Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Apr;30(4):485-490. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000807. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
Patients with grade 3, deeply invasive endometrioid adenocarcinoma are typically managed with primary surgery. The role and type of adjuvant therapy used is controversial. We sought to evaluate the role of adjuvant radiation and/or chemotherapy in women with deeply invasive grade 3 endometrioid tumors.
A multi-center retrospective chart review was performed at three large medical institutions in the United States. Patients with grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma invading >50% of the myometrium were included. Medical records were queried to evaluate whether lymph node assessment was performed, the status of the lymph nodes, adjuvant treatment strategy used, and dates of death or recurrence.
Between 1984 and 2013, 257 patients were identified with a median follow-up of 3.08 years. Most patients (84.7%) had evaluation of pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph nodes and 43% had positive lymph nodes. For node negative patients, there was no difference in overall survival (OS) between those who received adjuvant pelvic radiation +/- vaginal brachytherapy (n=52) vs brachytherapy alone (n=46) (5-year probabilities were 0.73 vs 0.70, P=0.729). Among patients with positive lymph nodes (n=92), the adjuvant treatment strategy utilized impacted OS, with women undergoing a combination of chemotherapy and external beam radiation having the best outcomes (P=0.003).
Among women with grade 3, deeply invasive endometrioid adenocarcinoma, vaginal cuff brachytherapy alone resulted in similar survival when compared with pelvic radiation in node negative patients. The combination of chemotherapy with external beam radiation was associated with improved OS for women with positive nodes.
患有 3 级、深度浸润性子宫内膜样腺癌的患者通常采用初始手术治疗。辅助治疗的作用和类型存在争议。我们旨在评估辅助放疗和/或化疗在深度浸润性 3 级子宫内膜样肿瘤患者中的作用。
在美国三家大型医疗机构进行了多中心回顾性图表审查。纳入的患者患有浸润>50%的子宫肌层的 3 级子宫内膜样腺癌。检索病历以评估是否进行了淋巴结评估、淋巴结状态、使用的辅助治疗策略以及死亡或复发日期。
1984 年至 2013 年间,共确定了 257 例患者,中位随访时间为 3.08 年。大多数患者(84.7%)进行了盆腔和/或腹主动脉旁淋巴结评估,43%的患者淋巴结阳性。对于淋巴结阴性的患者,接受辅助盆腔放疗 +/-阴道近距离放疗(n=52)与单独阴道近距离放疗(n=46)的患者总生存(OS)无差异(5 年概率分别为 0.73 与 0.70,P=0.729)。在淋巴结阳性的患者中(n=92),辅助治疗策略影响 OS,接受化疗联合外照射治疗的患者结局最佳(P=0.003)。
对于 3 级、深度浸润性子宫内膜样腺癌患者,与淋巴结阴性患者中接受盆腔放疗相比,阴道袖口近距离放疗单独应用可获得相似的生存。化疗联合外照射放疗与淋巴结阳性患者的 OS 改善相关。