Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital Universitario "Dr. José Eleuterio González", Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico.
Universidad de Guadalajara, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio Alcalde e Instituto de Patología Infecciosa y Experimental, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Dec 28;2019:4549298. doi: 10.1155/2019/4549298. eCollection 2019.
AIM: In this study, we conducted a comparative study to explore the differences in therapeutic efficacy and intestinal microbiome of fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) FMT in addition with (FMT-L) for treatment of recurrent infection (R-CDI). METHODS: We designed a double-blinded randomized comparative two-arm pilot multicenter study to assess the efficacy and impact in the intestinal microbiome of standard capsules of FMT FMT-L enriched with 3 species of for patients with R-CDI. A 90-day follow-up of 21 patients was performed, starting at the beginning of the study. From the selected patients, fecal samples were obtained at days 0, 3, 7, and 28 after treatment. Fecal samples and FMT were analyzed by 16S rRNA sequencing. RESULTS: We included 21 patients (13 in the FMT group and 8 in the FMT-L group). Overall, both groups had a reduction in bowel movements per day, from 8.6 to 3.2 in the first 48 h (62.7% reduction, =0.001). No severe adverse reactions or recurrences were recorded. Firmicutes were the most abundant phylum in donors. A low relative abundance of Proteobacteria was detected and mostly found in patients even at higher proportions than the donor. The donor's pool also had relatively few Bacteroidetes, and some patients showed a higher abundance of this phylum. Based on the ANOSIM values, there is a significant difference between the microbial communities of basal samples and samples collected on day 7 (=0.045) and at day 28 (0.041). CONCLUSION: Fecal microbiota transplant by capsules was clinically and genomically similar between traditional FMT and enriched FMT with spp. Restoration of bacterial diversity and resolution of dysbiosis at days 7 and 28 were observed. Patients with a first episode of recurrence treated with FMT had an excellent response without severe adverse events; FMT should be considered as an early treatment during R-CDI.
目的:本研究通过对比研究,探讨粪便微生物移植(FMT)联合(FMT-L)治疗复发性艰难梭菌感染(R-CDI)的疗效和肠道微生物组的差异。
方法:我们设计了一项双盲随机对照双臂试点多中心研究,以评估标准胶囊 FMT 与富含 3 种 spp. 的 FMT-L 对 R-CDI 患者的疗效和肠道微生物组的影响。对 21 例患者进行了为期 90 天的随访,从研究开始时进行。从入选患者中,在治疗后第 0、3、7 和 28 天采集粪便样本。通过 16S rRNA 测序分析粪便样本和 FMT。
结果:我们纳入了 21 例患者(FMT 组 13 例,FMT-L 组 8 例)。总体而言,两组患者每天排便次数均减少,治疗后 48 小时内从 8.6 次减少至 3.2 次(减少 62.7%,=0.001)。未记录到严重不良反应或复发。厚壁菌门是供体中最丰富的门。检测到相对较低的变形菌门丰度,并且主要存在于患者中,甚至比供体中的比例更高。供体池中也相对缺乏拟杆菌门,一些患者的该门丰度较高。基于 ANOSIM 值,基础样本和第 7 天采集的样本(=0.045)以及第 28 天采集的样本(0.041)之间的微生物群落存在显著差异。
结论:胶囊型粪便微生物移植在传统 FMT 和富含 spp. 的 FMT-L 之间在临床和基因组上是相似的。在第 7 天和第 28 天观察到细菌多样性的恢复和肠道微生态失调的缓解。首次复发接受 FMT 治疗的患者反应良好,无严重不良事件;FMT 应被视为 R-CDI 的早期治疗方法。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019-12-28
J Physiol Pharmacol. 2016-12
Methods Mol Biol. 2016
Front Microbiol. 2023-4-27
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-4-25
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022-6-17
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021-8-31
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2016
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014-1
N Engl J Med. 2013-1-16