Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CANADA.
Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, BRAZIL.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Jul;52(7):1610-1616. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002271.
This study aimed to compare muscle activation of the diaphragm (DIA), scalenes (SA), parasternal intercostals (PS), and sternomastoid (SM) during submaximal intermittent neck flexion (INF) versus submaximal inspiratory threshold loading (ITL) until task failure in healthy adults.
Twelve healthy adults performed submaximal ITL or INF tests in random order for 2 d. Surface electromyography was monitored to acquire root mean square (RMS) and median power frequency (MPF) from the SA, PS, SM, and DIA. Maximal inspiratory pressures and maximal voluntary contraction for neck flexion were determined. Next, participants performed the first submaximal test-ITL or INF-targeting 50% ± 5% of the maximal inspiratory pressure or maximal voluntary contraction, respectively, until task failure. After a rest, they performed the other test until task failure. Two days later, they performed ITL and INF but in the opposite order. The Borg scale assessed breathlessness and perceived exertion.
Endurance times for ITL and INF were 38.1 and 26.3 min, respectively. INF activated three of four inspiratory muscles at higher average RMS (PS, SM, and SA) and at different MPF (PS, SM, and DIA but not SA) compared with ITL. During ITL, RMS did not change in the four inspiratory muscles over time, but MPF decreased in PS, SM, and SA (P < 0.04). In contrast, RMS increased in three of four inspiratory muscles (SM, PS, and SA) during INF, but MPF did not change throughout its duration. Borg rating was 3.9-fold greater than ITL compared with INF.
At a similar percentage of maximal load, INF evokes greater activation of primary muscles of inspiration (PS and SA) and a major accessory muscle of inspiration (SM) compared with ITL during a prolonged submaximal protocol.
本研究旨在比较健康成年人在亚最大间歇性颈部屈曲(INF)与亚最大吸气阈负荷(ITL)下,直至任务失败时,膈肌(DIA)、斜角肌(SA)、胸肋部肋间肌(PS)和胸锁乳突肌(SM)的肌肉激活情况。
12 名健康成年人随机进行 2 天的亚最大 ITL 或 INF 测试。监测表面肌电图以获取 SA、PS、SM 和 DIA 的均方根(RMS)和中值功率频率(MPF)。确定最大吸气压力和颈部屈曲的最大自主收缩。然后,参与者进行第一次亚最大测试-ITL 或 INF,分别针对 50%±5%的最大吸气压力或最大自主收缩,直至任务失败。休息后,他们进行另一项测试直至任务失败。两天后,他们进行 ITL 和 INF,但顺序相反。Borg 量表评估呼吸困难和感知用力。
ITL 和 INF 的耐力时间分别为 38.1 分钟和 26.3 分钟。与 ITL 相比,INF 以更高的平均 RMS(PS、SM 和 SA)和不同的 MPF(PS、SM 和 DIA,但不是 SA)激活了四组吸气肌中的三组。在 ITL 期间,四组吸气肌的 RMS 随时间没有变化,但 PS、SM 和 SA 的 MPF 下降(P<0.04)。相比之下,在 INF 期间,四组吸气肌中的三组(SM、PS 和 SA)的 RMS 增加,但整个过程中 MPF 没有变化。Borg 评分是 ITL 的 3.9 倍,与 INF 相比。
在相似的最大负荷百分比下,与 ITL 相比,在延长的亚最大协议期间,INF 会引起主要吸气肌(PS 和 SA)和主要辅助吸气肌(SM)更大的激活。