Clinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Eur J Orthod. 2020 Apr 1;42(2):174-179. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjaa003.
Empiric data on headgear wear are scarce. The aim was to examine a possible discrepancy between the duration of wearing and force application, and whether such a difference is influenced by force level or direction of traction.
In this retrospective analysis, 122 consecutive patients were included. All were treated with headgear (three subgroups: high-pull headgear [n = 60], cervical-pull headgear [n = 32], and high-pull headgear in combination with an activator [n = 30]) and were monitored for three successive months using an electronic module. The device recorded chronographically the measured force magnitude and temperature, allowing to differentiate between the duration of headgear wear (recorded body temperature) and actual force application (recorded force).
For all subgroups, the average recorded force application was lower than wear time (mean inactivity during wear: 15.9 ± 22.8 minutes/night). The direction of traction significantly influenced the extent and length of wear time without force application (P < 0.001): patients with cervical-pull headgear were more prone to inactive wear time (27.7 minutes/night) than patients with high-pull headgear (13.7 minutes/night) or with headgear-activator (7.8 minutes/night). The observed inter-individual variability of inactive wear time was considerable (0-134 minutes/night). The mean applied force was highly significantly associated with inactive wear time (correlation coefficient: -0.575; P < 0.001), and force levels below 250 g seem particularly related to episodes of inactivity.
There is a clear incongruity between the duration of headgear wear and the duration of force application. Inactive wear time is influenced by the direction of traction and force level applied. Clinicians should be aware of the likelihood of periods of inactive wear time and researchers should search for options to reduce or even eliminate these periods.
有关头帽佩戴时间的数据很少。本研究旨在检查力的作用时间和力的施加时间之间是否存在差异,以及这种差异是否受到力的大小或牵引方向的影响。
本回顾性研究共纳入 122 例连续患者。所有患者均接受头帽治疗(高牵引头帽组[n=60]、颈牵引头帽组[n=32]和高牵引头帽联合激活器组[n=30]),并使用电子模块连续监测 3 个月。该装置按时间顺序记录测量力的大小和温度,从而区分头帽佩戴时间(记录体温度)和实际力的施加时间(记录力)。
对于所有亚组,记录的平均力的施加时间均低于佩戴时间(平均无作用时间:夜间 15.9±22.8 分钟)。牵引方向显著影响无作用力施加的佩戴时间的程度和长度(P<0.001):颈牵引头帽患者比高牵引头帽患者(夜间 13.7 分钟)或头帽-激活器患者(夜间 7.8 分钟)更易出现无作用力佩戴时间(夜间 27.7 分钟)。无作用力佩戴时间的个体间可变性很大(0-134 分钟/夜)。平均施加力与无作用力佩戴时间高度显著相关(相关系数:-0.575;P<0.001),并且低于 250 g 的力水平似乎与无作用力作用时间特别相关。
头帽佩戴时间和力的施加时间之间存在明显的不一致。无作用力佩戴时间受牵引方向和施加力水平的影响。临床医生应意识到存在无作用力佩戴时间的可能性,研究人员应寻找减少甚至消除这些时间的方法。