 Dec;101(12):983-91. doi: 10.1007/s00392-012-0487-4. Epub 2012 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Management characteristics and prognosis after stroke in China: findings from a large nationwide stroke registry.中国脑卒中患者的管理特点和预后:来自一项大型全国脑卒中登记研究的结果。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2021 Mar;6(1):1-9. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000340. Epub 2020 Jun 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Guideline-adherence regarding critical time intervals in the German Chest Pain Unit registry.德国胸痛单元注册研究中关键时间间隔的指南依从性。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Feb;9(1):52-61. doi: 10.1177/2048872618762639. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
2
The quality of acute stroke care- an analysis of evidence-based indicators in 260 000 patients.急性脑卒中护理质量——26 万患者循证指标分析。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014 Nov 7;111(45):759-65. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0759.