RPA Women and Babies, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jul;99(7):909-916. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13816. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
The cesarean delivery rate has been increasing globally in recent decades. The reasons for this are complex and subject to ongoing debate. Investigation of the indications for cesarean delivery and how these have changed over an extended period of time could provide insight into the reasons for changing obstetric practice. Our objective was to explore contributing factors to the increasing rate of cesarean delivery by examining the incidence of and indications for cesarean delivery over the past three decades at our institutions.
We conducted a retrospective observational study of all cesarean deliveries, from 24 weeks' gestational age onwards, within an inner-city hospital network in Sydney, Australia, between August 1989 and December 2016. The primary outcome measures were the rates of and indications for emergency and planned cesarean delivery. We also examined our data within the Robson 10-Group Classification system.
There were 147 722 births over the study period, with 37 309 cesarean deliveries for an overall rate of 25.3%. The rate of cesarean delivery increased from 18.7% in 1989-1994 (8.7% emergency, 10% planned) to 30.4% in 2010-2016 (11.4% emergency, 19% planned). Emergency cesarean delivery for slow progress increased from 3.4% to 5.5% of all births (a relative increase of 62%) and other emergency cesareans mainly performed for suspected intrapartum fetal compromise increased from 5.2% to 5.6% (a relative increase of 8%). Previous uterine surgery (predominantly cesarean section) was the largest contributor to the increase in planned procedures from 3.8% to 9.0% of all births, and 29% of all cesarean deliveries. Primary cesarean delivery for planned antenatal fetal indications, previous pregnancy problems, multiple gestation and maternal choice all increased substantially in combined rate from 0.7% to 4.9%. Cesarean rates in Robson groups 6, 7 and 8 (term breech and multiple gestations) increased most over time.
The increased rate of cesarean delivery is mainly attributable to a greater number of procedures performed for slow progress in labor, breech presentation or repeat cesarean section.
近几十年来,全球剖宫产率一直在上升。其原因复杂,且仍存在争议。研究剖宫产的指征及其在较长时间内的变化情况,可以深入了解改变产科实践的原因。我们的目的是通过研究我院过去三十年来剖宫产的发生率和指征,探讨剖宫产率上升的原因。
我们对澳大利亚悉尼一家市区医院网络内所有 24 孕周及以上的剖宫产进行了回顾性观察性研究,研究时间为 1989 年 8 月至 2016 年 12 月。主要结局指标为急诊剖宫产和择期剖宫产的发生率和指征。我们还使用 Robson 10 分组系统检查了我们的数据。
研究期间共分娩 147722 例,剖宫产 37309 例,剖宫产率为 25.3%。剖宫产率从 1989-1994 年的 18.7%(急诊剖宫产 8.7%,择期剖宫产 10%)上升到 2010-2016 年的 30.4%(急诊剖宫产 11.4%,择期剖宫产 19%)。因产程进展缓慢而进行的急诊剖宫产从所有分娩的 3.4%增加到 5.5%(相对增加 62%),主要因怀疑分娩时胎儿窘迫而进行的其他急诊剖宫产从 5.2%增加到 5.6%(相对增加 8%)。既往子宫手术(主要是剖宫产)是导致所有分娩中择期手术比例从 3.8%增加到 9.0%的主要原因,也是所有剖宫产的主要原因(占 29%)。因产前胎儿指征、既往妊娠问题、多胎妊娠和产妇选择而进行的初次剖宫产,其综合发生率从 0.7%增加到 4.9%。Robson 分组 6、7 和 8(足月臀位和多胎妊娠)的剖宫产率随时间推移增加最多。
剖宫产率的上升主要归因于因产程进展缓慢、臀位或再次剖宫产而进行的手术数量增加。