Sturrock R D, Sharma J N, Buchanan W W
Arthritis Rheum. 1977 Jan-Feb;20(1):42-4. doi: 10.1002/art.1780200107.
The scarcity of references in ancient medical literature to any disease resembling rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has led many Western rheumatologists to believe that rheumatoid arthritis is a disease of relatively recent origin. In a recent paper on this problem, Short traces the first adequate description of what was probably rheumatoid arthritis to Thomas Sydenham (1624-1689) and emphasizes that European and Greek medical literature before Sydenham's time may have confused gout and other forms of polyarthritis as manifestations of the same disease (1). Studies in human paleopathology have as yet produced no convincing evidence for the existenct of RA in ancient human remains, but Short suggested that a study of the ancient medical literature of the Eastern civilizations may provide some new information on the true antiquity of rheumatoid arthritis.
古代医学文献中鲜有关于类似类风湿性关节炎(RA)疾病的记载,这使得许多西方风湿病学家认为类风湿性关节炎是一种相对较新出现的疾病。在最近一篇关于这个问题的论文中,肖特将对可能是类风湿性关节炎的首次充分描述追溯到托马斯·西德纳姆(1624 - 1689),并强调在西德纳姆时代之前的欧洲和希腊医学文献可能将痛风和其他形式的多关节炎混淆为同一种疾病的表现(1)。人类古病理学研究尚未找到令人信服的证据证明古代人类遗骸中存在类风湿性关节炎,但肖特认为,对东方文明古代医学文献的研究可能会为类风湿性关节炎的真正古老程度提供一些新信息。