Vinterberg Johanna Eliasson, Oddsdottir Julia, Nye Maria, Pinton Philippe
Global Research and Medical, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Kastrup, Denmark.
EMEA RW Methods and Evidence Generation, IQVIA, London, UK.
Infect Dis Ther. 2025 Feb;14(2):327-355. doi: 10.1007/s40121-024-01105-y. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) is a major cause of increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Fecal-microbiota-based therapies are recommended for rCDI on completion of standard-of-care (SoC) antibiotics to prevent further recurrence: these therapies include conventional fecal-microbiota transplantation and the US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies REBYOTA® (RBL) and VOWST Oral Spores™ (VOS). As an alternative to microbiota-based therapies, bezlotoxumab, a monoclonal antibody, is used as adjuvant to SoC antibiotics to prevent rCDI. There are no head-to-head clinical trials comparing different microbiota-based therapies or bezlotoxumab for rCDI. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic literature review to identify clinical trials on rCDI treatments and assess the feasibility of using them to conduct an indirect treatment comparison (ITC). The feasibility analysis determined that trial heterogeneity, particularly relating to inclusion criteria, may significantly compromise ITC and prevent cross-trial comparisons. Our analysis underlines the need to adopt standardized protocols to ensure comparability across trials.
复发性艰难梭菌感染(rCDI)是发病率、死亡率和医疗成本增加的主要原因。在完成标准治疗(SoC)抗生素治疗后,推荐使用基于粪便微生物群的疗法来预防rCDI的进一步复发:这些疗法包括传统的粪便微生物群移植以及美国食品药品监督管理局批准的疗法REBYOTA®(RBL)和VOWST口服孢子(VOS)。作为基于微生物群疗法的替代方案,单克隆抗体bezlotoxumab被用作SoC抗生素的辅助药物以预防rCDI。目前尚无比较不同基于微生物群疗法或bezlotoxumab治疗rCDI的头对头临床试验。为填补这一空白,我们进行了一项系统的文献综述,以确定关于rCDI治疗的临床试验,并评估使用这些试验进行间接治疗比较(ITC)的可行性。可行性分析确定,试验异质性,特别是与纳入标准相关的异质性,可能会严重影响ITC并妨碍跨试验比较。我们的分析强调需要采用标准化方案以确保各试验之间具有可比性。