Shia Ben-Chang, Qin Lei, Lin Kuan-Chou, Fang Chih-Yuan, Tsai Lo-Lin, Kao Yi-Wei, Wu Szu-Yuan
Research Center of Big Data, College of management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan.
College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan.
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jan 21;12(2):258. doi: 10.3390/cancers12020258.
: Although clinicians encounter patients aged ≥70 years with locally advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (LA-OCSCC), no evidence is available to facilitate decision making regarding treatment for this elderly population. : We selected elderly (≥70 years) patients from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database who had received a diagnosis of LA-OCSCC. Propensity score matching was performed. Cox proportional hazards model curves were used to analyze all-cause mortality in patients in different age groups receiving different treatments. : The matching process yielded a final cohort of 976 patients in concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), non-treatment, radiotherapy (RT) alone, and surgery cohorts who were eligible for further analysis. After stratified analysis, the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) derived for surgery, RT alone, and non-treatment compared with CCRT were 0.66 (0.52 to 0.83), 1.02 (0.81 to 1.28), and 1.52 (1.21 to 1.91), respectively, in patients aged 70 to 80 years. In the oldest patients (aged >80 years), multivariate analysis indicated that the results of surgery or RT alone were nonsignificant compared with those of CCRT. The aHR (95% CI) derived for the highest mortality was 1.81 (1.11 to 2.40) for non-treatment compared with CCRT. : Surgery for elderly patients with LA-OCSCC is associated with a significant survival benefit, but the association is nonsignificant in the oldest elderly patients. No survival differences were observed between RT alone and CCRT in these elderly patients. Non-treatment should not be an option for these patients.
虽然临床医生会遇到年龄≥70岁的局部晚期口腔鳞状细胞癌(LA - OCSCC)患者,但目前尚无证据可辅助针对这一老年人群的治疗决策。我们从台湾癌症登记数据库中选取了诊断为LA - OCSCC的老年(≥70岁)患者。进行了倾向评分匹配。采用Cox比例风险模型曲线分析接受不同治疗的不同年龄组患者的全因死亡率。匹配过程最终产生了976例符合进一步分析条件的患者队列,这些患者分别接受同步放化疗(CCRT)、不治疗、单纯放疗(RT)和手术治疗。分层分析后,70至80岁患者中,与CCRT相比,手术、单纯RT和不治疗的调整后风险比(aHRs)(95%置信区间[CIs])分别为0.66(0.52至0.83)、1.02(0.81至1.28)和1.52(1.21至1.91)。在年龄最大的患者(>80岁)中,多变量分析表明,与CCRT相比,单纯手术或RT的结果无统计学意义。与CCRT相比,不治疗的最高死亡率的aHR(95%CI)为1.81(1.11至2.40)。老年LA - OCSCC患者接受手术与显著的生存获益相关,但在年龄最大的老年患者中这种相关性无统计学意义。在这些老年患者中,单纯RT和CCRT之间未观察到生存差异。不治疗不应作为这些患者的选择。