Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Australia.
Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Genet Med. 2020 May;22(5):937-944. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0745-1. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
Genomic newborn screening raises practical and ethical issues. Evidence is required to build a framework to introduce this technology safely and effectively. We investigated the choices made by a diverse group of parents with newborns when offered tiered genomic information from exome sequencing.
This population-derived cohort comprised infants with congenital deafness. Parents were offered exome sequencing and choice regarding the scope of analysis. Options were choice A, diagnostic analysis only; choice B, diagnostic analysis plus childhood-onset diseases with medical actionability; or choice C, diagnostic analysis plus childhood-onset diseases with or without medical actionability.
Of the 106 participants, 72 (68%) consented to receive additional findings with 29 (27.4%) selecting choice B and 43 (40.6%) opting for choice C. Family size, ethnicity, and age of infant at time of recruitment were the significant predictors of choice. Parents who opted to have additional findings analysis demonstrated less anxiety and decisional conflict.
These data provide evidence from a culturally diverse population that choice around additional findings is important and the age of the infant when this choice is offered impacts on their decision. We found no evidence that offering different levels of genomic information to parents of newborns has a negative psychological impact.
基因组新生儿筛查引发了实际和伦理问题。需要有证据来构建一个安全有效地引入这项技术的框架。我们研究了当向新生儿父母提供外显子组测序的分层基因组信息时,他们做出的选择。
本研究基于人群的队列包括先天性耳聋的婴儿。向父母提供外显子组测序和分析范围的选择。选项为 A 选择,仅进行诊断分析;B 选择,诊断分析加具有医疗可操作性的儿童期发病疾病;或 C 选择,诊断分析加具有或不具有医疗可操作性的儿童期发病疾病。
在 106 名参与者中,有 72 名(68%)同意接受额外的检测结果,其中 29 名(27.4%)选择 B 选择,43 名(40.6%)选择 C 选择。家庭规模、种族和婴儿招募时的年龄是选择的重要预测因素。选择进行额外发现分析的父母焦虑和决策冲突较少。
这些数据来自一个文化多样化的人群,提供了证据表明,对额外发现的选择很重要,并且在提供此选择时婴儿的年龄会影响他们的决定。我们没有发现向新生儿父母提供不同水平的基因组信息会产生负面心理影响的证据。