Suppr超能文献

基于剂量递增调强放疗的同步放化疗对晚期胸段食管鳞状细胞癌有效。

Dose escalation intensity-modulated radiotherapy-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy is effective for advanced-stage thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

作者信息

Chang Chia-Lun, Tsai Hsieh-Chih, Lin Wei-Cheng, Chang Jer-Hwa, Hsu Han-Lin, Chow Jyh-Ming, Yuan Kevin Sheng-Po, Wu Alexander T H, Wu Szu-Yuan

机构信息

Department of Hemato-Oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taiwan.

Graduate Institute of Applied Science and Technology, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 2017 Oct;125(1):73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.08.025. Epub 2017 Sep 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

No studies have investigated the effects of irradiation-dose escalation intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed data from patients with TESCC who were enrolled in the Taiwan Cancer Registry database. To compare treatment outcomes, the patients were categorized into two groups according to their radiotherapy doses: group 1, who received CCRT<60Gy with IMRT, and group 2, who received CCRT≥60Gy with IMRT. Group 1 was used as the control for investigating posttreatment mortality risk.

RESULTS

We enrolled 2061 patients with TESCC without distant metastasis who received CCRT with IMRT. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that advanced clinical American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (≥IIIA), alcohol consumption, and cigarette smoking were significant, poor independent predictors in patients with TESCC receiving IMRT-based CCRT. IMRT-based CCRT (≥60Gy; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-0.83) was a significant independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P<0.0001). After adjustment for confounders, the aHRs (95% CIs) for overall mortality at all clinical stages were 0.75 (0.68-0.83, P<0.0001) in group 2. In group 2, the aHRs (95% CIs) for overall mortality at early (IA-IIB) and advanced (IIIA-IIIC) AJCC clinical stages were 0.89 (0.70-1.04, P=0.1905) and 0.75 (0.67-0.83, P<0.0001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compared with standard-dose IMRT-based CCRT, high-dose IMRT-based CCRT yields more favorable survival outcomes in patients with advanced-stage TESCC.

摘要

目的

尚无研究调查基于调强放疗(IMRT)的剂量递增同步放化疗(CCRT)对胸段食管鳞状细胞癌(TESCC)患者的影响。

患者与方法

我们分析了台湾癌症登记数据库中纳入的TESCC患者的数据。为比较治疗结果,根据放疗剂量将患者分为两组:第1组,接受IMRT且CCRT<60Gy;第2组,接受IMRT且CCRT≥60Gy。第1组用作调查治疗后死亡风险的对照。

结果

我们纳入了2061例未发生远处转移且接受IMRT同步放化疗的TESCC患者。多因素Cox回归分析表明,美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)临床分期晚期(≥IIIA期)、饮酒和吸烟是接受基于IMRT的CCRT的TESCC患者显著的、不良的独立预测因素。基于IMRT的CCRT(≥60Gy;调整后风险比[aHR]:0.75;95%置信区间[CI]:0.63 - 0.83)是总生存的显著独立预后因素(P<0.0001)。在对混杂因素进行调整后,第2组所有临床分期的总死亡aHR(95%CI)为0.75(0.68 - 0.83,P<至0.0001)。在第2组中,AJCC临床早期(IA - IIB期)和晚期(IIIA - IIIC期)的总死亡aHR(95%CI)分别为0.89(0.70 - 1.04,P = 0.1905)和0.75(0.67 - 0.83,P<0.0001)。

结论

与标准剂量基于IMRT的CCRT相比,高剂量基于IMRT的CCRT在晚期TESCC患者中产生更有利的生存结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验